[Jump to letter: A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z]
(Anonymous). 1824. Lexicon Thucydidaeum: A Dictionary in Greek and English, of the Words, Phrases, and Principal Idioms, Contained in the History of the Peloponnesian War of Thucydides. London.
Abbott, T. K. 1890. “On δή after Relatives in Plato.” Hermathena 7:44–45.
Abraham, W., ed. 1991. Discourse Particles across Languages. Berlin.
———. 1991. Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German. Amsterdam.
Addis, D. R., L. Pan, M.-A. Vu, N. Laiser, and D. L. Schacter. 2009. “Constructive Episodic Simulation of the Future and the Past: Distinct Subsystems of a Core Brain Network Mediate Imagining and Remembering.” Neuropsychologia 47:2222–2238.
Adema, S. M. 2007. “Discourse Modes and Bases in Vergil’s Aeneid.” In The Language of Literature. Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. R. J. Allan, and M. Buijs, 42–64. Leiden.
———. 2008. Discourse Modes and Bases. The Use of Tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid. Amsterdam.
Adler, A. 2004. Lexicographi graeci I.2: Suidae Lexicon. Munich.
Aftosmis, J. 2010. Paradigm and Discourse in Archaic Greek Poetry. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
Agha, A. 2001. “Register.” In Key Terms in Language and Culture, ed. A. Duranti, 212–215. Malden, MA.
Ahrens, H. L. 1845. De crasi et aphaeresi cum corollario emendationum babrianarum. Stolberg.
———. 1859. “Ein Beitrag zur Etymologie der griechischen Zahlwörter.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete des Deutschen, Griechischen und Lateinischen 8:329–361.
Aijmer, K. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam.
———. 2009. “The Pragmatic Marker well: A Text Study.” In Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. O. Dontcheva-Navratilova and R. Povolná, 4–29. Newcastle.
———. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh.
Aijmer, K., A. Foolen, and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen. 2006. “Pragmatic Markers in Translation: A Methodological Proposal.” In Fischer 2006:101–114. Amsterdam.
Aijmer, K., and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen. 2003. “The Discourse Particle well and Its Equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.” Linguistics 41:1123–1161.
———. 2004. “A Model and a Methodology for the Study of Pragmatic Markers: The Semantic Field of Expectation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36:1781–1805.
———. 2011. “Pragmatic Markers.” In Discursive Pragmatics, ed. J. Zienkowski, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 223–427. Amsterdam.
Alberti, G. B. 1959. “L’uso delle particelle nella formula di correlazione πρῶτον... ἔπειτα.” Maia 11:44–62.
Allan, R. J. 2007. “Sense and Sentence Complexity: Sentence Structure, Sentence Connection, and Tense-Aspect as Indicators of Narrative Mode in Thucydides’ Histories.” In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. R. J. Allan, and M. Buijs, 93–121. Leiden.
———. 2009. “Towards a Typology of the Narrative Modes in Ancient Greek: Text Types and Narrative Structure in Euripidean Messenger Speeches.” In Bakker and Wakker 2009:171–203. Leiden.
———. 2011. “The Historical Present in Thucydides: Capturing the Case of αἰρεῖ and λαμβάνει.” In The Historical Present in Thucydides: Semantics and Narrative Function, ed. J. Lallot, A. Rijksbaron, B. Jacquinod, and M. Buijs, 37–63. Leiden.
———. 2013. “History as Presence: Time, Tense and Narrative Modes in Thucydides.” In Thucydides Between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis, and M. Tamiolaki, 371–390. Berlin.
———. 2017. “Ancient Greek adversative particles in contrast.” In Denizot and Spevak 2017:273–301.
Allan, W. 2000. “Euripides and the Sophists: Society and the Theatre of War.” In Euripides and Tragic Theatre in the Late Fifth Century, ed. M. J. Cropp, 145–156. Champaign, IL.
———. 2001. Euripides. The Children of Heracles. Warminster.
Allbritton, D. W., and R. J. Gerrig. 1991. “Participatory Responses in Text Understanding.” Journal of Memory and Language 30:603–626.
Allen, D. S. 2003. “Angry Bees, Wasps, and Jurors: The Symbolic Politics of ὀργή in Athens.” In Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, ed. S. Braund and G. W. Most, 76–98. New York.
Allen, T. W. 1931. Homer. Iliad. 2 vols. Oxford.
Allen, W. S. 1973. Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek. A Study of Theory and Reconstruction. Cambridge.
Altenberg, B. 2010. “Conclusive English then and Swedish : A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study.” Languages in Contrast 10:102–123.
Altenmüller, E., S. Schmidt, and E. Zimmermann. 2013. “A Cross-Taxa Concept of Emotion in Acoustic Communication: An Ethological Perspective.” In Altenmüller, Schmidt, and Zimmermann 2013:339–355. Oxford.
———, ed. 2013. The Evolution of Emotional Communication: From Sounds in Nonhuman Mammals to Speech and Music in Man. Oxford.
Ameka, F. 1992. “Interjections: The Universal yet Neglected Part of Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 18:101–118.
Andersen, G. 1998. “The Pragmatic Marker like from a Relevance-Theoretic Perspective.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:147–170. Amsterdam.
———. 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam.
Andersen, G., and T. Fretheim, eds. 2000. Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude. Amsterdam.
Ángeles Durán López, M. de los. 2000. “Las partículas griegas y las funciones de comunicación.” Revista Española de Lingüística 30:45–76.
Antonopoulou, E., and K. Nikiforidou. 2011. “Construction Grammar and Conventional Discourse: A Construction-Based Approach to Discoursal Incongruity.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:2594–2609.
Archakis, A. 2001. “On Discourse Markers: Evidence from Modem Greek.” Journal of Pragmatics 33:1235–1261.
Arend, W. 1933. Die typische Szenen bei Homer. Berlin.
Argaman, O. 2010. “Linguistic Markers and Emotional Intensity.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 39:89–99.
Ariel, M. 1988. “Referring and Accessibility.” Journal of Linguistics 24:65–87.
———. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London.
———. 1991. “The Function of Accessibility in a Theory of Grammar.” Journal of Pragmatics 16:443–463.
———. 1996. “Referring Expressions and the +/- Coreference Distinction.” In Reference and Referent Accessibility, ed. J. K. Gundel and T. Fretheim, 13–25. Amsterdam.
———. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge.
———. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge.
———. 2012. “Relational and Independent and Conjunctions.” Lingua 122:1692–1715.
———. 2014. “Or Constructions: Monosemy versus Polysemy.” In Competing Motivations, ed. B. Mac Whinney, A. Malchukov, and E. A. Moravcsik, 333–347. Oxford.
Arnim, H. von. 1912. Sprachliche Forschungen zur Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge. Vienna.
Arnold, M. B. 1961. Emotion and Personality. Vol. 1: Psychological Aspects. London.
Arnold, T. 1863. The History of the Peloponnesian War by Thucydides. 6th ed. Oxford.
Arnold, T. K. 1881. A Practical Introduction to Greek Prose Composition. Part 2: “The Particles.” London.
Asheri, D. 1988. “Introduzione generale” In Erodoto. Le storie. Libro I: La Lidia e la Persia. Ed. D. Asheri and V. Antelami, ix-lxix. Milan.
Asheri, D., A. B. Lloyd, and A. Corcella. 2007. A Commentary on Herodotus Books I-IV. Oxford.
Asheri, D., P. Vannicelli, A. Corcella, and A. Fraschetti. 2003. Erodoto. Le storie. Libro VIII: La vittoria di Temistocle. Milan.
———. 2006. Erodoto. Le storie. Libro IX: La battaglia di Platea. Milan.
Ast, F. 1835. Lexicon Platonicum. Leipzig.
Athanassaki, L. 2012. “Recreating the Emotional Experience of Contest and Victory Celebrations: Spectators and Celebrants in Pindar’s Epinicians.” In Approaches to Archaic Greek Poetry, ed. X. Riu and J. Portulas, 173-219. Messina.
Auer, P. 1992. “Introduction: John Gumperz’ Approach to Contextualization.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. P. Auer and A. Di Luzio, 1–37. Amsterdam.
———. 2000. “Pre- and Post-Positioning of wenn-Clauses in Spoken and Written German.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann, 173–204. Berlin.
———. 2002. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 33:1–39.
———. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 25:7–36.
———. 2009a. “On-Line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31:1–13.
———. 2009b. “Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction.” Discourse Processes 46:180–205.
Auer, P., E. Couper-Kuhlen, and F. Müller. 1999. Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. New York.
Auer, P., and A. Di Luzio, eds. 1992. The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam.
Auer, P., and Y. Maschler. 2013. “Discourse or Grammar? VS Patterns in Spoken Hebrew and Spoken German Narratives.” Language Sciences 37:147–181.
Auer, P., and S. Pfänder, eds. 2011. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin.
Auffarth, C. 2007. “Ritual, Performanz, Theater: Die Religion der Athener in Aristophanes‘ Komödien.” In Literatur und Religion 1: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, ed. A. F. Bierl, R. Lämmle, and K. Wesselmann, 387–414. Berlin.
Ausfeld, C. 1903. “De Graecorum precationibus quaestiones.” Jahrbuch Für Klassische Philologie, Supplementum 28:503–547.
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA.
Austin, N. 1966. “The Function of Digressions in the Iliad.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 7:295–312.
Auwera, J. van der. 1993. “‘Already’ and ‘Still’: Beyond Duality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16:613–653.
———. 1998. Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin. 
Auwera, J. van der, and V. A. Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 2:79–124.
Ax, W. 1982. “Aristarch und die ‘Grammatik.’” Glotta 60:96–109.
———. 1991. “Sprache als Gegenstand der alexandrinischen und pergamenischen Philologie.” In Geschichte der Sprachtheorie. Bd. 2: Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike, ed. P. Schmitter, 275–301. Tübingen.
Baar, T. van. 1997. Phasal Polarity. Amsterdam.
Bach, K. 1994. “Conversational Implicature.” Mind & Language 9:124–162.
Bach, K., and R. M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA.
Bader, F. 1973. “Lat. nempe, porceo et les fonctions des particules pronominales.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 68:27–75.
Baechle, N. 2007. Metrical Constraint and the Interpretation of Style in the Tragic Trimeter. Lanham, MD.
Bain, D. 1977. Actors and Audience: A Study of Asides and Related Conventions in Greek Drama. Oxford.
Baker, C. L. 1995. “Contrast, Discourse Prominence, and Intensification, with Special Reference to Locally Free Reflexives in British English.” Language 71:63–101.
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981 [1934]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin.
Bakker, E. J. 1986. “Hosper en eiper: Een aspect van Attische conversatie.” Lampas 19:142–158.
———. 1988. Linguistics and Formulas in Homer: Scalarity and the Description of the Particle ‘per.’ Amsterdam.
———. 1990a. “Homeric Discourse and Enjambement: A Cognitive Approach.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120:1–21.
———. 1990b. “Homerus als orale poëzie: De recente ontwikkelingen.” Lampas 23:384–405.
———. 1991. “Foregrounding and Indirect Discourse: Temporal Subclauses in a Herodotean Short Story.” Journal of Pragmatics 16:225–247.
———. 1993a. “Activation and Preservation: The Interdependence of Text and Performance in an Oral Tradition.” Oral Tradition 8:5–20.
———. 1993b. “Boundaries, Topics and the Structure of Discourse. An Investigation of the Ancient Greek Particle de.” Studies in Language 17:275–311.
———. 1993c. “Concession and Identification. The Diachronic Development of the Particle ‘per’.” In Miscellanea Linguistica Graeco-Latina, ed. L. Isebaert, 1-17. Namur.
———. 1993d. “Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and ‘Presence’ in Homeric Poetry.” Classical Antiquity 12:1–29.
———. 1995. “Noun-Epithet Formulas, Milman Parry, and the Grammar of Poetry.” In Homeric Questions, ed. J. P. Crielaard, 97–125. Amsterdam.
———. 1997a. “Introduction.” In Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, ed. E. J. Bakker, 1–6. Leiden.
———. 1997b. Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca, NY.
———. 1997c. “Storytelling in the Future: Truth, Time, and Tense in Homeric Epic.” In Written Voices, Spoken Signs. Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, ed. E. J. Bakker and A. Kahane, 11–36. Cambridge, MA.
———. 1997d. “The Study of Homeric Discourse.” In A New Companion to Homer, ed. I. Morris and B. B. Powell, 284–304. Leiden.
———. 1997e. “Verbal Aspect and Mimetic Description in Thucydides.” In Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, ed. E. J. Bakker, 7–54. Leiden.
———. 1998. “Fiktionalität und Mediumwechsel im Altgriechischen. Von Homer zu Thukydides.” In Verschriftung und Verschriftlichung: Aspekte des Medienwechsels in verschiedenen Kulturen und Epochen, ed. C. Ehlers, and U. Schaefer, 57-77. Tübingen.
———. 1999. “Homeric οὗτος and the Poetics of Deixis.” Classical Philology 94:1–19.
———. 2005. Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Washington, DC.
———. 2007. “Time, Tense, and Thucydides.” Classical World 100:113–122.
———. 2008. “The Syntax of Historie: How Herodotus Writes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, ed. C. Dewald and J. Marincola, 92–101. Cambridge.
———, ed. 2010. A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Chichester.
———. 2010. “Pragmatics: Speech and Text.” In Bakker ed. 2010:151–167. Chichester.
———. 2011. “Particles.” In The Homer Encyclopedia II, ed. M. Finkelberg, 631-632. Chichester.
———. 2013. The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge.
Bakker, E. J., and A. Kahane. 1997a. “Introduction.” In Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, ed. E. Bakker and A. Kahane, 1–10. Cambridge, MA.
———, eds. 1997b. Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text. Cambridge, MA.
Bakker, S. J. 2007. “Adjective Ordering in Herodotus: A Pragmatic Explanation.” In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. R. J. Allan and M. Buijs, 188–210. Leiden.
———. 2009. “On the Curious Combination of the Particles ΓΑΡ and ΟΥΝ.” In Bakker and Wakker 2009:41–61. Leiden.
Bakker, S. J., and G. C. Wakker, eds. 2009. Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek. Leiden.
Bakker, M. P. de. 2007. Speech and Authority in Herodotus’ Histories. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
———. 2013. “Character Judgements in the Histories: Their Function and Distribution.” In Thucydides between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis and M. Tamiolaki, 23–40. Berlin.
Bal, M. 1985. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narratology. Toronto.
———. 2006. “Narrativity and Voice.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. E. K. Brown and A. Anderson, 477-482. 2nd ed. Oxford.
Balassidis, C. 1979. “‘Περὶ τοῦ ᾽οὐ μὴν ἀλλά᾽, ‘οὐ μέντοι ἀλλά᾽, ‘οὐ γὰρ ἀλλά᾽.” Athenaion 7:221–227.
Bally, C. 1912. “Le style indirect libre en Français moderne.” Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 4:549–556; 597–606.
Bamberg, M. G. W, ed. 1997. Oral Versions of Personal Experience: Three Decades of Narrative Analysis. Mahwah, NJ.
Bamberg, M. G. W., and V. Marchman. 1991. “Binding and Unfolding: Towards the Linguistic Construction of Narrative Discourse.” Discourse Processes 14:277–305.
Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London.
Bara, B. G. 2010. Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication. Cambridge, MA.
Baragwanath, E. 2008. Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.
Bari, M. F. Di. 2010. “ὅδ’ ἐκεῖνος: Aristofane, Cavalieri 1331, Nuvole 1167.” Lexis 28:329-342.
Barlow, S. A. 1971. The Imagery of Euripides: A Study in the Dramatic Use of Pictorial Language. Bristol.
———. 1996. Euripides. Heracles. Warminster.
Barner, W. 1967. Neuere Alkaios-Papyri aus Oxyrhynchos. Hildesheim.
Barnes, H. R. 1986. “The Colometric Structure of Homeric Hexameter.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27:125–150.
Baron, C. 1890. Le pronom relatif et la conjonction en grec. Paris.
Barrett, J. 2002. Staged Narrative. Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy. Berkeley.
Barrett, L. F., and J. A. Russell. 2009. “Circumplex Models.” In The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences, ed. D. Sander and K. R. Scherer, 85–88. Oxford.
Barrett, W. S. 1964. Euripides. Hippolytus. Oxford.
———. 2007. “A Detail of Tragic Usage: The Application to Persons of Verbal Nouns in -μα.” In Greek Lyric, Tragedy, and Textual Criticism: Collected Papers, ed. M. L. West, 351-367. Oxford.
Barron, A. 2014. “Variational Pragmatics.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics online, ed. C. A. Chapelle,
Barth-Weingarten, D. 2012. “Of Ens ’n’ Ands: Observations on the Phonetic Make-up of a Coordinator and Its Uses in Talk-in-Interaction.” Language and Speech 55:35–56.
Barth-Weingarten, D., E. Reber, and M. Selting, eds. 2010. Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam.
Barthes, R. 1957. Mythologies. Paris.
———. 1977. Poétique du récit. Paris.
Basile, N. 1998. Sintassi storica del greco antico. Bari.
Basset, L. 1979. Les emplois périphrastiques du verbe grec μέλλειν: Étude de linguistique grecque et essai de linguistique générale. Lyon.
———. 1988. “Valeurs et emplois de la particule dite modale en grec ancien.” In In the Footsteps of Raphael Kühner, ed. H. A. Mulder, A. Rijksbaron, and G. C. Wakker, 27–37. Amsterdam.
———. 1989. La syntaxe de l’imaginaire: Étude de modes et des négations dans l’Iliade et l’Odyssée. Lyon.
———. 1997. “ἀλλ’ ἐξόλοισθ’ αὐτῶι κοαξ. Réexamen des emplois de ἀλλά à la lumière de l’enonciation dans Les Grenouilles d’Aristophane.” In Rijksbaron 1997:75–99. Amsterdam.
Battezzato, L. 2005. “Lyric.” In A Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. J. Gregory, 149–166. Oxford.
Battezzato, L., and M. A. Rodda. 2018. “Particelle e asindeto nel greco classico.” Glotta 94:3–37.
Bauer, W., and N. Wecklein. 1894. Des Euripides Medea. Munich.
Bäumlein, W. von. 1846. Untersuchungen über die griechischen Modi und die Partikeln kén und án. Heilbronn.
———. 1859. “Zu der Lehre von den Partikeln κέν und ἄν.” Jahrbücher Für Classische Philologie 5:1–10.
———. 1861. Untersuchungen über griechische Partikeln. Stuttgart.
———. 1863. “Griechische Syntax (Jahresbericht).” Philologus 19:282–307.
Bay, S. M. 2009. “The Deferment of Postpositive Particles in Documentary Papyri.” Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 46:75–79.
Bazzanella, C. 1990. “Phatic Connectives as Interactional Cues in Contemporary Spoken Italian.” Journal of Pragmatics 14:629–647.
———. 1995. “I segnali discorsivi.” In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione III, ed. L. Renzi, G. Salvi, and A. Cardinaletti, 225–257. Bologna.
———. 1999. “Corrispondenze funzionali di ‘well’ in italiano: Analisi di un testo letterario e problemi generali.” In Linguistica testuale comparativa. In memoriam Maria-Elisabeth Conte, ed. G. Skytte and F. Sabatini, 99–110. Copenhagen.
———. 2003. “Dal latino ante all’italiano anzi: La ‘deriva modale.’” In Colloquia absentium. Studi sulla comunicazione epistolare in Cicerone, ed. A. Garcea, 123–140. Turin.
———. 2004. “Emotions, Language, and Context.” In Emotion in Dialogic Interaction: Advances in the Complex, ed. E. Weigand, 55–72. Amsterdam.
———. 2006. “Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a ‘Compositional’ Meaning.” In Fischer 2006:449–464. Amsterdam and Boston.
Bazzanella, C., and C. Bosco. 2005. “Corpus Linguistics and the Modal Shift: Pragmatic Markers and the Case of allora.” In Romance Corpus Linguistics: Corpora and Historical Linguistics, ed. C. D. Pusch, J. Kabatek, and W. Raible, 443–453. Tübingen.
Bazzanella, C., C. Bosco, E. Calaresu, A. Garcea, P. Guil Povedano, and A. Radulescu. 2005. “Dal latino ‘iam’ agli esiti nelle lingue romanze: verso una configurazione pragmatica complessiva.” Cuadernos de filologia italiana 12:49–82.
Bazzanella, C., C. Bosco, A. Garcea, B. Gili Fivela, J. Miecznikowski, and F. Tini Brunozzi. 2007. “Italian allora, French alors: Functions, Convergences and Divergences.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6:9–30.
Bazzanella, C., and L. Morra. 2000. “Discourse Markers and the Indeterminacy of Translation.” In Argomenti per una linguistica della traduzione, ed. I. Korzen, and C. Marello, 149–157. Alessandria.
Beaman, K. 1984. “Coordination and Subordination Revisited: Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Narrative Discourse.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. D. Tannen, 12:45–80. Norwood, NJ.
Beaugrande, R. de, and W. U. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London.
Bechtel, F. 1921. Die griechischen Dialekte. Berlin.
Beck, D. 2005. Homeric Conversation. Washington, DC.
———. 2009. “Speech Act Types, Conversational Exchange, and the Speech Representational Spectrum in Homer.” In Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, ed. A. Rengakos and J. Grethlein, 137–151. Berlin.
———. 2012. Speech Presentation in Homeric Epic. Austin.
Beck, I. 1971. Die Ringkomposition bei Herodot und ihre Bedeutung für die Beweistechnik. Hildesheim.
Bednarek, M. 2009. “Emotion Talk and Emotional Talk: Cognitive and Discursive Perspectives.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. H. Pishwa, 395–432. Berlin.
Beeching, K. 2002. Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French. Amsterdam.
Beekes, R. 2010. Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 2 vols. Leiden.
Béguelin, M.-J. 2010. “Noyaux prédicatifs juxtaposés.” In La parataxe: Entre dépendance et intégration, ed. M.-J. Béguelin, M. Avanzi, and G. Corminboeuf, 3–33. Bern.
Bekker, I. 1845. Herodoti De bello persico libri novem. Berlin.
———. 1863. Homerische Blätter I. Bonn.
Bell, D. M. 1998. “Cancellative Discourse Markers: A Core/Periphery Approach.” Pragmatics 8:515–541.
———. 2009. “Mind You.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:915–920.
Belli, G. 1987. “Aristotele e Posidonio sul significato del ‘syndesmos.’” Aevum 61:105–107.
Benfey, T. 1839-1842. Griechisches Wurzellexikon I. Berlin.
Benedetto, V. di. 1958. “Dionisio Trace e la Techne a lui attribuita.” Annali Classe di Lettere e Filosofia della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 27:169–210.
———. 1959. “Dionisio Trace e la Techne a lui attribuita (continuazione e fine).” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 28:87–118.
———. 1973. “La Techne spuria.” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 3:797–814.
———. 1990. “At the Origins of Greek Grammar.” Glotta 60:19–39.
Bennekom, R. van. 1975. “The Definitions of ΣYNΔEΣMOΣ and APΘPON in Aristotle, ‘Poetics’ Ch. 20.” Mnemosyne 28:399–411.
Bentein, K. 2015. “Particle-usage in documentary papyri (I–IV AD): an integrated, sociolinguistically-informed approach.” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 55:721–753.
Berettoni, P. 1969. “Ricerche sulla frase interrogativa in greco antico.” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 38:39–97.
Bergaigne, A. 1877. De coniunctivi et optativi in indoeuropaeis linguis informatione et vi antiquissima. Paris.
Bergen, G. van, R. van Gijn, L. Hogeweg, and S. Lestrade. 2011. “Discourse Marking and the Subtle Art of Mind-Reading: The Case of Dutch eigenlijk.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:3877–3892.
Berrendonner, A. 1990. “Pour une macro-syntaxe.” Travaux de Linguistique 21:25–36.
Berrendonner, A., and M.-J. Reichler-Béguelin. 1995. “Accords associatifs.” In Référence, inférence: l’anaphore associative, ed. G. Kleiber and C. Schnedecker, 21–42. Montpellier.
Bertrand, N. 2010. L’ordre des mots chez Homère: structure informationnelle, localisation et progression du récit. PhD diss., University of Lille.
Bertuccelli Papi, M. 2009. “Implicitness.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. J. Verschueren and J.-O. Östman, 139–162. Amsterdam.
Besselaar, J. J. van den. 1958. “As Partículas Gregas.” Boletim de Estudos Clássicos 2:117–130.
———. 1962. “Estudo Lexicográfico do Particula ἄρα.” Boletim de Estudos Clássicos 5:221–265.
Besslich, S. 1966. Schweigen-verschweigen-übergehen: die Darstellung des Unausgesprochenen in der Odyssee. Heidelberg.
Bestgen, Y., and W. Vonk. 1995. “The Role of Temporal Segmentation Markers in Discourse Processing.” Discourse Processes 19:385–406.
Bétant, É. A. A. 1843. Lexicon Thucydideum. Geneva.
Beye, C. R. 1964. “Homeric Battle Narrative and Catalogues.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68:345–373.
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge.
———. 1994. “An Analytical Framework for Register Studies.” In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. D. Biber and E. Finegan, 31–56. New York.
———. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge.
———. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “Corpus-Based and Corpus-Driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 159–191. Oxford.
Biber, D., S. Conrad, and R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge.
Bierl, A. F. 2001. Der Chor in der alten Komödie: Ritual und Performativität. Munich.
Bierl, A. F., F. Graf, and J. Latacz, eds. 2013. Homers Ilias: Gesamtkommentar. Basel.
Biraud, M. 2010. Les interjections du théâtre grec antique: Étude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain-la-Neuve.
Birkler, W. 1867. Die oratorischen Transitions- und Argumentations-Phrasen τί δέ; τί δέ δή; τί οὖν; τί δαί; τί δῆτα;. Ehingen and Tübingen.
Bischoff, H. 1932. Der Warner bei Herodot. Leipzig.
Bjorkman, B. M. 2010. “Towards a unified asymmetric semantics for and.” On Linguistic Interfaces II:1-13.
Blake, N. F. 1996. Essays on Shakespeare’s Language: 1st series. Misterton.
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford.
———. 1988. “So as a Constraint on Relevance.” In Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, ed. R. M. Kempson, 183–195. Cambridge.
———. 1989. “Denial and Contrast: A Relevance Theoretic Analysis of but.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12:15–37.
———. 1992. Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford.
———. 2000. “Indicators and Procedures: nevertheless and but.” Journal of Linguistics 36:463–486.
———. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge.
Blakemore, D., and R. Carston. 2005. “The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and.” Lingua 115:569–589.
Blank, D. 1983. “Remarks on Nicanor, the Stoics, and the Ancient Theory of Punctuation.” Glotta 61:48–67.
Blank, D. L. 1982. Ancient Philosophy and Grammar: The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus. Chico, CA.
Blankenborg, R. 2015. Audible Punctuation: Performative Pause in Homeric Prosody. PhD diss., University of Nijmegen.
Blass, F. 1887. Die Attische Beredsamkeit: Von Gorgias bis zu Lysias I. 2nd ed. Leipzig.
———. 1906. Aeschylos’ Choephoren. Halle.
Blass, R. 1990. Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge.
Bloch, A. 1955. “Was bedeutet das ‘epische’ τε?” Museum Helveticum 12:145–153.
Block, E. 1982. “The Narrator Speaks: Apostrophe in Homer and Vergil.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 112:7–22.
Blomqvist, J. 1969. Greek Particles in Hellenistic Prose. Lund.
———. 1974. “Juxtaposed τε καί in Post-Classical Prose.” Hermes 102:170–178.
———. 1979. Das sogenannte KAI adversativum. Zur Semantik einer griechischen Partikel. Uppsala.
———. 1981. “On Adversative Coordination in Ancient Greek and as a Universal Linguistic Phenomenon.” Acta Societatis Linguisticae Upsaliensis. Nova Series 3:57–70.
———. 1995. “ἀλλά... μήν, ἀλλά... μέντοι, and Atticistic Particle Usage.” Eranos 93:3–23.
Bloomfield, M. 1885. “Four Etymological Notes.” American Journal of Philology 6:44–46.
Blühdorn, H. 2008. “Subordination and Coordination in Syntax, Semantics and Discourse: Evidence from the Study of Connectives.” In “Subordination” versus “Coordination” in Sentence and Text: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. C. Fabricius-Hansen and W. Ramm, 59–85. Amsterdam.
Boas, H. C., ed. 2010. Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam.
Bodin, L., and P. Mazon. 1919 [1902]. Extraits d’Aristophane et de Ménandre. Paris.
Boegehold, A. L. 1999. When a Gesture Was Expected: A Selection of Examples from Archaic and Classical Greek Literature. Princeton.
Bois, J. W. du. 2003. “Argument Structure: Grammar in Use.” In Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, ed. J. W. Du Bois, L. E. Kumpf, and W. J. Ashby, 11–60. Amsterdam.
———. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. R. Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam.
———. 2010 [2001]. “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Unpublished paper.
———. 2011. “Co-Opting Intersubjectivity: Dialogic Rhetoric of the Self.” In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, ed. C. Meyer and F. Girke, 52–83. New York.
———. 2014. “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25:359–410.
Bois, J. W. du, and R. Giora. 2014. “From Cognitive-Functional Linguistics to Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25:351–357.
Bois, J. W. du, and E. Kärkkäinen. 2012. “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text & Talk 32:433–451.
Boisacq, E. 1916. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris.
Bolden, G. B. 2006. “Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers ‘So’ and ‘Oh’ and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56:661–688.
———. 2008. “Reopening Russian Conversations: The Discourse Particle ‘-to’ and the Negotiation of Interpersonal Accountability in Closings.” Human Communication Research 34:99–136.
———. 2009. “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:974–998.
Bolinger, D. 1989. Intonation and Its Uses. Stanford.
Bolkestein, A. M. 1996. “Free but Not Arbitrary: ‘Emotive’ Word Order in Latin?” In On Latin: Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honour of Harm Pinkster, ed. R. Risselada, J. R. de Jong, and A. M. Bolkestein, 7–24. Amsterdam.
Bollack, J. 1990. L’Oedipe Roi de Sophocle. Lille.
Bolling, G. M. 1902. “καίτοι with the Participle.” American Journal of Philology 23:319–321.
———. 1929. “The Meaning of που in Homer.” Language 5:100–105.
———. 1935. “Review of Denniston, The Greek Particles.” Language 11:260–262.
———. 1960. “Description of ἐπεί Syntax in Homer.” Glotta 38:18–38.
Bolly, C., and L. Degand. 2013. “Have You Seen What I Mean? From Verbal Constructions to Discourse Markers.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14:210–235.
Bond, G. W. 1981. Euripides. Heracles. Oxford.
Bonifazi, A. 2001. Mescolare un cratere di canti: pragmatica della poesia epinicia in Pindaro. Alessandria.
———. 2004a. “Communication in Pindar’s Deictic Acts.” Arethusa 37:391–414.
———. 2004b. “Relative Pronouns and Memory: Pindar beyond Syntax.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102:41–68.
———. 2004c. “Κεῖνος in Pindar: Between Grammar and Poetic Intention.” Classical Philology 99:283–299.
———. 2008. “Memory and Visualization in Homeric Discourse Markers.” In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. E. A. Mackay, 35–64. Leiden.
———. 2009. “The Pragmatic Meanings of Some Discourse Markers in Homer.” In Pragmatische Kategorien: Form, Funktion und Diachronie, ed. E. Rieken and P. Widmer, 29–36. Wiesbaden.
———. 2010. “Anaphoric Pronouns αὐτός and κεῖνος in Homer: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach.” In La Morfologia del Greco tra Tipologia e Diacronia, ed. Pierluigi Cuzzolin, G. F. Nieddu, G. Paulis, and I. Putzu, 97–114. Pavia.
———. 2012. Homer’s Versicolored Fabric: The Evocative Power of Ancient Greek Epic Word-Making. Washington, DC.
———. 2015. “Problematizing Syndetic Coordination: Ancient Greek ‘and’ from Homer to Aristophanes.” In Perspectives on Historical Syntax, ed. C. Viti, 251–269. Amsterdam.
———. 2018. “Embedded focalization and free indirect speech in Homer as viewpoint blending.” In Homer in Performance: Rhapsodes, Narrators, and Characters, ed. J. Ready and C. Tsagalis, 230-254. Austin.
———. 2019. “Autos and the Center-Periphery Image Schema.” In Towards a Cognitive Classical Linguistics: The Embodied Basis of Constructions in Greek and Latin, ed. W. M. Short and E. Mocciaro, 126-148. Berlin.
Bonifazi, A., and D. F. Elmer. 2012a. “Composing Lines, Performing Acts: Clauses, Discourse Acts, and Melodic Units in a South Slavic Epic Song.” In Orality, Literacy and Performance in the Ancient World, ed. E. Minchin, 89–109. Leiden.
———. 2012b. “The Meaning of Melody: Remarks on the Performance-Based Analysis of Bosniac Epic Song.” In Child’s Children: Ballad Study and Its Legacies, ed. J. Harris and B. Hillers, 293–309. Trier.
———. 2016. “Visuality in Bosniac and Homeric Epic.” Classics@ 14. Washington, DC.
Bonitz, H. 1854. Beiträge zur Erklärung des Thukydides. Vienna.
———. 1867. “Über den Gebrauch von τε γάρ bei Aristoteles.” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 18:672–682.
———. 1870. Index aristotelicus. Berlin.
Bonner, R. J. 1920. “The Book Divisions of Thucydides.” Classical Philology 15:73–82.
Boogaart, R. 2009. “Semantics and Pragmatics in Construction Grammar: The Case of Modal Verbs.” In Contexts and Constructions, ed. A. Bergs and G. Diewald, 213–241. Amsterdam.
Bopp, F. 1833. Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Zend, Griechischen, Lateinischen, Litthauischen, Gothischen und Deutschen. Berlin.
Borochovsky Bar-Aba, E. 2003. “Punctuation Marks: Procedural and Conceptual Uses.” Journal of Pragmatics 35:1031–1048.
Bothe, F. H. 1829. Aristophanis Aves. Leipzig.
Bouma, G., P. Hendriks, and J. Hoeksema. 2007. “Focus Particles inside Prepositional Phrases: A Comparison of Dutch, English, and German.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10:1–24.
Bornemann, E., and E. Risch. 1978. Griechische Grammatik. 2nd ed. Frankfurt and Berlin.
Bower, A. R. 1997. “Deliberative Action Constructs: Reference and Evaluation in Narrative.” In Toward a Social Science of Language II, ed. G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, and J. Baugh, 57–76. Amsterdam.
Bower, G. H., J. B. Black, and T. J. Turner. 1979. “Scripts in Memory for Text.” Cognitive Psychology 11:177–220.
Bowie, A. M. 2007. Herodotus. Histories. Book VIII. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge.
———. 2013. Homer. Odyssey, Books XIII and XIV. Cambridge.
Brandt, P. 1898. De particularum subiunctivarum apud Pindarum usu. Leipzig.
Brandt, W. 1908. Griechische Temporalpartikeln vornehmlich im ionischen und dorischen Dialekt. Göttingen.
Brannan, R. 2008. “The Discourse Function of ἀλλά in Non-Negative Contexts.” Presentation at the Evangelical Theological Society’s 60th National Meeting, Providence, RI, November 19-21.
Braswell, B. K. 1988. A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar. Berlin.
Breitenbach, L. 1841. “Über die Partikeln οὔκουν und οὐκοῦν.” Zeitschrift für Altertumswissenschaft 8:105–112.
Bremond, C. 1973. Logique du récit. Paris.
Brewster, C. 1992. “Discourse and Relevance: The Case of Modern Greek lipon.” In Studies in Greek Linguistics: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 18–20 April 1991, ed. G. Beloudes, 357-375. Thessaloniki.
Bright, W., ed. 1966. Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, Los Angeles, May 1964. The Hague.
Brinkmann, A. 1913. “Lückenbüsser (μέντοι γε, καίτοι γε).” Rheinisches Museum 68:320.
Brinton, L. J. 1990. “The Development of Discourse Markers in English.” In Historical Linguistics and Philology, ed. J. Fisiak, 45–71. Berlin.
———. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin.
———. 2006. “Pathways in the Development of Pragmatic Markers in English.” In The Handbook of the History of English, ed. A. van Kemenade and B. Los, 307–334. Malden, MA.
Brisard, F., J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, eds. 2009. Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics. Amsterdam.
Briz, A., and M. Estellés. 2010. “On the Relationship between Attenuation, Discourse Particles and Position.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, and S. Schneider, 289–304. Bingley.
Broadhead, H. D. 1960. Aeschylus. Persae. Cambridge.
Brock, R. 2003. “Authorial Voice and Narrative Management in Herodotus.” In Herodotus and His World, ed. R. Derow and P. Parker, 3–16. Oxford.
Brody, J. 1987. “Particles Borrowed from Spanish as Discourse Markers in Mayan Languages.” Anthropological Linguistics 29:507–521.
Bromig, G. 1879. De asyndeti natura et apud Aeschylum usu. Münster.
Broschmann, M. 1882. De γάρ particulae usu herodoteo. Leipzig.
Brouwer, S. 1975. Een studie over enige archaïsche elementen in de stijl van Herodotus. Utrecht.
Brown, G., and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge.
Brown, H. P. 2006. “Addressing Agamemnon: A Pilot Study of Politeness and Pragmatics in the Iliad.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 136:1–46.
Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. E. N. Goody, 56–311. Cambridge.
Brownson, C. L. 1922. Xenophon. Anabasis. London.
Brownson, C. L. 1980. Xenophon. Anabasis. Cambridge, MA.
Brugmann, K. 1883. “Über ἄρα, ἄρ, ῥα und Litauisch ir.” Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft zu Leipzig 1-2:37–70.
———. 1897. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen: Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre. 2nd ed. Straßburg.
———. 1904. Die Demonstrativpronomina der indogermanischen Sprachen: eine bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Leipzig.
Brugmann, K., and B. Delbrück. 1900. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Stuttgart.
Brugmann, K., and A. Thumb. 1913. Griechische Grammatik. Munich.
Bruijnen, S., and S. Sudhoff. 2013. “Wir müssen sowieso erst herausfinden, was das überhaupt bedeutet. Die Partikeln sowieso und überhaupt im Deutschen und Niederländischen.” Germanistische Mitteilungen 39:79–104.
Buchwald, O. 1865. De interrogativarum et οὔκουν particularum apud graecos poetas tragicos usu. Breslau.
Buck, C. D. 1955. The Greek Dialects. 3rd ed. Chicago.
Budelmann, F. 1998. “Review of S. Pfeiffer-Petersen, Konfliktstichomythien bei Sophokles: Funktion und Gestaltung.” The Classical Review, n.s. 48:5–7.
———. 2000. The Language of Sophocles: Communality, Communication, and Involvement. Cambridge.
Budelmann, F., and P. E. Easterling. 2010. “Reading Minds in Greek Tragedy.” Greece & Rome 57:289–303.
Budé, G. 1556 [1529]. Commentarii linguae graecae. Paris.
Buffing, P. 2011. “‘Ik heb het wel gezegd dat je beter bij mij kon blijven!’ [On Character Changes in Euripides’ Medea as Reflected in Her Language Use.].” Unpublished paper. Amsterdam.
Bühler, K. 1965. Sprachtheorie. 2nd ed. Jena.
Buijs, M. 2005. Clause Combining in Ancient Greek Narrative Discourse. The Distribution of Subclauses and Participial Clauses in Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis. Leiden.
———. 2007. “Aspectual Differences and Narrative Technique: Xenophon’s Hellenica & Agesilaus.” In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. R. J. Allan and M. Buijs, 122–153. Leiden.
Bundy, E. L. 1962. Studia pindarica. Berkeley.
Burguière, P. 1960. Histoire de l’infinitif en grec. Paris.
Burkert, W. 1972. Homo necans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen. Berlin.
Burton, R. W. B. 1962. Pindar’s Pythian Odes: Essays in Interpretation. Oxford.
———. 1980. The Chorus in Sophocles’ Tragedies. Oxford.
Bury, J. B. 1890. The Nemean Odes of Pindar. London.
———. 1892a. The Isthmian Odes of Pindar. London.
———. 1892b. “μέν... τε. Appendix A.” In Isthmian Odes of Pindar, ed. J. B. Bury, 153–161. London.
Bury, R. G. 1926. Plato. Laws. London.
Buttmann, P. 1825. “εὖτε, ἠΰτε, δεῦτε.” In Lexilogus, oder Beiträge zur griechischen Wort-Erklärung, hauptsächlich für Homer und Hesiod II, 227–233. Berlin.
———. 1841. “Excursus XII: De particula δέ in apodosi.” In Demosthenis oratio in Midiam: Cum annotatione critica et exegetica, 153-164. 3rd ed. Berlin.
Buxton, R. G. A. 1982. Persuasion in Greek Tragedy. Cambridge.
Bybee, J. L. 2010. “Chunking and Degrees of Autonomy.” In Language, Usage and Cognition, ed. J. L. Bybee, 33–56. Cambridge.
Bybee, J. L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge.
Bybee, J. L., and P. J. Hopper, eds. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam.
Byron, P. A., and D. K. Heeman. 1998. “Discourse Marker Use in Task-Oriented Spoken Dialog.” Technical Report 664:1–28.
Bywater, I. 1892. “Apodotic δέ.” In Nicomachean Ethics, 34. Oxford.
Caffi, C. 2006. “Pragmatic Presupposition.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. E. K. Brown and A. Anderson, 17–25. 2nd ed. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “Weakening or Strengthening? A Case of Enantiosemy in Plato’s Gorgias.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, and S. Schneider, 181–202. Bingley.
Caffi, C., and R. W. Janney. 1994. “Toward a Pragmatics of Emotive Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 22:325–373.
Cagnazzi, S. 1975. “Tavola dei 28 logoi di Erodoto.” Hermes 103:385–423.
Cairns, D. L. 2003. “Ethics, Ethology, Terminology: Iliadic Anger and the Cross-Cultural Study of Emotion.” In Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, ed. S. Braund and G. W. Most, 11–49. Cambridge.
———. 2008. “Look Both Ways: Studying Emotion in Ancient Greek.” Critical Quarterly 50:43–62.
Cairns, F. 2011. “Money and the Poet: The First Stasimon of Pindar Isthmian 2.” Mnemosyne 64:21–36.
Calame, C. 1985. “L’impact du passage de l’oral à l’écrit sur l’énoncé de l’énonciation dans la littérature de la Grèce archaïque.” In Oralità: Cultura, letteratura, discorso. Atti del convegno internazionale (Urbino 21-25 Luglio 1980), ed. B. Gentili and G. Paioni, 101–118. Rome.
———. 2009. “Fra racconto eroico e poesia rituale: Il soggetto poetico che canta il mito (Pindaro, Olimpica 6).” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 92:11–26.
———. 2013. “Choral Polyphony and the Ritual Functions of Tragic Songs.” In Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy, ed. R. Gagné and M. Govers Hopman, 35–58. Cambridge.
Callipo, M. 2011. Dionisio Trace e la tradizione grammaticale. Rome.
Callow, K. 1992. “The Disappearing ‘de’ in 1 Corinthians.” In Linguistics and New Testament Interpretation, ed. D. A. Black, 183–193. Nashville.
Campbell, L. 1867. “The Sophist and Statesman of Plato. General Introduction.” In The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato, i-xc. Oxford.
———. 1894. Plato’s Republic II. Oxford.
Canakis, C. 1995. KAI: The Story of a Conjunction. PhD diss., University of Chicago.
Capelle, C. 1877. “γάρ (Review of Pfudel and Sernatinger).” Philologus 36:700–710.
Carbaugh, D. 2005. Cultures in Conversation. London.
Carey, C. 1991. “The Victory Ode in Performance: The Case for the Chorus.” Classical Philology 86:192–200.
Carnuth, O. 1875. Nicanoris Peri odysseiakīs stigmīs reliquiae emendatiores. Berlin.
Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford.
Carston, R., and S. Uchida. 1998. Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam.
Carter, D. M. 2007. The Politics of Greek Tragedy. Exeter.
Caspers, C. 2010. “The Pragmatic Function and Textual Status of Euripidean οὔ που and ἦ που.” Classical Quarterly 60:327–344.
Cauer, P. 1889. “Zur homerischen Interpunktion.” Rheinisches Museum 44:347–368.
———. 1914. Die Kunst des Übersetzens. 5th ed. Berlin.
Cavallin, A. 1941. “(τὸ) λοιπόν. Eine bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung.” Eranos 39:121–144.
Cavallo, G., ed. 2008. Hellenistic Bookhands. Berlin .
Celle, A., and R. Huart. 2007. “Connectives as Discourse Landmarks: Introduction.” In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, ed. A. Celle and R. Huart, 1–11. Amsterdam.
Cesare, A.-M. De. 2010. “On the Focusing Function of Focusing Adverbs: A Discussion Based on Italian Data.” Linguistik Online 44:
Chafe, W. L. 1976. “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View.” In Subject and Topic, ed. C. N. Li, 25–55. New York.
———. 1979. “The Flow of Thought and the Flow of Language.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. T. Givón, 159–181. New York.
———, ed. 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ.
———. 1982. “Integration and Involvement In Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” In Spoken and Written Language, ed. D. Tannen, 35–53. Norwood, NJ.
———. 1985. “Speaking, Writing, and Prescriptivism.” In Georgetown University Round Table, ed. D. Schiffrin, 95–103. Cambridge.
———. 1987. “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. R. S. Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam.
———. 1988a. “Linking Intonation Units in Spoken English.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson, 1–27. Amsterdam.
———. 1988b. “Punctuation and the Prosody of Written Language.” Written Communication 5:395–426.
———. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago.
———. 1997. “The Interplay of Syntax and Prosody in the Expression of Thoughts.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 23:389–401.
———. 2001. “The Analysis of Discourse Flow.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. H. E. Hamilton, D. Tannen, and D. Schiffrin, 671–687. Oxford.
Chanet, A.-M. 1979. “Ἕως et πρίν en grec classique.” Revue des Études Grecques 92:166–207.
———. 1990. “Négation sur parataxe et structures apparentées en grec : Comment se construit l’interprétation globale.” L’information Grammaticale 46:28–33.
Chang, M.-H., and H.-Y. Su. 2012. “To Mark or Not to Mark the Cause, That Is the Question: Causal Marking in Taiwanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 44:1743–1763.
Chaniotis, A., ed. 2012. Sources and methods for the study of emotions in the Greek world. Stuttgart.
Chaniotis, A., and P. Ducrey, eds. 2013. Unveiling Emotions II: Emotions in Greece and Rome: Texts, Images, Material Culture. Stuttgart.
Chantraine, P. 1927. Histoire du parfait grec. Paris.
———. 1933. La formation des noms en grec ancien. Paris.
———. 1942. Grammaire homérique. Tome 1: Morphologie. Paris.
———. 1953a. Grammaire homérique. Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris.
———. 1953b. “Remarques sur certaines particules homériques & la structure de la phrase complexe et la parataxe.” In Grammaire homérique II, 340–364. Paris.
———. 1956. Études sur le vocabulaire grec. Paris.
———. 1961. Morphologie historique du grec. Paris.
———. 2009. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots. Ed. J. Taillardat, O. Masson, and J.-L. Perpillou. Revised edition. Paris.
Chapman, R. W. 1911. “ἀλλά... μέν.” The Classical Review 25:204–205.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, N., and J. A. McGilvray. 2012. The Science of Language. Cambridge.
Christ, M. R. 2013. “Herodotean Kings and Historical Inquiry.” In Herodotus I, ed. R. Vignolo Munson, 212–250. Oxford.
Christ, W. von. 1880. “Der Gebrauch der griechischen Partikel τε mit besonderer bezugnahme auf Homer.” In Sitzungsberichte der Königliche Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 25–76.
Christidis, A. P. 1987. “On the Interplay of Deixis and Anaphora in the History of Greek: Ancient Greek ἤν, ἵνα, Modern Greek νά, να.” Minos 20-22:97–111.
Christodoulidou, M. 2011. “Lexical Markers within the University Lecture.” Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5:143–160.
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge.
Clark, H. H., and E. V. Clark. 1977. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York.
Clark, H. H., and C. R. Marshall. 1981. “Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge.” In Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. I. Sag, A. K. Joshi, and B. Webber, 10–63. Cambridge.
Clark, M. 1997. Out of Line: Homeric Composition beyond the Hexameter. Lanham, MD.
Clarke, M. 2010. “Semantics and Vocabulary.” In Bakker 2010:120–133. Chichester.
Classen, J. 1854. Beobachtungen über den homerischen Sprachgebrauch. Frankfurt.
———. 1859. “[Review of Ameis’ edition of Homer’s Odyssey].” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 79:306.
———. 1862. Thukydides I. Berlin.
———. 1879. Beobachtungen über den homerischen Sprachgebrauch. 2nd ed. Frankfurt.
Classen, J., and J. Steup. 1892–1922. Thukydides. Erklärt von J. Classen. 3rd ed. 8 vols. Berlin.
Clayman, S. E. 2013. “Turn-Constructional Units and the Transition-Relevance Place.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 150–166. Malden, MA.
Cleef, F. L. van. 1895. Index Antiphonteus. Ithaca, NY.
Clemoes, P. 1952. Liturgical Influence on Punctuation in Late Old English and Early Middle English Manuscripts. Cambridge.
Cobet, C. G. 1856. Novae lectiones. Leiden.
———. 1873. Variae lectiones. Leiden.
———. 1875. “Homerica.” Mnemosyne 3:359–373.
———. 1876. Miscellanea critica quibus continentur observationes criticae in scriptores praesertim Homerum et Demosthenem. Leiden.
Cobet, J. 1971. “Herodots Exkurse und die Frage der Einheit seines Werkes.” Historia 17:171–176.
Cogan, M. 1981. The Human Thing: The Speeches and Principles of Thucydides’ History. Chicago.
Cohen, E. 2007. “Discourse Markers: Cotext and Context Sensitivity.” Proceedings of the Israeli Linguistic Society 16:v – xxiii.
Cohen, G. L. 1988. “Origin of the Greek Particle de.” In Pursuit of Linguistic Insight, ed. G. L. Cohen, 135–136. Rolla.
Cohn, L. 1882. “μέντοι.” Hermes 17:645–647.
Cole, T. 1987. “1 + 1 = 3: Studies in Pindar’s Arithmetic.” American Journal of Philology 108:553–568.
———. 1988. Epiploke: Rhythmical Continuity and Poetic Structure in Greek Lyric Verse. Cambridge, MA.
Cole Babbitt, F. 1901. “The Use of μή in Questions.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 12:307–317.
Collard, C. 2005. “Colloquial Language in Tragedy: A Supplement to the Work of P. T. Stevens.” The Classical Quarterly 55:350–386.
———. 2007. “On Stichomythia.” In Tragedy, Euripides and Euripideans: Selected Papers, ed. C. Collard, 16–30. Bristol.
Collinge, N. E. 1988. “Thoughts on the Pragmatics of Ancient Greek.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 214:1–13.
Collins, C. 1991. The Poetics of the Mind’s Eye: Literature and the Psychology of Imagination. Philadelphia.
Collins, D. 2004. Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Washington, DC.
Collitz, H. 1895. “The Etymology of ἄρα and μάψ.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 26:xxxix – xl.
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge.
———. 1985. Tense. Cambridge.
Conacher, D. J. 1998. Euripides and the Sophists. London.
Connor, W. R. 1984. Thucydides. Princeton.
———. 1985. “Narrative Discourse in Thucydides.” In The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek, ed. M. H. Jameson, 1–17. Stanford.
Conrad, S., and D. Biber. 2000. “Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. S. Hunston and G. Thompson, 56–73. New York.
———, eds. 2001. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Harlow.
Considine, P. 1966. “Some Homeric Terms for Anger.” Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa 9:15–25.
Conte, M. E. 1999. Condizioni di coerenza. Alessandria.
Conti, L. 2014. “El espectro funcional de οὕτω(ς) en los poemas homéricos.” Emerita 82:25–49.
Cook, A. 1992. “Particles, Qualification, Ordering, Style, Irony and Meaning in Plato’s Dialogues.” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 40:111–126.
Cook-Gumperz, J., and J. J. Gumperz. 1976. “Context in Children’s Speech.” In Papers on Language and Context, ed. J. Cook-Gumperz and J. J. Gumperz, 1–26. Berkeley.
Cooper, G. L., III. 1974. “Intrusive Oblique Infinitives in Herodotus.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104:23–76.
———, after K. W. Krüger. 1998. Greek Syntax: Attic Greek Prose Syntax II. Ann Arbor.
———, after K. W. Krüger. 2002. Greek Syntax: Early Greek Poetic and Herodotean Syntax IV. Ann Arbor.
Copeland, J. E. 1997. “On the Tarahumara particle pa: an optional mode of delimiting information segments.” In The Twenty-Third LACUS Forum 1996, ed. A. Melby, 313–324. Chapel Hill.
Cornish, F. 1999. Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding. Oxford.
———. 2002. “Anaphora: Lexico-Textual Structure, or Means for Utterance Integration within a Discourse? A Critique of the Functional-Grammar Account.” Linguistics 40:469–493.
———. 2005. “Degrees of Indirectness: Two Types of Implicit Referents and Their Retrieval via Unaccented Pronouns.” In Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling, ed. A. Branco, T. McEnery, and R. Mitkov, 199–220. Amsterdam.
Corrigan, R., E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, and K. Wheatley, eds. 2009. Formulaic Language. Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change. Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
Corssen, W. 1863. Kritische Beiträge zur lateinischen Formenlehre. Leipzig.
Corum, C. 1975. “Basques, Particles, and Babytalk: A Case for Pragmatics.” In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1975:90–99.
Coseriu, E. 1980. “Partikeln und Sprachtypus. Zur strukturell-funktionellen Fragestellung in der Sprachtypologie.” In Wege zur universalien Forschung. Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, ed. C. Brettschneider and G. Lehmann, 199–206. Tübingen.
Coulmas, F., ed. 1986. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin.
Coulon, V, ed. 1958. Aristophane. Les Oiseaux, Lysistrata. Trans. H. van Daele. Paris.
Coulon, V., and P. J. de La Combe. 2012. Aristophane. Les Grenouilles. Paris.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1988. “On the Temporal Interpretation of Postposed when-Clauses in Narrative Discourse.” In Papers in Language and Mediaeval Studies Presented to Alfred Schopf, ed. R. Matthews and F. Schmole-Rostowsky, 353–372. Frankfurt.
———. 1996. “Intonation and Clause Combining in Discourse: The Case of because.” Pragmatics 6:389–426.
———. 2003. “Intonation and Discourse: Current Views from Within.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. H. E. Hamilton, D. Schiffrin, and D. Tannen, 13–34. Oxford.
———. 2005. “Prosodic Cues of Discourse Units.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. E. K. Brown and A. H. Anderson, 178-182. 2nd ed. Oxford.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., and B. Kortmann, eds. 2000. Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., and M. Selting, eds. 1996. Prosody and Conversation. Cambridge.
———. 2001. “Introducing Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 1–22. Amsterdam.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., and S. A. Thompson. 2012. “The Grammar of pro-Repeat Responses to Informings in English Conversation.” Presentation at Left/Right-Asymmetries in Conversational Language, FRIAS, Freiburg, May 16–17.
Crespo, E. 1997. “Sintaxis de los elementos de relación en griego clásico.” In Actas del IX Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos II, ed. F. R. Adrados and A. Martínez Díez, 3–42. Madrid.
———. 2009. “Conjunctive Adverbs in Ancient Greek.” In Early European Languages in the Eyes of Modern Linguistics, ed. K. Loudová and M. Žáková, 111–20. Brno.
———. 2017. “A unitary account of the meaning of kaí.” In Denizot and Spevak 2017:257–272.
Crespo, E., J. de la Villa, and A. R. Revuelta. 2006. Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on “Greek syntax and word classes” held in Madrid on 18-21 June 2003. Louvain-la-Neuve.
Cristofaro, S. 2003. Subordination. Oxford.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford.
Croft, W., and D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge.
Cruttenden, A. 1997. Intonation. Cambridge.
Crystal, D. 2008. “Think on My Words”: Exploring Shakespeare’s Language. Cambridge.
Csapo, E. 2002. “Kallippides on the Floor-Sweepings: The Limits of Realism in Classical Acting and Performance Styles.” In Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession, ed. P. Easterling and E. Hall, 127–147. Cambridge.
Cuenca, M.-J. 2000. “Defining the Indefinable? Interjections.” Syntaxis 3:29–44.
———. 2006. “Interjections and Pragmatic Errors in Dubbing.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 51:20–35.
Cuenca, M.-J., and M.-J. Marín. 2009. “Co-Occurrence of Discourse Markers in Catalan and Spanish Oral Narrative.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:899–914.
Culy, C. 1997. “Logophoric Pronouns and Point of View.” Linguistics 35:845–860.
Curtius, G. 1873. Grundzüge der griechischen Etymologie. 4th ed. Leipzig.
Cutting, J. 2008. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. 2nd ed. London.
Cuypers, M. P. 2004. “Apollonius of Rhodes.” In Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. I. J. F. de Jong, R. Nünlist, and A. Bowie, 43–62. Leiden.
———. 2005. “Interactional Particles and Narrative Voice in Apollonius and Homer.” In Beginning from Apollo: Studies in Apollonius Rhodius and the Argonautic Tradition, ed. M. P. Cuypers, and M. A. Harder, 35–69. Leuven-La-Neuve.
Daiute, C., and K. A. Nelson. 1997. “Making sense of the sense-making function of narrative evaluation.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7:207–215.
Dalimier, C. 2001. Apollonius Dyscole. Traité des conjonctions. Introduction, texte, traduction et commentaire. Paris.
Dancygier, B. 2012. The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge.
Dancygier, B., and E. Sweetser. 2000. “Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, Epistemic Stance, and Clause Order.” In Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast, ed. B. Kortmann and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 111–142. Berlin.
———, eds. 2012. Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge.
Danek, G. 1988. Studien zur Dolonie. Vienna.
Daneš, F. 1990. “On the Stylistic Relevance of the Choice of Anaphoric Expressions.” Rivista di Linguistica 2:121–139.
Dascal, M., and T. Katriel. 1977. “Between Semantics and Pragmatics: Two Types of ‘but’ - Hebrew ‘aval’ and ‘ela.’” Theoretical Linguistics 4:143–171.
Davidse, K., L. Vandelanotte, and H. Cuyckens, eds. 2010. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin.
Davies, M. 1988. “Monody, Choral Lyric, and the Tyranny of the Handbook.” Classical Quarterly 38:52–64.
———. 1991. Sophocles. Trachiniae. Oxford.
Dawe, R. D. 2006 [1982]. Sophocles. Oedipus Rex. Cambridge.
Debnar, P. 2001. Speaking the Same Language: Speech and Audience in Thucydides’ Spartan Debate. Ann Arbor.
———. 2013. “Blurring the Boundaries of Speech: Thucydides and Indirect Discourse.” In Thucydides Between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis and M. Tamiolaki, 271–286. Berlin.
Dedaić, M. N., and M. Mišković-Luković. 2010. South Slavic Discourse Particles. Amsterdam.
Defour, T. 2008. “The Speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of Well and Now as Pragmatic Markers.” English Text Construction 1:62–82.
Degand, L., B. Cornillie, and P. Pietrandrea, eds. 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description. Amsterdam.
———. 2013. “Modal Particles and Discourse Markers: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” In Degand, Cornillie, and Pietrandrea 2013:1–18. Amsterdam.
Degand, L., and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, eds. 2011. Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, and (Inter)subjectification: Methodological Issues in the Study of Discourse Markers. Berlin.
Dehé, N. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge.
Delbrück, B. 1893. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Straßburg.
Delogu, F. 2009. “Presupposition.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. J. Verschueren and J.-A. Östman, 195-207. Amsterdam.
Deneau, D. P. 1986. “Pointing Theory and Some Victorian Practices.” Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature 4:97–134.
Denis, D. 2015. The Development of Pragmatic Markers in Canadian English. Ph.D diss., University of Toronto.
Denizot, C., and O. Spevak, eds. 2017. Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek. Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
Denniston, J. D. 1929. “Four Notes on Greek Particles.” Classical Review 43:118–119.
———. 1930. “Notes on the Greek Particles.” Classical Review 44:213–215.
———. 1950. The Greek Particles. 2nd ed. Oxford.
———. 1952. Greek Prose Style. Oxford.
Denniston, J. D., and D. L. Page, eds. 1957. Aeschylus. Agamemnon. Oxford.
Deppermann, A., R. Fiehler, and T. Spranz-Fogasy. 2006. Grammatik und Interaktion. Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von grammatischen Strukturen und Gesprächsprozessen. Radolfzell.
Des Places, E. 1929. Étude sur quelques particules de liaison chez Platon. Paris.
———. 1947. Le pronom chez Pindare. Paris.
Detienne, M. 1981. L’invention de la mythologie. Paris.
Devarius, M. 1588. Liber de graecae linguae particulis. Rome.
Devarius, M., and R. Klotz. 1835–1842. Matthaei Devarii liber de Graecae linguae particulis. Leipzig.
Devine, A. M., and L. D. Stephens. 1994. The Prosody of Greek Speech. New York.
———. 2000. Discontinuous Syntax: Hyperbaton in Greek. New York .
Dewald, C. 1999. “The Figured Stage: Focalizing the Initial Narratives of Herodotus and Thucydides.” In Contextualizing Classics: Ideology, Performance, Dialogue: Essays in Honor of John J. Peradotto, ed. T. M. Falkner, N. Felson, and D. Konstan, 221–252. Lanham, MD.
———. 2002. “I Didn’t Give You My Own Genealogy: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. E. J. Bakker, I. J. F de Jong, and H. van Wees, 267–289. Leiden.
Dewald, C., and J. Marincola, eds. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus. Cambridge.
Dér, C. I., and A. Markó. 2010. “A Pilot Study of Hungarian Discourse Markers.” Language and Speech 53:135–180.
Dickey, E. 1996. Greek Forms of Address: From Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford.
———. 2007. Ancient Greek Scholarship. Oxford.
Diels, H., and W. Kranz. 1951–1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: griechisch und deutsch. 3 vols. Berlin.
Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam.
Diewald, G. 1999. “Die dialogische Bedeutungskomponente von Modalpartikeln.” In Dialogue Analysis and the Mass Media, ed. B. Naumann, 187–199. Tübingen.
———. 2008. “Die Funktion ‘idiomatischer’ Konstruktionen bei Grammatikalisierungsprozessen – Illustriert am Beispiel der Modalpartikel ruhig.” In Konstruktionsgrammatik. Bd. 2: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik, ed. K. Fischer and A. Stefanowitsch, 33–57. Tübingen.
Diggle, J. 1984. Euripidis fabulae. Cyclops, Alcestis, Medea, Heraclidae, Hippolytus, Andromacha, Hecuba. Oxford.
———. 1994. Euripidis fabulae. Helena, Phoenissae, Orestes, Bacchae, Iphigenia Aulidensis, Rhesus. Oxford.
Dijk, T. van. 1979. “Pragmatic Connectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 3:447–56.
———. 1982. “Episodes as Units of Discourse Analysis.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. D. Tannen, 177–195. Washington, DC. 
Dik, H. 1995. Word Order in Ancient Greek: A Pragmatic Account of Word Order Variation in Herodotus. Amsterdam.
———. 2007. Word Order in Greek Tragic Dialogue. Oxford.
Dik, S. C. 1968. Coordination. Amsterdam.
———. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam.
———. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Dordrecht.
Dikken, M. den, ed. 2013. The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge.
Dillon, M. 1995. “By Gods, Tongues, and Dogs: The Use of Oaths in Aristophanic Comedy.” Greece and Rome 42:135–151.
Dimock, G. E. 1952. “‘ἀλλά in Lysias and Plato’s Phaedrus.” American Journal of Philology 73:381–396.
Dindorf, G. 1870. Lexicon Sophocleum. Leipzig.
Dindorf, W. 1873. Lexicon Aeschyleum. Leipzig.
Dinsmore, J. 1987. “Mental Spaces from a Functional Perspective.” Cognitive Science 11:1–21.
Dittenberger, W. 1881. “Sprachliche Kriterien für die Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge.” Hermes 16:321–345.
Dittmar, N. 2010. “Register.” In Variation and Change: Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. M. Fried, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 221–233. Amsterdam.
Dobrov, G. 1988. “The Syntax of Coreference in Greek.” Classical Philology 83:275–288.
Dobson, J. F. 1919. The Greek Orators. London.
Dodds, E. R. 1960 [1944]. Euripides. Bacchae. Oxford.
Döderlein, L. 1850. Homerisches Glossarium. Erlangen.
———. 1858. Homerica particula γάρ nusquam refertur ad insequentem sententiam. Erlangen.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., and R. Povolná, eds. 2009. Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse. Newcastle.
Doron, E. 1994. “The Discourse Function of Appositives.” In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics and of the Workshop on Discourse, ed. R. Buchalla and A. Mitwoch, 53–65. Jerusalem.
Dover, K. J. 1954–1955. “Problems in Thucydides VI and VII.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 183:4–11.
———. 1960. Greek Word Order. Cambridge.
———. 1965. Thucydides. Book VI. Oxford.
———. 1968. Aristophanes. Clouds. Oxford.
———. 1972. Aristophanic comedy. Berkeley.
———. 1987a. “Language and Character in Aristophanes.” In Greek and the Greeks: Collected Papers. Vol. 1: Language, Poetry, Drama, 237–248. Oxford.
———. 1987b. “Some Types of Abnormal Word-Order in Attic Comedy.” In Greek and the Greeks: Collected Papers. Vol. 1: Language, Poetry, Drama, 43–66. Oxford.
———. 1987c. “The Style of Aristophanes.” In Greek and the Greeks: Collected Papers. Vol. 1: Language, Poetry, Drama, 224–236. Oxford.
———. 1988. Greek and the Greeks: Collected Papers. Vol. 2: The Greeks and Their Legacy: Prose Literature, History, Society, Transmission, Influence. Oxford.
———. 1993. Aristophanes. Frogs. Oxford.
———. 1997a. The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. Oxford.
———. 1997b. “Units of Utterance.” In The Evolution of Greek Prose Style, 26–40. Oxford.
Drummen, A. M. 2009. “Discourse Cohesion in Dialogue: Turn-Initial ἀλλά in Greek Drama.” In Bakker and Wakker 2009:135–154. Leiden.
———. 2013a. “A Constructionist Approach to the Potential Optative in Classical Greek Drama.” Glotta 89:68–108.
———. 2013b. “Coherence.” In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, ed. G. K. Giannakis, BrillOnline.
———. 2013c. “Cohesion.” In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, ed. G. K. Giannakis, BrillOnline.
———. 2019. “A construction-grammar analysis of ancient Greek particles.” In Toward a Cognitive Classical Linguistics: The Embodied Basis of Constructions in Greek and Latin, ed. E. Mocciaro and W. M. Short, 42–68. Berlin.
Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire: Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris.
———. 1975. “Je trouve que.” Semantikos 1:63–88.
———. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris.
———. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris.
Dué, C., and M. Ebbott. 2010. Iliad 10 and the Poetics of Ambush: A Multitext Edition with Essays and Commentary. Washington, DC.
Duhoux, Y. 1997a. “Grec écrit et grec parlé. Une étude contrastive des particules aux Ve-IVe siècles.” In Rijksbaron 1997:15–48. Amsterdam.
———. 1997b. “Quelques idees recues, et neanmoins fausses, sur les particules grecques.” L’Antiquité Classique 66:281–288.
———. 1998. “Les particules grecques: Les situations homérique et mycénienne.” In Langue et langues: Hommage à Albert Maniet, ed. Y. Duhoux, 13–42. Louvain-la-Neuve.
———. 2000. “Particules à emploi ‘métrique’ selon Denys Le Thrace.” Emerita  68:31–46.
———. 2004. “Langage de femmes et d’hommes en grec ancien: L'exemple de Lysistrata.” In Indo-European Perspectives: Studies in Honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies, ed. J. H. W. Penney, 131–145. Oxford.
———. 2006. “Les particules: Une classe de mots à supprimer en grec ancien?” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on “Greek Syntax and Word Classes” Held in Madrid on 18-21, June 2003, ed. E. Crespo, J. de la Villa, and A. Revuelta, 519–536. Louvain-la-Neuve.
Dunbar, N. 1995. Aristophanes. Birds. Oxford.
Dunkel, G. 1990. “J. Wackernagel und die idg. Partikel *so, *ke, *kem und *an.” In Sprachwissenschaft und Philologie. Jacob Wackernagel und die Indogermanistik heute, ed. H. Eichner, and E. Rix, 100–130. Wiesbaden.
———. 1992. “Die Grammatik der Partikeln.” In Rekonstruktion und relative Chronologie, ed. R. Beekes, A. Lubotsky, and J. Weitenberg, 153–177. Innsbruck.
Dunn, F. M. 2007. Present Shock in Late Fifth-Century Greece. Ann Arbor.
Düntzer, H. 1872. “Über au, aute, autis, authis.” In Homerische Abhandlungen, ed. by H. Düntzer, 579–592. Leipzig.
Dupont-Roc, R., and J. Lallot. 1980. Aristote. La Poétique. Texte, traduction, notes. Paris.
Durling, R. J. 1988. “Some Particles and Particle Clusters in Galen.” Glotta 66:183–189.
———. 1995. “Atar οun kai in Galen and His Predecessors.” Glotta 73:76.
Dynel, M. 2011. “Stranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse.” Brno Studies in English 37:41–61.
Earp, F. R. 1944. The Style of Sophocles. Cambridge.
———. 1948. The Style of Aeschylus. Cambridge.
Ebel, H. 1856. “Zur griechischen Lautlehre.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 5:61–68.
Ebeling, H. 1880-1885. Lexicon Homericum. 2 vols. Leipzig.
Eberhard, E. 1889. “Die Partikel καί im homerischen Verse.” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 40:581–599.
Ebhardt, K. 1866. Der rhetorische Schluß und seine Anwendung in den Schriften der Griechen und Römer. Weilburg.
———. 1877. Die sprachlichen Formen mit welchen die Glieder des Schlusses im Griechischen und Lateinischen eingeführt werden. Weilburg.
———. 1880. Der rhetorische Schluss: 2 Abhandlungen. Weilburg.
Eco, U. 1990. “Presuppositions.” In The Limits of Interpretation, ed. U. Eco, 222–262. Bloomington.
Edmunds, L. 1975. Chance and Intelligence in Thucydides. Cambridge, MA.
———. 1992. “The Blame of Karkinos: Theorizing Theatrical Space.” In Antike Dramentheorien und ihre Rezeption, ed. B. Zimmermann, 214–239. Stuttgart.
———. 2008. “Deixis in Ancient Greek and in Latin Literature: Historical Introduction and State of the Question.” Philologia Antiqua 1:67–98.
Edwards, M. W. 1966. “Some Features of Homeric Craftsmanship.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 97:115–179.
———. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary V. Cambridge.
———. 2002. Sound, Sense, and Rhythm: Listening to Greek and Latin Poetry. Princeton.
Ehlich, K. 1982. “Anaphora and Deixis: Same, Similar, or Different?” In Speech, Place, and Action, ed. R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein, 315–338. Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, and Singapore.
Eichholz, D. E. 1952. “A Curious Use of μέν.” Classical Review 2:144–145.
Ellendt, F. 1835. Lexicon Sophocleum [Vol. 1:; Vol: 2:]. Königsburg.
Elliott, A. 1969. Euripides. Medea. London.
Elmsley, P. 1821. Euripides. Bakchai. Oxford.
Emde Boas, E. van. 2010. Linguistic Studies in Euripides’ Electra. PhD diss., University of Oxford.
———. 2017a. “Analyzing Agamemnon: Conversation Analysis and Particles in Greek Tragic Dialogue.” Classical Philology 112:411–434.
———. 2017b. Language and character in Euripides' Electra. Linguistic studies in Euripides' Electra. Oxford.
Emde Boas, E. van, A. Rijksbaron, L. Huitink, M. de Bakker. 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge.
Emmott, C. 1997. Narrative Comprehension. Oxford.
Enfield, N. J. 2006. “Social Consequences of Common Ground.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. N. J. Enfield, and S. C. Levinson, 399–430. Oxford.
———. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford.
Enfield, N. J., and S. H. Levinson. 2006. Roots of Human Society. Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford.
Englebretson, R. 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam.
Erbse, H. 1980. “Zur normativen Grammatik der Alexandriner.” Glotta 58:236–258.
Erman, B. 2001. “Pragmatic Markers Revisited with a Focus on you know in Adult and Adolescent Talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 33:1337–1359.
Erp Taalman Kip, A. M. van. 1997. “H gar in Questions.” In Rijksbaron 1997:151–156. Amsterdam.
———. 2009. “Kai mên, kai dê and êdê in Τragedy and Comedy.” In Bakker and Wakker 2009:111–133. Leiden.
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. 1969. “Sociolinguistics.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 4:91–165.
Essen, M. H. N. von. 1887. Index Thucydideus. Berlin.
Estienne, H. 1572a. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae I. Paris.
———. 1572b. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae II. Paris.
———. 1572c. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae III. Paris.
———. 1572d. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae IV. Paris.
———. n.d. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae. Appendix. Paris.
Eucken, R. C. 1866. De Aristotelis dicendi ratione. Pars I: Observationes de particularum usu. Gottingen.
Evans, J. A. S. 1965. “Despotes Nomos.” Athenaeum 43:142–153.
Fabricius-Hansen, C. 1983. “Wieder ein wieder? Zur Semantik von wieder.” In Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, ed. A. von Bäuerle, R. Schwarze, and C. Stechow, 97–120. Berlin.
Fairbanks, B. G. 2009. Ojibwe Discourse Markers. PhD diss., University of Minnesota.
Fairclough, H. R. 1906. “A Study of ἆρα in Plato.” Proceedings of the American Philological Association 37:xlvi.
Falco, V. de. 1950. Sophocles. Aiace. Naples.
Farrar, F. W. 1867. A Brief Greek Syntax and Hints on Greek Accidence. London.
Feeney, D. 2011. “Hic finis fandi: On the Absence of Punctuation for the Endings (and Beginnings) of Speeches in Latin Poetic Texts.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 66:45–91.
Fehling, D. 1956. “Varro und die grammatische Lehre von der Analogie und der Flexion.” Glotta 35:214–270.
———. 1957. “Varro und die grammatische Lehre von der Analogie und der Flexion (2. Teil).” Glotta 36:48–100.
———. 1979. “Review of Siebenborn 1976.” Gnomon 51:488–490.
Feldman, J. A. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambride, MA.
Feldman, J. A., E. Dodge, and J. Bryant. 2010. “Embodied Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 111–137. Oxford.
Felson, Nancy. 1999. “Vicarious Transport in Pindar’s Pythian Four.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99:1–31.
———. 2004. “The Poetics of Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian IX.” In The Poetics of Deixis in Alcman, Pindar, and Other Lyric, ed. N. Felson, 365–89. Special issue, Arethusa 37.3. Baltimore.
———, ed. 2004. The Poetics of Deixis in Alcman, Pindar, and Other Lyric. Special issue, Arethusa 37.3. Baltimore.
Feng, G. 2010. A Theory of Conventional Implicature and Pragmatic Markers in Chinese. Bingley.
Ferguson, C. A. 1994. “Dialect, Register, and Genre: Working Assumptions about Conventionalization.” In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. D. Biber and E. Finegan, 15–30. New York.
Ferrara, K. W. 1997. “Form and Function of the Discourse Marker anyway: Implications for Discourse Analysis.” Linguistics 35:343–378.
Ferrari, A., L. Cignetti, A.-M. De Cesare, L. Lala, M. Mandelli, C. Ricci, and E. Roggia. 2008. L’ interfaccia lingua-testo: Natura e funzioni dell' articolazione informativa dell' enunciato. Alessandria.
Ferreira, F., and B. Swets. 2002. “How Incremental Is Language Production? Evidence from the Production of Utterances Requiring the Computation of Arithmetic Sums.” Journal of Memory and Language 46:57–84.
Ferretti, T. R., M. Kutas, and K. McRae. 2007. “Verb Aspect and the Activation of Event Knowledge.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 33:182–196.
Fielder, G. E. 2008. “Bulgarian Adversative Connectives: Conjunctions or Discourse Markers?” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. R. Laury, 79–97. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “Ama, a Bulgarian Adversative Connective.” In South Slavic Discourse Particles, ed. M. N. Dedaić and M. Mišković-Luković, 23–44. Amsterdam.
Fillmore, C. J. 1973. “May We Come In?” Semiotica 9:97–116.
———. 1976. “The Need for Frame Semantics within Linguistics.” Statistical Methods in Linguistics 12:5–29.
———. 1982. “Toward a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis.” In Speech, Place, and Action, ed. R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein, 31–59. Chichester.
Fillmore, C. J., and C. Baker. 2010. “A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 313–339. Oxford.
Fillmore, C. J., P. Kay, and M. C. O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64:501–538.
Fina, A. de, and A. Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative. Cambridge.
Finglass, P. J. 2011. Sophocles. Ajax. Cambridge.
Finkelberg, M. 1990. “A Creative Oral Poet and the Muse.” American Journal of Philology 111:293–303.
———, ed. 2011. The Homer Encyclopedia. 3 vols. Oxford.
Finley, J. H. 1939. “The Origins of Thucydides’ Style.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 50:35–84.
Finley, M. I. 1985. Ancient History: Evidence and Models. London.
Finnegan, R. 2011. Why Do We Quote? The Culture and History of Quotation. Cambridge.
Firth, A. 2009. “Ethnomethodology.” In The Pragmatics of Interaction, ed. S. d’Hondt, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 66–78. Amsterdam.
Fischer, K. 2000. “Discourse Particles, Turn-Taking, and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.” Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 8:111–137.
———. 2006a. “Frames, Constructions, and Invariant Meanings: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles.” In Fischer 2006:427–447. Amsterdam.
———. 2006b. “Towards an Understanding of the Spectrum of Approaches to Discourse Particles: Introduction to the Volume.” In Fischer 2006:1–19. Amsterdam.
———, ed. 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “Beyond the Sentence: Constructions, Frames and Spoken Interaction.” Constructions and Frames 2:185–207.
Fischer, K., and M. Alm. 2013. “A Radical Construction Grammar Perspective on the Modal Particle-Discourse Particle Distinction.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. L. Degand, B. Cornillie, and P. Pietrandrea, 47–88. Amsterdam.
Fishman, J. A. 1966. “Language Maintenance and Language Short as a Field of Inquiry.” In Language Loyalty in the United States, ed. J. A. Fishman, M. E. Haugen Einar Warshauer, R. G. Hayden, J. E. Hofman, V. C. Nahirny, 32–70. The Hague.
———. 1970. Sociolinguistics: A Brief Introduction. Rowley, MA.
Fisiak, J, ed. 1990. Historical Linguistics and Philology. Berlin.
Flacelière, R. 1970. Euripide. Medée. Paris.
Fleischman, S. 1986. “Evaluation in Narrative: The Present Tense in Medieval ‘Performed Stories.’” Yale French Studies 70:199–251.
———. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin.
———. 1997. “The ‘Labovian Model’ Revisited With Special Consideration of Literary Narrative.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7:159–168.
Fleischman, S., and M. Yaguello. 2004. “Discourse Markers across Languages: Evidence from English and French.” In Discourse Across Languages and Cultures, ed. C. L. Moder and A. Martinovic-Zic, 129–147. Amsterdam.
Fletcher, J. 2012. Performing Oaths in Classical Greek Drama. Cambridge.
Flothuis, M. H. 1929. Die Partikel in Wörtern, Redensarten und Sätzen. Eine idiomatische Darstellung. Groningen.
Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London.
———. 1995. “Middle English po and Other Narrative Discourse Markers.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. A. H. Jucker, 359–392. Amsterdam.
———. 1996. Towards a “Natural” Narratology. London.
———. 2000. “Narrative Discourse Markers in Malory’s Morte D’Arthur.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1:231–262.
Foley, H. P. 1999. “Modern Performance and Adaptation of Greek Tragedy.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 129:1–12.
———. 2003. “Choral Identity in Greek Tragedy.” Classical Philology 98:1–30.
Foley, J. M. 1990. Traditional Oral Epic: The Odyssey, Beowulf, and the Serbo-Croatian Return Song. Berkeley.
———. 1995. The Singer of Tales in Performance. Bloomington.
Foolen, A. 1991. “Polyfunctionality and the Semantics of Adversative Conjunctions.” Multilingua 10:79–92.
———. 1993. De betekenis van partikels: Een dokumentatie van de stand van het onderzoek, met bijzondere aandacht voor maar. Nijmegen.
———. 1994. “A Pragmatic Analysis of Norwegian Modal Particles.” Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 93:301–312.
———. 1996. “Pragmatic Particles.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. J.Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, and C. Bulcaen, 1–24. Amsterdam.
———. 2006. “Polysemy Patterns in Contrast: The Case of Dutch ‘Toch’ and German ‘Doch.’” In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, ed. K. Aijmer, and A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, 59–72. Oxford.
———. 2012. “The Relevance of Emotion for Language and Linguistics.” In Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, ed. A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine, and J. Zlatev, 349–368. Amsterdam.
Forbes, K. 1958. “The Relations of the Particle ἄν with κε(ν), κα, καν.” Glotta 37:179–182.
Ford, A. 1997. “The Inland Ship: Problems in the Performance and Reception of Homeric Epic.” In Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, ed. A. Kahane and E. J. Bakker, 138–166. Cambridge, MA.
Ford, C. E., B. A. Fox, and S. A. Thompson, eds. 2002. The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford.
Forman, L. L. 1897. Index Andocideus, Lycurgeus, Dinarcheus. Oxford.
Fowler, H. N., and W. R. M. Lamb. 1914. Plato. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Cambridge, MA.
Fowler, H. W. 1994. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Ware.
Fowler, H. W., and F. G. Fowler. 1906. The King’s English. Oxford.
Fox, A. 1973. “Tone-Sequences in English.” Archivum Linguisticum 4:17–26.
Fox, B. A. 1983. “The Discourse Function of the Participle in Ancient Greek.” In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, ed. F. Klein-Andreu, 23–41. New York.
———. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Written and conversational English. Cambridge.
Fox Tree, J. E. 2006. “Placing like in Telling Stories.” Discourse Studies 8:723–743.
Fraenkel, E. 1932. “Kolon und Satz I. Beobachtungen zur Gliederung des antiken Satzes.” Nachrichten der Göttinger Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 197–213.
———. 1933. “Kolon und Satz II. Beobachtungen zur Gliederung des Antiken Satzes.” Nachrichten der Göttinger Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 319–354.
———. 1950. Aeschylus. Agamemnon. Oxford.
———. 1964. Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie I. Rome.
———. 1965. Noch einmal Kolon und Satz. Munich.
———. 1977. Due seminari romani di Eduard Fraenkel: Aiace e Filottete di Sofocle. With a premise of L. E. Rossi. Rome.
Fragoulaki, M. 2013. Kinship in Thucydides: Intercommunal Ties and Historical Narrative. Oxford.
Franke, F. 1833. De usu particularum οὐδέ et οὔτε (= De particulis negantibus linguae graecae commentatio II). Rinteln.
Fränkel, H. 1921. Die homerischen Gleichnisse. Göttingen.
———. 1925. “Griechische Wörter: (4) περ.” Glotta 14:6–13.
———. 1926. “Der kallimachische und der homerische Hexameter.” Göttinger Nachrichten 2:197–229.
———. 1955. Wege und Formen frühgriechen Denkens: Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien. Munich.
Fränkel, J. J. 1947. “A Question in Connection with Greek Particles.” Mnemosyne 13:183–201.
Frascarelli, M. 2007. “Subjects, Topics and the Interpretation of Referential pro.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:691–734.
Fraser, Bruce. 1988. “Types of English Discourse Markers.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38:19–33.
———. 1990. “An Approach to Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 14:383–395.
———. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6:167–190.
———. 1999. “What Are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 31:931–952.
———. 2009. “Topic Orientation Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:892–898.
Fraser, Bruce (UK). 2001. “The Clause Start in Ancient Greek: Focus and the Second Position.” Glotta 77:138–177.
Fraser, B., and M. Malamud-Makowski. 1996. “English and Spanish Contrastive Discourse Markers.” Language Sciences 18:863–881.
Frazer, R. M. 1981. “Corrective ΗΤΟΙ in Homer and Hesiod.” Mnemosyne 34:265–271.
Frede, M. 1977. “The Origins of Traditional Grammar.” In Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, ed. R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka, 51–79. Dordrecht.
Frederking, A. 1882. “Sprachliche Kriterien für die Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge.” Jahrbuch für Klassische Philologie 125:534–541.
Freese, J. H. 1939. Aristotle, with and English translation: the “Art” of rhetoric. London.
Frege, G. 1892. “Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100:25–50.
Fried, M. 2009a. “Construction Grammar as a Tool for Diachronic Analysis.” Constructions and Frames 1:262–291.
———. 2009b. “Word Order.” In Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, ed. F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 289–300. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “Constructions and Frames as Interpretive Clues.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24:83–102.
Fried, M., and J.-O. Östman. 2004. “Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch.” In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. M. Fried and J.-O. Östman, 11–86. Amsterdam.
———. 2005. “Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37:1752–1778.
Friedländer, L. 1850. Nicanoris peri Iliakēs stigmēs reliquiae emendatiores. Königsberg.
———. 1859a. “Dissertationis de vocabulis homericis quae in alterutro carmine non inveniuntur.” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pedagogik 79:801–835.
———. 1859b. “Analecta Homerica.” Third supplement to Jahrbuch für Klassische Philologie: 457–484. Leipzig.
Friis Johansen, H., and E. W. Whittle. 1980. Aeschylus. The Suppliants. Copenhagen.
Frisk, H. 1946. “ΜΗΝΙΣ. Zur Geschichte eines Begriffes.” Eranos 44:28–40.
———. 1972. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg.
Fritsch, E. A. 1856. Vergleichende Bearbeitung der griechischen und lateinischen Partikeln. Giessen.
———. 1859. Nam, enim, etenim, ἄρα, γάρ. Wetzlar.
Fritzsche, F. 1897. De particulae οὐδέ usu Sophocleo. Rostock.
Frohberger, H. 1860. “Miscellen (δέ without preceding μέν).” Philology 15:342.
Fuami, S. 2009. “Well in Shakespeare: Discourse, Collocation and Text.” The Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA).
Fuchs, A. 1993. Remarks on Deixis. Heidelberg.
Fuhr, K. 1878. “Excurse zu den attischen Rednern (τε... καί: τε... τε: οὐ μέντοι: οὐ μήν).” Rheinisches Museum 33:578–599.
Führer, R. 2010. “τε.” In Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos IV, ed. B. Snell and H. J. Mette, 342–343. Göttingen.
Fujii, S. 2000. “Incipient Decategorization of MONO and Grammaticalization of Speaker Attitude in Japanese Discourse.” In Andersen and Fretheim 2000:85–118. Amsterdam.
Fulkerson, Laurel. 2013. No Regrets: Remorse in Classical Antiquity. Oxford.
Funkhaenel, K. H. 1847. “ὁ δέ, Etc., without Preceding μέν.” Zeitschrift für Altertumswissenschaften 5:1075–1079.
Furley, W. D. 2006. “Thucydides and Religion.” In Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, ed. A. Rengakos and A. Tsakmakis, 415–438. Leiden.
Furman, R., and A. Özyürek. 2007. “Development of Interactional Discourse Markers: Insights from Turkish Children’s and Adults’ Oral Narratives.” Journal of Pragmatics 39:1742–1757.
Gährken, B. 1950. Die Partikel γάρ. Münster.
Gaines, P. 2011. “The Multifunctionality of Discourse Operator okay: Evidence from a Police Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:3291–3315.
Gardner, R. 2005. “Conversation Analysis.” In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, ed. A. Davies and C. Elder, 262-284. Malden, MA.
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge.
Garvie, A. F. 1986. Aeschylus. Choephori. Oxford.
———. 1994. Homer, Odyssey Books VI-VIII. Cambridge.
———. 1998. Sophocles. Ajax. Warminster.
Garzya, A. 1953. Euripides. Andromacha. Leipzig.
Gebauer, G. 1877. De hypotacticis et paratacticis argumenti ex contrario formis quae reperiuntur apud oratores Atticos. Zwickau.
Geluykens, R. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Amsterdam.
Gelzer, T. 1960. Der epirrhematische Agon bei Aristophanes. Munich.
Genette, G. 1972. Figures 3. Paris.
Gentili, B, ed. 2013. Pindaro. Le Olimpiche. Rome.
Gentili, B., P. Angeli Bernardini, E. Cingano, and P. Giannini. 1995. Le Pitiche. Rome.
Gentili, B., and L. Lomiento. 2003. Metrica e ritmica: Storia delle forme poetiche nella Grecia Antica. Milan.
Gentili, B., and F. Perusino. 1999. Colometria antica dei testi poetici Greci I. Pisa.
Georgakopoulou, A. 1995. “Narrative Organisation and Contextual Constraints: The Case of Modern Greek Storytelling.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 5:161–189.
———. 1997. Narrative Performances: A Study of Modern Greek Storytelling. Amsterdam.
———. 2007. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Studies in Narrative 8. Amsterdam.
Georgakopoulou, A., and D. Goutsos. 1996. “Connectives as Discourse Markers in Greek.” Studies in Greek Linguistics 16:411–422.
———. 1998. “Conjunctions versus Discourse Markers in Greek: The Interaction of Frequency, Position, and Functions in Context.” Linguistics 36:887–917.
George, C. H. 2005. Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek. Cambridge.
———. 2009. “Greek Particles: Just a Literary Phenomenon?” In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. S. J. Bakker and G. C. Wakker, 155–169. Leiden.
Gerber, D. E. 1982. Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary. Toronto.
———. 2002. A Commentary on Pindar Olympian Nine. Stuttgart.
Gerö, E. C. 2000. “The Usage of an and ke in Ancient Greek: Towards a Unified Description.” Glotta 76:177–191.
Gerolemou, M. 2011. Bad Women, Mad Women. Classica Monacensia 40. Tübingen.
Gildersleeve, B. L. 1882. “Studies in Pindaric Syntax II. On AN and KEN in Pindar.” American Journal of Philology 3:446–455.
———. 1885. Pindar. The Olympian and Pythian Odes. London.
Gildersleeve, B. L., and P. Stork. 1980. Syntax of Classical Greek from Homer to Demosthenes. Groningen.
Giora, R. 1990. “On the so-Called Evaluative Material in Informative Texts.” Text 10:299–319.
———. “‘A Good Arab Is Not a Dead Arab – a Racist Incitement’: On the Accessibility of Negated Concepts.” In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, ed. I. Kecskes and L. R. Horn, 129–162. Berlin.
Giora, R., and N. Balaban. 2001. “Lexical Access in Text Production: On the Role of Salience in Metaphor Resonance.” In Text Representation, ed. T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, and W. Spooren, 111–124. Amsterdam.
Givón, T., ed. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam.
———. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction I. Amsterdam.
———. 1987. “Beyond Foreground and Background.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. R. S. Tomlin, 175–188. Amsterdam.
———, ed. 1997. Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives. Amsterdam.
———. 2005. Context as Other Minds: The Pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam.
Glück, H. 1993. Metzler Lexikon Sprache. Stuttgart.
Gobbo, F. del. 2003. Appositives at the Interface. PhD diss., University of California, Irvine.
Godley, A. D. 1920–1925. Herodotus. 4 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth.
———. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston.
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago.
———. 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford.
Goldhill, S. 2000. “Greek Drama and Political Theory.” In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. C. Rowe and M. Schofield, 60–88. Cambridge.
———. 2012. Sophocles and the Language of Tragedy. Oxford.
Goldstein, D. M. 2010. Wackernagel’s Law in Fifth-Century Greek. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
———. 2019. “Language change and linguistic theory: The case of archaic Indo-European conjunction.” Transactions of the Philological Society 117:1-34.
———. 2012. “Iterated Modal Marking and Polarity Focus in Ancient Greek.” Transactions of the Philological Society 110:1–25.
———. 2013a. “The Synchrony and Diachrony of a Scalar Coordinator: Latin nedum ‘let alone.’” Indo-European Linguistics 1:68–106.
———. 2013b. “Wackernagel’s Law and the Fall of the Lydian Empire.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 143:323–346.
———. 2016. Classical Greek Syntax: Wackernagel’s Law in Herodotus. Leiden.
Gomme, A. W., A. Andrewes, and K. J. Dover. 1945–1981. A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. 5 vols. Oxford.
Gomperz, Theodor. 1883. Herodoteische Studien. Vienna.
Gonda, J. 1954. “The History and Original Function of the Indo-European Particle kue, Especially in Greek and Latin.” Mnemosyne 7:177–214; 265–296.
———. 1956. The Character of the Indo-European Moods. Wiesbaden.
———. 1957. “The Original Value of Gr. -de.” Mnemosyne 10:97–102.
———. 1963. “Review of Moorhouse, Studies in the Greek Negatives.” Mnemosyne 16:289–293.
Gonzaga, M. 1926. “Paratactic Kai in the New Testament” Classical Journal 21:580–586.
González Merino, J. I. 1981. “Las partículas en Menandro.” Estudios Clásicos 25:163–184.
González, M. 2004. Pragmatic Markers in Oral Narrative: The Case of English and Catalan. Amsterdam.
Goodwin, C. 1996. “Transparent Vision.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson, 370–404. Cambridge.
Goodwin, W. W. 1889. Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb Rewritten and Enlarged. London.
Goody, E. N. 1995. Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence. Cambridge.
Goutsos, D. 1997. Modeling Discourse Topic: Sequential Relations and Strategies in Expository Text. Norwood, NJ.
Grafström, C. A. 1865. De usu particulae ἄρα apud Homerum. Uppsala.
Grassmann, H. 1877. “Ursprung der Präpositionen im Indogermanischen.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 23:559–579.
Graves, C. E. 1911. Aristophanes. The Clouds. Cambridge.
Graziosi, B., and J. Haubold. 2010. Homer. Iliad Book VI. Cambridge.
Green, E. L. 1901. “περ in Thucydides, Xenophon, and the Attic Orators.” Proceedings of the American Philological Association 32:135-136.
Green, G. M. 1996. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. 2nd ed. Mahwah.
Greenwood, E. 2006. Thucydides and the Shaping of History. London.
Grégoire, A. 1930. “Notes sur la place occupée par les particules γε et δέ dans la versification homérique.” In Serta leodiensia, ad celebrandam patriæ libertatem iam centesimvm annvm recvperatam composvervnt philologi leodienses, 159–176. Liège.
Grethlein, J. 2003. Asyl und Athen: Die Konstruktion kollektiver Identität in der griechischen Tragödie. Stuttgart.
———. 2007. “The Hermeneutics and Poetics of Memory in Aeschylus’s Persae.” Arethusa 40:363–396.
———. 2010. The Greeks and Their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BCE. Cambridge.
———. 2013a. “Choral Intertemporality in the Oresteia.” In Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy, ed. R. Gagné and M. Govers Hopman, 78–99. Cambridge.
———. 2013b. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: Futures Past from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge.
———. 2013c. “The Present of the Past in Thucydides.” In Thucydides Between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis and M. Tamiolaki, 91–118. Berlin.
Grethlein, J., and A. Rengakos, eds. 2009. Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature. Berlin.
Grice, H. P. 1957. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66:377–388.
———. 1961. “The Causal Theory of Perception.” Supplementary volume, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 35:121–152.
———. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, 41–58. New York.
———. 1981. “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. P. Cole, 183–198. New York.
———. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA.
Griffith, M. 1999. Sophocles. Antigone. Cambridge.
———. 2001. “Antigone and Her Sister(s): Embodying Women in Greek Tragedy.” In Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society, ed. A. P. M. H. Lardinois and L. McClure, 117–136. Princeton.
Grimm, J. 1962. “Die Partikel ara im frühen griechischen Epos.” Glotta 40:3–41.
Groeneboom, P. 1930. Aeschylus’ Persae. Groningen.
———. 1938. Aeschylus’ Zeven Tegen Thebe. Groningen.
———. 1949. Aeschylus’ Choephori. Groningen.
———. 1952. Aeschylus’ Eumenides. Groningen.
———. 1966 [1944]. Aeschylus' Agamemnon. Amsterdam.
Groningen, B. A. van. 1937. Paratactische Compositie in de Oudste Grieksche Literatuur. Amsterdam.
———. 1958. La composition littéraire archaïque grecque: Procédés et réalisations. Amsterdam.
Grosheide, F. W. 1915. “Kai Gar in het Nieuwe Testament.” Theologische Studien 33:108–110.
Gross, A. 1905. “Sprachgebrauch in der Stichomythie.” In Die Stichomythie in der griechischen Tragoedie und Komoedie, 82–94. Berlin.
Grosse, E. 1858. Quaest. gramm. de part. Graec. specimen. I. De particulis copulativis τε et καί apud Pindarum. Aschersleben.
Grosz, B. J., and C. L. Sidner. 1986. “Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics 12:175–204.
Gruber, W. E. 1986. Comic Theaters: Studies in Performance and Audience Response. Athens, GA.
Grundy, P. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. London.
Guiraud, C. 1962. La phrase nominale en grec d’Homère à Euripide. Paris.
Gumbrecht, H. U. 2003. Die Macht der Philologie: über einen verborgenen Impuls im wissenschaftlichen Umgang mit Texten. Frankfurt.
Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge.
Gundel, J. K. 2010. “Reference and Accessibility from a Givenness Hierarchy Perspective.” International Review of Pragmatics 2:148–168.
Gundel, J. K., and T. Fretheim. 2002. Information Structure. Amsterdam.
Gundel, J. K., N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.” Language 69:274–307.
———. 2012. “Underspecification of Cognitive Status in Reference Production: Some Empirical Predictions.” Topics in Cognitive Science 4:249–268.
Günthner, S. 2008. “Projektorkonstruktionen im Gespräch: Pseudoclefts, ‘Die Sache ist-’ Konstruktionen und Extrapositionen mit ‘es’.” Gesprächsforschung 9:86–114.
———. 2011. “Between Emergence and Sedimentation: Projecting Constructions in German Interactions.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. P. Auer and S. Pfänder, 156-185. Berlin.
———. 2012. “Eine interaktionale Perspektive auf Wortarten: das Beispiel ‘und zwar.’” In Nicht-flektierende Wortarten, ed. B. Rothstein, 14-47. Berlin and New York.
Günthner, S., W. Imo, and J. Bücker. 2014. Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation. Linguistik - Impulse & Tendenzen 61. Berlin.
Gusmani, R. 1967. “Zwei Kyprische Konjunktionen.” Glotta 45:19–25.
Guy, G. R., C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, and J. Baugh, eds. 1997. Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov. Amsterdam.
Haacke, A. 1857. Quaestionum Homericarum capita duo. Tome 1: De particula ἄρα. Nordhausen.
Habinek, T. N. 1985. The Colometry of Latin Prose. Classical Studies  25. Berkeley.
Haddington, P. 2004. “Stance Taking in News Interviews.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 17:101–142.
Hadley, W. S. 1889. The Hippolytus of Euripides. Cambridge.
Haegeman, L. 1993. “The Interpretation of the Particle da in West Flemish.” Lingua 90:111–128.
Hafez, O. M. 1991. “Turn-Taking in Egyptian Arabic: Spontaneous Speech vs. Drama Dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 15:59–81.
Haiman, J., and S. A. Thompson, eds. 1988. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam.
Hainsworth, B. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary IV. Cambridge.
Hajdú, I. 1989. Über die Stellung der Enklitika und Quasi-Enklitika bei Pindar und Bakchylides. Lund.
Hajnal, I. 2004. “E-ke-qe oder e-ke? – Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in den Mykenischen Palastarchiven.” In Analecta homini universali dicata. Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. T. Krisch, T. Lindner, U. Müller, 233–251. Stuttgart.
Hakulinen, A. 1998. “The Use of Finnish nyt as a Discourse Particle.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:83–96. Amsterdam.
———. 2001. “On Some Uses of the Discourse Particle ‘kyl(lä)’ in Finnish Conversation.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 171–198. Amsterdam.
Hall, E. 1996. Aeschylus. Persians. Warminster.
Hall, E., and A. Wrigley, eds. 2007. Aristophanes in Performance, 421 BC-AD 2007: Peace, Birds and Frogs. London.
Halla-aho, H., and P. Kruschwitz. 2010. “Colloquial and Literary Language in Early Roman Tragedy.” In Colloquial and Literary Latin, ed. E. Dickey and A. Chahoud, 133–159. Cambridge.
Halleran, M. R. 1995. Euripides. Hippolytus. Warminster.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English, Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3:199–244.
———. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London.
———. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Oxford.
Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London.
Hammer, B. 1904. De τε particulae usu Herodoteo, Thucydideo, Xenophonteo. Leipzig.
Hammond, M. 2009. Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Translated by M. Hammond with an Introduction and Notes by P. J. Rhodes. Oxford.
Han, D. 2011. “Utterance Production and Interpretation: A Discourse-Pragmatic Study on Pragmatic Markers in English Public Speeches.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:2776–2794.
Hancock, J. L. 1917. Studies in Stichomythia. Chicago.
Hand, F. 1824. De particulis Graecis dissertatio secunda. De particula τε cum aliis vocabulis coniuncta. Jena.
Hanks, W. F. 1989. “Text and Textuality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 18:95–127.
———. 1993. “Metalanguage and Pragmatics of Deixis.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. J. A. Lucy, 122–157. Cambridge.
Hannay, M., and C. H. M. Kroon. 2005. “Acts and the Relationship between Discourse and Grammar.” Functions of Language 12:87–124.
Hansen, M.-B. M. 1996. “Eh bien: Marker of Comparison and Contrast.” In Content, Expression and Structure: Studies in Danish Functional Grammar, ed. E. Engberg-Pedersen, M. Fortescue, P. Harder, L. Heltoft, and L. Falster Jakobsen, 315–342. Amsterdam.
———. 1997. “Alors and Donc in Spoken French: A Reanalysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 28:153–187.
———. 1998a. The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam.
———. 1998b. “The Semantic Status of Discourse Markers.” Lingua 104:235–260.
———. 2002. “From Aspectuality to Discourse Marking: The Case of French ‘déjà’ and ‘encore.’” Belgian journal of linguistics 16:23–51.
———. 2008. Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs. Amsterdam.
Hansen, M.-B. M., and E. Strudsholm. 2008. “The Semantics of Particles: Advantages of a Contrastive and Panchronic Approach: A Study of the Polysemy of French déjà and Italian già.” Linguistics 46:471–505.
Hansen, W. F. 2002. Ariadne’s Thread : A Guide to International Tales Found in Classical Literature. Ithaca.
Harder, P. 1996. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin.
Harlfinger, D., and G. Prato, eds. 1991. Paleografia e codicologia greca. Atti del II colloquio internazionale. Alessandria.
Harrison, R. R. 2007. “A Structural Arrangement of Text to Facilitate Reading.” The Classical Journal 102:291–303.
Harry, J. E. 1902. “Indicative Questions with μή and ἆρα μή.” Bulletin, University of Cincinnati 7:427-434. [reprinted from Studies in Honor of B. L. Gildersleeve, 1902, Baltimore]
Hartel, W. von. 1874. “Homerische Studien II.” Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 76:329–376.
Hartung, J. A. 1828. Commentatio de particulis δή et ἤδη. Erlangen.
———. 1832-1833. Lehre von den Partikeln der griechischen Sprache. Erlangen.
Haslam, M. W. 2013. “New Readings at Iliad 4.511 and 512?” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 184:1–3.
Havelock, E. A. 1963. Preface to Plato. Oxford.
Havet, L. 1923. “Notes critiques sur Eschyle. Enquête sur τε et δέ dans les tragédies d’Eschyle étrangères à l’Orestie.” Revue de Philologie 47:108–140.
Haviland, J. B. 2007. “Person Reference in Tzotzil Gossip: Referring Dupliciter.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. N. J. Enfield and T. Stivers, 226–252. Cambridge.
Hawkins, J. 1977. “The Pragmatics of Definiteness.” Linguistische Berichte 47:1–27.
Hayashi, M. 2013. “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 167–190. Malden, MA.
Heath, M. 1988. “Receiving the Kômos, the Context and Performance of Epinician.” American Journal of Philology 109:180–195.
Heine, B. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 51:1205–1247.
Heinemann, T. 2008. “Questions of Accountability: Yes-no Interrogatives that are Unanswerable.” Discourse Studies 10:55–71.
Heinze, H. 1878. “Griechisches τε... καί.” Wissenschaftliche Monatsblätter 6:150–151.
Held, G. 1992. “Politeness in Linguistic Research.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, ed. R. J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich, 131–153. Berlin.
———. 2003. Partikeln und Höflichkeit. Frankfurt.
Hell, J. G. van, L. Verhoeven, M. Tak, and M. van Oosterhout. 2005. “To Take a Stance: A Developmental Study of the Use of Pronouns and Passives in Spoken and Written Narrative and Expository Texts in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 37:239–273.
Heller, H. 1853. “Epistola ad Max. Dunkerum de particulis ἤδη et δή.” Philologus 8:254–308.
Heller, J. C. 1858. “De Particula ἄρα.” Philologus 13:68–121.
Hellwig, A. 1974. “Zur Funktion und Bedeutung der griechischen Partikeln.” Glotta 52:145–171.
Hemmerdinger, B. 1955. Essai sur l’histoire du texte de Thucydide. Collection d’études anciennes. Paris.
———. 1981. Les manuscrits d’Hérodote et la critique verbale. Pubblicazioni dell’Istituto di filologia classica e medievale  72. Genoa.
Henderson, J. 1987. Aristophanes’ Lysistrata. Oxford.
———. 1998a. Aristophanes. Acharnians, Knights. London.
———. 1998b. Aristophanes. Clouds, Wasps, Peace. London.
———. 2000. Aristophanes. Birds, Lysistrata, Women at the Thesmophoria. London.
———. 2002. Aristophanes. Frogs, Assemblywomen, Wealth. London.
Hengeveld, K. 2004. “The Architecture of a Functional Discourse Grammar.” In A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, ed. J. L. Mackenzie and M. de los Ángeles Gómez-González, 1–22. Berlin.
Hengeveld, K., and J. L. Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford.
Hentschel, E., and H. Weydt. 1989. “Wortartenprobleme bei Partikeln.” In Sprechen mit Partikeln, ed. H. Weydt, 3–18. Berlin.
Herbst, L. 1867. “Thukydides.” Philology 24:610–730.
Heritage, J. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. J. Heritage and J. M. Atkinson, 299–345. Cambridge.
———. 1998. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27:291–334.
———. 2002. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. C. Ford, B. Fox, and S. Thompson, 196–224. Oxford.
———. 2010. “Conversation Analysis: Practices and Methods.” In Qualitative Sociology, ed. D. Silverman, 208–230. 3rd ed. London.
Heritage, J., and J. M. Atkinson. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge.
Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Subjective Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68:15–38.
Heritage, J., and M.-L. Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23:1–29.
Herman, D. 2002. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln, NE.
———, ed. 2003. Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Stanford.
———. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge.
———. 2009a. Basic Elements of Narrative. Chichester.
———. 2009b. “Beyond Voice and Vision: Cognitive Grammar and Focalization Theory.” In Point of View, Perspective, Focalization: Modeling Mediacy, ed. P. Hühn, W. Schmid, and J. Schönert, 119–142. Berlin.
———. 2010. “Directions in Cognitive Narratology: Triangulating Stories, Media, and the Mind.” In Postclassical Narratology: Approaches and Analyses, ed. J. Alber and M. Fludernik, 137–162. Columbus.
———. 2011. The Emergence of Mind : Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English. Lincoln, NE.
Hermann, E. 1912. Griechische Forschungen I. Die Nebensätze in den griechischen Dialektinschriften. Leipzig.
Hermann, G. 1799. Aristophanis Nubes cum scholiis. Leipzig.
Hermann, J. G. J. 1823. Euripidis Bacchae. Leipzig.
———. 1825. Sophocles. Oedipus Coloneus. 1st ed. Leipzig.
———. 1831. Libri IV de particula ἄν. Leipzig.
———. 1852. Aeschyli Tragoediae. Leipzig.
Herwerden, H. van. 1866. Sophoclis Oedipus Rex. Utrecht.
———. 1902. Lexicon Graecum suppletorium et dialecticum. Leiden.
Hesk, J. 2003. Sophocles. Ajax. London.
———. 2006. “Homeric Flyting and How to Read It: Performance and Intratext in Iliad 20.83-109 and 20.178-258.” Ramus 35:4–28.
———. 2007. “Combative Capping in Aristophanic Comedy.” Cambridge Classical Journal 53:124–160.
Hewings, A. 2012. “Stance and Voice in Academic Discourse across Channels.” In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ed. K. Hyland and C. Sancho Guinda, 187–201. Basingstoke.
Heyworth, S. J. 2007. Sexti Properti elegos: critico apparatu instructos. Oxford.
Hickie, W. J. 1853. The Comedies of Aristophanes. London.
Hilgard, A., ed. 1901. Grammatici Graeci I.3: Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem Grammaticam. Grammatici Graeci I.3. Leipzig.
Hiller, E. 1886. “Die Partikel ῥα.” Hermes 21:563–569.
Hilton, J. 1997. “The Role of Discourse and Lexical Meaning in the Grammaticalisation of Temporal Particles in Latin.” Glotta 74:198–210.
Hinrichs, G. 1875. De Homericae Elocutionis Vestigiis Aeolicis: Dissertatio Inauguralis Philologica. Jena.
Hirschberg, J. 2006. “Pragmatics and Intonation.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. L. R. Horn and G. Ward, 515–537. Malden, MA.
Hobbes, T. 1723. The History of the Grecian War: In Eight Books; Written by Thucydides; Faithfully Translated from the Original by Thomas Hobbes of Malmsbury; With Maps Describing the Country. 2 vols. 3rd ed. London.
Hoefer, H. 1882. De particulis Platonicis capita selecta. Bonn.
Hoekstra, A. 1965. Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes. Amsterdam.
Hoey, M. 1979. Signalling in Discourse. Birmingham.
Hoffmann, K. 1967. Der Injunktiv im Veda. Heidelberg.
Hoffmann, T., and G. Trousdale, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford.
Hoffmann, V. 1880. De Particularum Nonnullarum apud Herodotum Usu. Halle.
———.1884. Über den Gebrauch der Partikel ὦν bei Herodot. Piła.
Hogan, P. C. 2010. “Fictions and Feelings: On the Place of Literature in the Study of Emotion.” Emotion Review 2:184–195.
———. 2011. What Literature Teaches Us about Emotion. Cambridge.
Hogeweg, L. 2009a. “The Meaning and Interpretation of the Dutch Particle wel.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:519–539.
———. 2009b. “What’s So Unreal about the Past? Past Tense and Counterfactuals.” In Studies on English Modality: In Honour of Frank Palmer, ed. A. Tsangalidis and R. Facchinetti, 181–208. Bern.
———. 2009c. Word in Process. On the Interpretation, Acquisition, and Production of Words. Nijmegen.
Hohti, P. 1976. The Interrelation of Speech and Action in the Histories of Herodotus. Helsinki.
Hölker, K. 1990. “Französisch: Partikelforschung.” In Lexikon Der Romanistischen Linguistik V-1, 77–88. Tübingen.
Hollmann, W. B. 2013. “Constructions in Cognitive Sociolinguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale. Oxford Handbooks Online.
Holmes, D. H. 1895. Index Lysiacus. Bonn.
Holmes, J. 1986. “Functions of you know in Women’s and Men's Speech.” Language in Society 15:1–22.
Holmes, N. 2011. “Interrogative nam in Early Latin.” Mnemosyne 65:203–218.
Hoogeveen, H. 1769. Doctrina Particularum Linguae Graecae. [Vol. 1:; Vol. 2:]. Leiden.
Hopper, P J. 1979. “Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. T. Givón, 213–41. New York.
———. 1988. “Emergent Grammar and the A Priori Grammar Postulate.” In Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding : Lectures from the 1985 LSA/TESOL and NEH Institutes, ed. D. Tannen, 117–134. Norwood, NJ.
———. 2004. “The Openness of Grammatical Constructions.” In Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 40:153–175.
———. 2011. “Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. P. Auer and S. Pfänder, 22–45. Berlin.
Hopper, P. J., and S. A. Thompson. 1984. “The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar.” Language 60:703–752.
———. 2008. “Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining, ed. R. Laury, 99–123. Amsterdam.
Hopper, P. J., and E. Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge.
Horie, P. I., and S. Iwasaki. 1996. “Register and Pragmatic Particles in Thai Conversation.” In Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, January 8-10, ed. S. Premsrirat Iam Thongdee et al., 1197–1205. Bangkok.
Horn, L. R. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
———. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. 2nd ed. Stanford.
Horn, L. R., and G. L. Ward, eds. 2006. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden, MA.
Horn, W. 1926. Quaestiones ad Xenophontis elocutionem pertinentes. Halle.
Hornblower, S. 1987. Thucydides. London.
———. 1991–1998. A Commentary on Thucydides. 3 vols. Oxford.
———. 1994. “Narratology and Narrative Techniques in Thucydides.” In Greek Historiography, ed. S. Hornblower, 131–166. Oxford.
Horrocks, G. 1997. “Bibliography.” In Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers, 366–380. London.
How, W. W., and J. Wells. 1928. A Commentary on Herodotus, with Introduction and Appendixes. Oxford.
Huang, Y. 1991. “A Neo-Gricean Pragmatic Theory of Anaphora.” Journal of Linguistics 27:301–335.
———. 2006. “Anaphora, Cataphora, Exophora, Logophoricity.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed. Amsterdam.
———. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford.
———. 2010. “Neo-Gricean Pragmatic Theory of Conversational Implicature.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 607–631. Oxford.
Huart, P. 1968. Le vocabulaire de l’analyse psychologique dans l'oeuvre de Thucydide. Paris.
Hübner, E. 1883. Grundriss zu Vorlesungen über die griechische Syntax. Berlin.
Hude, K. 1901. “Über γάρ in appositiven Ausdrücken.” Hermes 36:313–315.
———. 1904. “Über γάρ in appositiven Ausdrücken.” Hermes 39:476–477.
Hudson, J. 1696. Thoukudidou peri tou peloponnēsiakou polemou biblia oktō. Thucydidis de bello peloponnesiaco libri octo. Oxford.
Huitink, L. 2009. “Pragmatic Presupposition and Complementation in Ancient Greek.” In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. G. C. Wakker S. J. Bakker, 21–40. Leiden.
———. 2012. Reported Discourse in Classical Greek: Grammatical Form and Communicative Function. PhD diss., University of Oxford.
Humbert, J. 1960. Syntaxe grecque. 3rd ed. Paris.
Hummel, P. 1993. La syntaxe de Pindare. Louvain.
Humphreys, M. W. 1897. “Notes on Greek Grammar.” Classical Review 11:138–141.
Humphreys, S. 1987. “Law, Custom and Culture in Herodotus.” Arethusa 20:211–220.
Hunston, S., and G. Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford.
Hunter, V. 1973. Thucydides: The Artful Reporter. Toronto.
———. 1988. “Thucydides and the Sociology of the Crowd.” The Classical Journal 84:17–30.
Hutchinson, G. O. 1985. Aeschylus. Septem Contra Thebas. Oxford.
Hymes, D. 1977. “Discovering Oral Performance and Measured Verse in American Indian Narrative.” New Literary History 8:431–457.
———. 1997. “On Communicative Competence.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. A. Duranti, 53–73. 2nd ed. Cambridge.
Hymes, D., R. Bauman, and J. Sherzer. 1989. “Ways of Speaking.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, 433–451. 2nd ed. Cambridge.
Ifantidou, E. 2000. “Procedural encoding of explicatures by the Modern Greek particle taha.” In Andersen and Fretheim 2000:119–143.
———. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam.
Ifantidou-Trouki, E. 1993. “Sentential Adverbs and Relevance.” Lingua 90:69–90.
Immerwahr, H. R. 1954. “Historical Action in Herodotus.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 85:16–45.
———. 1966. Form and Thought in Herodotus. American Philological Association Monograph 23. Cleveland.
Imo, W. 2005. “A Construction Grammar Approach to the Phrase ‘I mean’ in Spoken English.” InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures 42:
———. 2007. Construction Grammar und Gesprochene-Sprache-Forschung. Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 275. Tübingen.
———. 2008. “Individuelle Konstrukte oder Vorboten einer neuen Konstruktion? Stellungsvarianten der Modalpartikel halt im Vor- und Nachfeld.” In Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik, ed. A. Stefanowitsch and K. Fischer, 135–156. Tübingen.
———. 2013. Sprache in Interaktion: Analysemethoden und Untersuchungsfelder. Berlin.
Ingalls, W. B. 1979. “Formular Density in the Similes of the Iliad.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 109:87–109.
Inglese, G. 2018. “Connectives and discourse markers in Ancient Greek: The diachrony of atár from Homeric Greek to Classical Attic.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 18:93–123.
Ingria, R. 2005. “Grammatical Formatives in a Generative Lexical Theory: The Case of Modern Greek και.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 6:61–101.
Ireland, S. 1974. “Stichomythia in Aeschylus: The Dramatic Role of Syntax and Connecting Particles.” Hermes 102:509–524.
Irigoin, J. 1953. Recherches sur les mètres de la lyrique chorale grecque. Paris.
Irmscher, J. 1950. Götterzorn bei Homer. Leipzig.
Italie, G. 1953. Aeschylus. Perzen. Leiden.
———. 1955. Index Aeschyleus. Leiden.
Itani, R. 1993. “The Japanese Sentence-Final Particle ka: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Lingua 90:129–147.
Itsumi, K. 2009. Pindaric Metre: The “Other Half.” Oxford.
Izutsu, K., and M. N. Izutsu. 2013. “From Discourse Markers to Modal/final Particles: What the Position Reveals about the Continuum.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. L. Degand, B. Cornillie, and P. Pietrandrea, 217–236. Amsterdam.
Jääskeläinen, A. 2013. Todisteena äänen kuva. Suomen kielen imitatiivikonstruktiot [Imitations of sounds as evidence: the constructions of imitatives in the Finnish language]. PhD diss., University of Helsinki.
Jacquinod, B. 1997. “Sur le rôle pragmatique de kaitoi.” In Rijksbaron 1997:131–149. Amsterdam.
Jahn, C. F. 1847. Grammaticorum Graecorum de coniunctibus doctrina. Greifswald.
Janko, R. M. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary IV. Cambridge.
Jannaris, A. N. 1897. An Historical Greek Grammar. London.
Jeannerod, M. 2001. “Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition.” Neuroimage 14:103–109.
Jebb, R. C. 1888. Sophocles. Antigone. Cambridge.
———. 2004 [1892]. Sophocles. Plays: Trachiniae. Ed. P. E. Easterling and B. Goward. London.
———. 2004 [1893]. Sophocles. Plays: Oedipus Tyrannus. Ed. P. E. Easterling and J. S. Rusten. London.
———. 2004 [1896]. Sophocles. Plays: Ajax. Ed. P. E. Easterling and P. Wilson. London.
Jefferson, G. 1983. “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mmhm.’” Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 30:1–18.
Jespersen, O. 1933. “Monosyllabism in English.” In Linguistica: Selected Papers in English, French and German, 384–408. Copenhagen.
Jiménez Delgado, J. M. 2012. “οὕτως recapitulativo en Heródoto.” In Lingüística XL. El Lingüista Del Siglo XXI, ed. A. Cabedo Nebot and P. Infante Ríos, 133–140. Madrid.
———. 2013. “Adverbios temporales como conectores con valor consecutivo en griego antiguo.” Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Griegos e Indoeuropeos 23:31–52.
———. 2013. “Καὶ μάλα: Estructurus de focalización y polaridad positiva.” Veleia 30:249–258.
———. 2014. “Adverbios, partículas y marcadores del discurso: αὖ y αὖθις en los historiadores griegos.” Emerita 82:223–247.
Johnson, W. A. 1994. “The Function of the Paragraphus in Greek Literary Prose Texts.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 100:65–68.
———. 2004. Bookrolls and Scribes in Oxyrhynchus. Studies in Book and Print Culture. Toronto.
Johnstone, B. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA.
Jones, W. H. S. 1910. “καὶ οὐ, ἀλλ᾽ οὐ, οὐδέ.” Classical Review 24:51.
Jong, I. J. F. de. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.
———. 1991. Narrative in Drama: The Art of the Euripidean Messenger-Speech. Leiden.
———. 1997. “Gar Introducing Embedded Narratives.” In Rijksbaron 1997:175–85. Amsterdam.
———. 2001a. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.
———. 2001b. “The Origins of Figural Narration in Antiquity.” In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, ed. W. van Peer and S. Chatman, 67–81. New York.
———. 2004a. “Herodotus.” In Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. I. J. F. de Jong, R. Nünlist, and A. M. Bowie, 101-114. Leiden.
———. 2004b. Narrators and Focalizers. 2nd ed. London.
———. 2007. “Sophocles’ Trachiniae 1–48, Euripidean Prologues, and Their Audiences.” In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. R. J. Allan, M. Buijs, A. Rijksbaron, and I. J. F. de Jong, 7–28. Leiden.
———, ed. 2007. Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Leiden.
———. 2009. “Metalepsis in Ancient Greek Literature.” In Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, ed. A. Rengakos and J. Grethlein, 87–115. Berlin.
———. 2012. Homer. Iliad, Book XXII. Cambridge.
———, ed. 2012. Space in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Leiden.
———. 2013. “Narratological Aspects of the Histories of Herodotus.” In Herodotus and the Narrative of the Past, ed. R. Vignolo Munson, 253–291. New York.
———. 2014. Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford.
Jong, I. J. F. de., R. Nünlist, and A. Bowie, eds. 2004. Narrators, narratees, and narratives in ancient Greek literature: studies in ancient Greek narrative. Leiden).
Jong, I. J. F. de., and J. P. Sullivan, eds. 1994. Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.
Jonge, C. C. de. 2008. Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.
———. 2009. “Review of Marini, N., ed., 2007, Demetrio, Lo Stile. Pleiadi 4.” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.08.12.
———. 2015. “Grammatical Theory and Rhetorical Teaching.” In Brill’s Companion to Ancient Scholarship, ed. F. Montanari and A. Rengakos, 979–1011. Leiden.
Jonker, D.-E. 2014. “Oh, well, you know, do not you? Socio-Historical Discourse Analysis of Jane Austen’s Fictional Works.” MA thesis, Leiden University.
Joost, A. 1895. “Beobachtungen über den Partikelgebrauch Lucians.” In Festschrift zum fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläum Ludwig Friedländer, ed. H. Baumgart, 163–182. Leipzig.
Jowett, B. 1881. Thucydides. 2 vols. Oxford.
Jucker, A. H. 1993. “The Discourse Marker well: A Relevance-Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 19:435–452.
———, ed. 1995. Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 35. Amsterdam.
———. 1997. “The Discourse Marker well in the History of English.” English Language and Linguistics 1:91–110.
———. 2002. “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English.” In Alternative Histories of English, ed. R. Watts and P. Trudgill, 210–230. London.
———. 2010. “Historical Pragmatics.” In Variation and Change: Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. M. Fried, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 110–122. Amsterdam.
Jucker, A. H., and Y. Ziv, eds. 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam.
———. 1998. “Discourse Markers: Introduction.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:1–12. Amsterdam.
Jung, V. 1991. Thukydides und die Dichtung. Frankfurt.
Jungermann, G. 1608. [Hērodotou Halikarnassēos Historiōn logoi 9, epigraphomenoi Mousai. Tou autou exegēsis peri tēs Homerou biotēs.] = Herodoti Halicarnassei Historiarum libri IX, IX Musarum nominibus inscripti. Eiusdem narratio de vita Homeri. Editio adornata opera & studio Gothofredi Jungermani. Frankfurt.
Jurk, J. 1900. Ramenta Hippocratea. Berlin.
Juslin, P. N. 2013. “Vocal Affect Expression: Problems and Promises.” In The Evolution of Emotional Communication: From Sounds in Nonhuman Mammals to Speech and Music in Man, ed. E. Altenmüller, S. Schmidt, and E. Zimmermann, 252–273. Oxford.
Kachru, B. B., S. Saporta, R. B. Lees, Y. Malkiel, and A. Pietrangeli, eds. 1973. Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane. Urbana.
Kahane, A. 1994. The Interpretation of Order: A Study in the Poetics of Homeric Repetition. Oxford.
Kakridis, P. I. 1974. Aristophanous. Ornithes. Athens.
Kalinka, E. 1890. “De usu coniunctionum quarundam apud scriptores Atticos antiquissimos.” In Dissertationes Philologae Vindobonenses, 145–212. Vienna.
Kallenberg, H. 1886. “Herodot (Jahresberichte des philologischen Vereins zu Berlin).” Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 40:294–328.
———. 1897. “Herodot.” Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 51:167–222.
———. 1913. “Ὅτι und ὡς bei Plato als Hilfsmittel zur Bestimming der Zeitfolge seiner Schriften.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 68:465–476.
Kallet, L. 2001. Money and the Corrosion of Power in Thucydides: The Sicilian Expedition and Its Aftermath. Berkeley.
Kambylis, A. 1964. Anredeformen bei Pindar. Athens.
Kamerbeek, J. C. 1953. Sophocles: Ajax. Leiden.
———. 1959. Sophocles. Trachiniae. Leiden.
———. 1967. Sophocles. Oedipus Tyrannus. Leiden.
———. 1978. Sophocles. Antigone. Leiden.
Kannicht, R. 1969. Euripides. Helena. Herausgegeben und erklärt von Richard Kannicht. Heidelberg.
Kapatsinski, V. 2010. “Frequency of Use Leads to Automaticity of Production: Evidence from Repair in Conversation.” Language and Speech 53:71–105.
Kärkkäinen, E. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on “I think.” Amsterdam.
Karttunen, L. 1974. “Presupposition and Linguistic Context.” Theoretical Linguistics 1:181–194.
Karttunen, L., and S. Peters. 1979. “Conventional Implicature.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 11: Presuppositions, ed. C. Oh and D. Dineen, 1–56. New York.
Kaster, R. A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Classical Culture and Society. Oxford.
Katsures, A. G. 1975. Linguistic and Stylistic Characterization: Tragedy and Menander. Ioannina.
Katz, J. T. 2007. “The Epic Adventures of an Unknown Particle.” In Greek and Latin from an Indo-European Perspective, ed. C. H. George, 65–79. Cambridge.
Kayser, W. C. 1862. “Der Text der homerischen Gedichte. Jahresbericht.” Philologus 18:647–704.
Keelhoff, J. 1892. “εἰ δ᾽ οὖν peut-il être synonyme de εἰ δὲ μή?” Revue de l’instruction publique en Belgique 35:161–176.
Keevallik, L. 2008. “Conjunction and Sequenced Actions: The Estonian Complementizer and Evidential Particle et.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. R. Laury, 125–152. Amsterdam.
Keil, H. 1857–1880. Grammatici Latini. 8 vols. Leipzig.
Kemp, A. 1987. “The Téchnē Grammatikḗ of Dionysius Thrax.” In The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period, ed. D. J. J. D. Taylor, 169–189. Amsterdam.
Kent, A. 2012. “Compliance, Resistance and Incipient Compliance When Responding to Directives.” Discourse Studies 14:711–730.
Kerschensteiner, J. 1964. “Zum Gebrauch der Parenthese bei Herodot.” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 17:29–50.
Keysar, B., D. J. Barr, J. A. Balin, and T. S. Paek. 1998. “Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 39:1–20.
Kienpointner, M., ed. 1999. Ideologies of Politeness. Special issue, Pragmatics 9.
Kim, H. 2004. “Really as a Free-Standing TCU in English Conversation.” Language Research 40:861–883.
King, B. 1992. “On the Meaning of Empty Words.” Semiotica 89:257–265.
Kirk, G. S., B. Hainsworth, M. W. Edwards, R. Janko, and N. Richardson. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S. M. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary I. Cambridge.
Kirkman, J. 2006. Punctuation Matters: Advice on Punctuation for Scientific and Technical Writing. 4th ed. London.
Kirsner, R. S., and V. J. van Heuven. 1999. “How Dutch Final Particles Constrain the Construal of Utterances: Experiment and Etymology.” In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik, and L. Noordman, 165–183. Amsterdam.
Klapproth, D. M. 2004. Narrative as Social Practice: Anglo-Western and Australian Aboriginal Oral Traditions. Berlin.
Klein, J. S. 1988. “Homeric Greek au: A Synchronic, Diachronic, and Comparative Study.” Historische Sprachforschung 101:249–288.
———. 1992. “Some Indo-European Systems of Conjunction: Rigveda, Old Persian, Homer.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94:1–51.
Kloss, G. 2001. Erscheinungsformen komischen Sprechens bei Aristophanes. Berlin.
Klotz, R. 1835. Matthaei Devarii liber de Graecae linguae particulis: Reinholdi Klotz adnotationes continens I. Leipzig.
———. 1842. Matthaei Devarii liber de Graecae linguae particulis: Reinholdi Klotz adnotationes continens II. Leipzig.
Knight, W. F. J. 1938. “Review of Denniston, The Greek Particles.” American Journal of Philology 59:490–494.
Kock, T. 1864. Aristophanes. Die Vögel. Berlin.
Kohl, W. 1977. Die Redetrias vor der sizilischen Expedition: (Thukydides 6, 9-23). Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie  91. Meisenheim am Glan.
Köhnken, A. 2006. Darstellungsziele und Erzählstrategien in antiken Texten. Berlin.
Kohonen, V., and N. E. Enkvist. 1978. Text Linguistics, Cognitive Learning and Language Teaching. Turku.
Koier, E. 2013. Interpreting Particles in Dead and Living Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach to the Semantics of Dutch ergens and Ancient Greek pou. Utrecht.
Koike, D. A. 1996. “Functions of the Adverbial ya in Spanish Narrative Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 25:267–279.
Koktová, E. 1986. Sentence Adverbials in a Functional Description. Amsterdam.
König, E. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles. London.
König, E., and J. van der Auwera. 1988. “Clause Integration in German and Dutch Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals, and Concessives.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson, 101–133. Amsterdam.
Konopka, A. E., and S. Brown-Schmidt. 2014. “Message Encoding.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language Production, ed. M. A. Goldrick, 3–20. Oxford.
Konstan, D. 2001. Pity Transformed. London.
———. 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto.
———. 2015. Beauty: The Fortunes of an Ancient Greek Idea. Onassis Series in Hellenic Culture. New York.
Korzen, I., and C. Marello, eds. 2000. Argomenti per una linguistica della traduzione. Alessandria.
Kovacs, D. 1994. Euripides. Cyclops, Alcestis, Medea. London.
———. 1995. Euripides. Children of Heracles, Hippolytus, Andromache, Hecuba. London.
———. 1998. Euripides. Suppliant Women, Electra, Heracles. London.
———. 2002. Euripides. Bacchae, Iphigeneia at Aulis, Rhesus. London.
Kratz, H. 1866. “Zur Lehre von der Partikel ἄρα und der Partikelverbindung καὶ γάρ.” Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 20:596–603.;view=1up;seq=614.
Kreij, M. de. 2013. “Dialogo Con Mark de Kreij: Apollonius Dyscolus’ Use of πρᾶγμα in His Definition of the Disjunctive Conjunctions.” In Ricerche a Confronto. Dialoghi Di Antichità Classiche E Del Vicino Oriente, Bologna-Trento 2011, ed. V. Gheller, 213–217. Montorso Vicentino.
———. 2014. “ἄρα, ἆρα, and ἦρα in Pindar’s Victory Odes.” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica N.s. 108:93–101.
———. 2016. “The Priming Act in Homeric Epic.” In Oral Poetics and Cognitive Science, ed. M. Antović and C. Pagán Cánovas, 148–167. Berlin.
Kress, G. R., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London.
Krifka, M. 1999. “Additive Particles under Stress.” In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 8, ed. D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson, 111–128.
Krischer, T. 1971. Formale Konventionen der homerischen Epik. Munich.
Kroon, C. H. M. 1989. “Causal connectors in Latin: the discourse function of nam, enim, igitur, ergo.” In Actes du Ve Colloque de Linguistique Latine, ed. M. Lavency and D. Longrée, 231–244. Louvain-La-Neuve.
———. 1992. “Particula perplexa. Over veelzijdige buitenbeentjes en gefrustreerde geleerden.” In Pentecostalia. Bundel ter gelegenheid van de vijftigste verjaardag van Harm Pinkster, ed. G. C. L. M. Bakkum, C. H. M. Kroon, and R. Risselada, 53–64. Amsterdam.
———. 1994a. “Discourse Connectives and Discourse Type: The Case of Latin at.” In Linguistic Studies on Latin: Selected Papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Budapest, 23-27 March 1991), ed. J. Herman, 303–317. Amsterdam.
———. 1994b. “Latijnse maar-equivalenten in narratief proza.” In Nauwe betrekkingen. Voor Theo Janssen bij zijn vijftigste verjaardag, ed. R. Boogaart and J. Noordegraaf, 129–136. Münster.
———. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam.
———. 1997. “Discourse Markers, Discourse Structure and Functional Grammar.” In Discourse and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, ed. J. H. Connolly, R. M. Vismans, C. S. Butler, and R. A. Gatward, 17–32. New York.
———. 1998. “A Framework for the Description of Latin Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 30:205–223.
———. 2004. “Latin quidem and the Structure of the Move.” In Words in Their Places: A Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie, ed. H. Aarts, M. Hannay, and R. Lyall, 199–209. Amsterdam.
———. 2005. “The Relationship between Grammar and Discourse: Evidence from the Latin Particle quidem.” In Latina Lingua!, ed. G. Calboli, 577–590. Rome.
———. 2007. “The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts.” In Discourse Modes and the Use of Tenses in Ovid’s “Metamorphoses, ed. R. J. Allan and M. Buijs, 65–92. Leiden.
———. 2009. “Latin Linguistics between Grammar and Discourse: Units of Analysis, Levels of Analysis.” In Pragmatische Kategorien: Form, Funktion und Diachronie; Akten der Marburger Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 24. bis 26. September 2007 in Marburg, ed. E. Rieken and P. Widmer, 143–158. Wiesbaden.
———. 2012. “Voce voco: Some Text Linguistic Observations on Ovid Heroides 10.” Mnemosyne 65:238–250.
Kroon, C. H. M., and R. Risselada. 1998. “The Discourse Functions of IAM.” In Estudios de Lingüística Latina, ed. B. García-Hernández, 429–445. Madrid.
———. 2002. “Phasality, Polarity, Focality: A Feature Analysis of the Latin Particle iam.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16:65–78.
Krüger, C. G. 1825. Xenophon Kyron Anabasis. Halle.
Krüger, G. T. A. 1834. De formulae ἀλλ᾽ ἤ et affinum part. natura et usu commentatio. Braunschweig.
Krüger, K. W. 1842. Griechische Sprachlehre für Schulen. Berlin.
———. 1860. “Wörterverzeichnis zu den Anmerkungen.” In Thucydides. Berlin.
———. 1871. Über die Dialekte, Vorzugsweise den Epischen und Ionischen. Bd. 2: Poetisch-dialektische Syntax. 3rd ed. Berlin.
Kugler, F. 1886. De particula τοι eiusque compositorum apud Platonem usu. Basel.
Kühner, R. 1869–1872. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Revised ed. 2 vols. Hannover.
Kuppens, P. 2009. “Anger.” In The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences, ed. D. Sander and K. R. Scherer, 32–33. Oxford.
Kvíčala, J. 1863. “Untersuchungen über griechische Partikeln, von W. Bäumlein, 1861 [Review].” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 14:304–325.
———. 1864a. “δέ.” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 15:313–334.
———. 1864b. “τε.” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 15:393–422.
Kühlewein, H. 1870. Observationes de usu particularum in libris qui vulgo Hippocratis nomine circumferuntur. Göttingen.
Kühner, R. 1835. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Bd. 2: Syntaxe. Hannover.
Kühner, R., and B. Gerth. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. 2 vols. 4th ed. Hannover.
Labéy, D. 1950. Manuel des particules grecques. Paris.
Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia.
Labov, W., and J. Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. J. Helm, 12–44. Seattle.
Lakoff, R. T. 1971. “If’s, And’s and But’s About Conjunction.” In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. C. J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen, 115–150. New York.
———. 1973. “Questionable Answers and Answerable Questions.” In Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, ed. Y. Malkiel, S. Saporta, A. Pietrangeli, R. B. Lees, and B. B. Kachru, 453–467. Urbana.
———. 1974. “Remarks on This and That.” Chicago Linguistic Society 10:345–356.
———. 2003. “Nine Ways of Looking at Apologies: The Necessity for Interdisciplinary Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. H. E. Hamilton, D. Tannen, and D. Schiffrin, 199–214. Oxford.
Lallot, J. 1997. Apollonius Dyscole. De la construction (syntaxe). Paris.
———. 1998. La Grammaire de Denys le Thrace. Paris.
———. 1999. “Philologie et grammaire à Alexandrie.” In Actes Du XXXIe congrès international de l’Association des Professeurs de Langues Anciennes de l’Enseignement Supérieur, ed. L. Basset and F. Biville, 41–49. Lyon.
Lallot, J., A. Rijksbaron, B. Jacquinod, and M. Buijs, ed. 2011. The Historical Present in Thucydides: Semantics and Narrative. Leiden.
Lam, P. W.Y. 2010. “Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of well.” Applied Linguistics 31:260–281.
Lamari, A. A. 2013. “Making Meaning: Cross-references and Their Interpretation in Thucydides’ Sicilian Narrative.” In Thucydides Between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis and M. Tamiolaki, 287–308. Berlin.
Lamb, W. R. M. 1914. Clio Enthroned: A Study in Prose-Form in Thucydides. Cambridge.
———. 1930. Lysias. London.
———. 1967. Plato. 7 vols. London.
Lambert, F. 2003. “Le ‘Balancement’ en men/de en grec classique.” In Ordre et distinction dans la langue et le discours: Actes du colloque international de Metz (18, 19, 20 Mars 1999), ed. B. Combettes, C. Schnedecker, A. Theissen, and J. Lengert, 270–285. Paris.
———. 2006. “Emplois et valeurs de toinun: Aux frontières de la syntaxe.” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on “Greek Syntax and Word Classes” Held in Madrid on 18-21, June 2003, ed. E. Crespo, J. de la Villa, and A. R. Revuelta, 537–556. Louvain-la-Neuve.
Lamberts, E. 1970. Studien zur Parataxe bei Herodot. Wien.
Lamers, H., and A. Rademaker. 2007. “Talking About Myself: A Pragmatic Approach to the Use of Aspect Forms in Lysias 12.4-19.” Classical Quarterly 57:458–476.
Lammert, R. 1874. De pronominibus relativis Homericis: Cap. III. De pronominibus relativis cum τε particula coniunctis. Leipzig.
Lan, B. le. 2007. “Orchestrating Conversation: The Multifunctionality of well and you know in the Joint Construction of a Verbal Interaction.” In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, ed. A. Celle and R. Huart, 103–116. Amsterdam.
Lancelot, C. 1664. Le jardin des racines grecques, mises en vers françois, avec un traité des prépositions et autres particules indéclinables, et un recueil alphabétique des mots françois tirés de la langue grecque, soit par allusion, soit par étymologie. Nouvelle édition, revue, corrigée exactement et augmentée. 2nd ed. Paris.
Lancker Sidtis, D. van. 2008. “The Relation of Human Language to Human Emotion.” In Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language, ed. B. Stemmer and H. A. Whitaker, 199–207. Amsterdam.
Landau, B., and R. Jackendoff. 1993. “What and Where in Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:217–238.
Landreth, M. C. 1978. “The Position of the Particles AN and KE(N) in Pindar.” Eranos 76:13–18.
Lang, E. 1977. Semantik der koordinativen Verknüpfung. Berlin.
Lang, M. L. 1984a. Herodotean Narrative and Discourse. Cambridge, MA.
———. 1984b. “Unreal Conditions in Homeric Narrative.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30:5–26.
———. 1995. “Participial Motivation in Thucydides.” Mnemosyne 48:48–65.
Lang, M. L., J. S. Rusten, and R. Hamilton. 2011. Thucydidean Narrative and Discourse. Ann Arbor, MI.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford.
———. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol. Cognitive Linguistics Research 1. Berlin.
———. 2001. “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 12:143–188.
———. 2005. “Integration, Grammaticization, and Constructional Meaning.” In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. M. Fried and H. C. Boas, 157–189. Amsterdam.
———. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford.
———. 2010. “Cognitive Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 87–109. Oxford.
Lange, L. 1873. “Der homerische Gebrauch der Partikel εἰ I-II.” Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der Koeniglich Saechsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 309–566.
Langslow, D. R. 2000. “Latin Discourse Particles, ‘Medical Latin’ and ‘Classical Latin.’” Mnemosyne 53:537–560.
Lardinois, A. P. M. H. 1996. “Who Sang Sappho’s Songs?” In Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches, ed. E. Greene, 150–172. Berkeley.
———. 2006. “The Polysemy of Gnomic Expressions and Ajax’ Deception Speech.” In Sophocles and the Greek Language, ed. I. J. F. de Jong and A. Rijksbaron, 213–223. Leiden.
Larsen, I. 1991a. “Boundary Features.” Notes on Translation 5:48–54.
———. 1991b. “Notes on the Function of γάρ, οὖν, μέν, δέ, καί and τε in the Greek New Testament.” Notes on Translation 5:35–47.
———. 1991c. “Quotations and Speech Introducers in Narrative Texts.” Notes on Translation 5:55–60.
———. 1991d. “Word Order and Relative Prominence in New Testament Greek.” Notes on Translation 5:29–34.
Latacz, J. 1977. Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der “Ilias”, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios. Zetemata 66. Munich.
Lateiner, D. 2012. “Oaths: Theory and Practice in the Histories of Herodotus and Thucydides.” In Thucydides and Herodotus, ed. E. Foster and D. Lateiner, 154–184. Oxford.
Lattimore, R. 1967. The Odyssey of Homer. London.
Lattmann, H. 1919. “Negation, Indefinitum, Intensivum und gr. μή.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 49:92–111.
Lauer, S. 1959. Zur Wortstellung bei Pindar. Winterthur.
Laury, R. 2005. “Dialogic Syntax and the Emergence of Topics in Interaction – an Initial Exploration.” Tranel (Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique) 41:165–189.
———, ed. 2008. Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining. Typological Studies in Language 80. Amsterdam.
Laury, R., and E.-L. Seppänen. 2008. “Clause Combining, Interaction, Evidentially, Participation Structure, and the Conjunction-Particle Continuum: The Finnish että.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. R. Laury, 153–178. Amsterdam.
Law, V., and I. Sluiter, eds. 1995. Dionysius Thrax and the Téchnē Grammatikḗ. The Henry Sweet Society Studies in the History of Linguistics 1. Münster.
Leaf, W. 1900. The Iliad: Books 1-12. 2nd ed. London.
———. 1902. The Iliad: Books 13-24. 2nd ed. London.
Lee, D. J. N. 1967. “The Modal Particles an, ke(n), ka.” American Journal of Philology 88:45–56.
Lee, D. Y. W. 2001. “Genres, Registers, Text Types, Domains, and Styles: Clarifying the Concepts and Navigating a Path through the BNC Jungle.” Language Learning and Technology 5:37–72.
Lee-Goldman, R. 2011. “No as a Discourse Marker.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:2627–2649.
Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London.
Leeuwen, J. van. 1896. Aristophanis Ranae. Leiden.
———. 1898. Aristophanis Nubes. Leiden.
———. 1900. Aristophanis Equites. Leiden.
———. 1901. Aristophanis Acharnenses. Leiden.
———. 1902. Aristophanis Aves. Leiden.
———. 1903. Aristophanis Lysistrata. Leiden.
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1988. “Who Sang Pindar’s Victory Odes?” American Journal of Philology 109:1–11.
———. 1991. First-Person Fictions: Pindar’s Poetic “I.” Oxford.
———. 1995. “The First Person in Pindar Reconsidered—Again.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40:139–150.
Lehiste, I., and P. Ivic. 1986. Word and Sentence Prosody in Serbocroatian. Cambridge, MA.
Lehmann, C. 1977. “A Universal about Conditional Sentences.” In Linguistica Generalia I. Studies in Linguistic Typology, ed. M. Romportl, 231–241. Prague.
———. 1988. “Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson, 181–225. Amsterdam.
Leino, J., and J.-O. Östman. 2005. “Constructions and Variability.” In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, ed. M. Fried and H. C. Boas, 191–213. Amsterdam.
Lenk, U. 1997. “Discourse Markers.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, and C. Bulcaen, 1–17. Amsterdam.
———. 1998. Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen.
Leumann, M. 1949. “Μέν und μήν, δέ und δή.” Museum Helveticum 6:85–89.
Levet, J. P. 1988. “Recherches sur le verbe ἨΜΙ.” Ediston logodeipnon, Logopédies. Mélanges de philologie et de linguistique grecques offerts à Jean Taillardat, 155–169.
Levin, S. 1979. “The Connective Particles in Classical Greek Discourse.” CUNY Forum Papers in Linguistics, V-VI: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of the Northeast Linguistics Society, 1.52–58. Flushing, NY.
Levinsohn, S. H. 1987. Textual Connections in Acts. Atlanta.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge.
———. 1987. “Minimization and Conversational Inference.” In The Pragmatic Perspective, ed. J. Verschueren and M. Bertucelli-Papi, 61–129. London.
———. 2006. “On the Human ‘Interactional Engine.’” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford.
———. 2013. “Action Formation and Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 103–130. Malden, MA.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1960. “L’analyse morphologique des contes russes.” International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 3:122–149.
Lewis, D. M. 2011. “A Discourse-Constructional Approach to the Emergence of Discourse Markers in English.” Linguistics 49:415–443.
Liberman, G. 2004. Pindarus. Pythiques. Paris.
Liberman, M., and J. Pierrehumbert. 1984. “Intonational Invariance under Changes in Pitch Range and Length.” In Language Sound Structure, ed. M. Aronoff, R. T. Oehrle, F. Kelley, and B. Wilker Stephens, 157–233. Cambridge, MA.
Liddell, H. G., R. Scott, and H. S. Jones. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed. Oxford.
Liddicoat, A. J. 2007. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London.
Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam.
———. 2007. “Dialogicality in Languages, Minds and Brains: Is There a Convergence between Dialogism and Neuro-Biology?” Language Sciences 29:605–620.
———. 2009. “Grammatical Constructions in Dialogue.” In Contexts and Constructions, ed. A. Bergs and G. Diewald, 97–110. Amsterdam.
Linke, K. 1977. Die Fragmente des Grammatikers Dionysios Thrax. Berlin.
Linke, R. 1873. De particulae δέ significatione affirmativa apud Sophoclem. Halle.
Liuzzo, P. M. 2012. “Παραπλήσιον ζωγράφων. Breve storia del confronto metodologico di storiografia e pittura.” Clamm Magazine.παραπλησιον-ζωγραφων-parte-i.
Ljungdahl, S. 1871. De transeundi generibus quibus utitur Isocrates. Uppsala.
Lloyd, A. B. 1989. Erodoto. Le storie. Libro II: L’Egitto. Milan.
Lloyd, M. 1994. Euripides. Andromache. Warminster.
———. 2004. “The Politeness of Achilles: Off-Record Conversation Strategies in Homer and the Meaning of ‘Kertomia.’” Journal of Hellenic Studies 124:75–89.
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1997 [1994]. Sophocles. Ajax, Electra, Oedipus Tyrannus. London.
———. 1998 [1994]. Sophocles. Antigone, The Women of Trachis, Philoctetes, Oedipus at Colonus. London.
Lloyd-Jones, H., and N. G. Wilson. 1990. Sophoclis Fabulae. Oxford.
Löbner, S. 1989. “German schon - erst - noch: An Integrated Analysis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12:167–212.
Lohmann, D. 1970. Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias. Berlin.
Longacre, R. E. 1974. “Narrative versus Other Discourse Genres.” In Advances in Tagmemics, ed. R. M. Brend, 357–376. Amsterdam.
———. 1985. “Discourse Peak as a Zone of Turbulence.” In Beyond the Sentence, ed. J. Wirth, 81–92. Ann Arbor, MI.
———. 1989. “Two Hypotheses Regarding Text Generation and Analysis.” Discourse Processes 12:413–460.
———. 1990. Storyline Concerns and Word Order Typology in East and West Africa. Los Angeles.
———. 1995. “Left Shifts in Strongly VSO Languages.” In Word Order in Discourse, ed. P. Downing and M. P. Noonan, 331–354. Amsterdam.
———. 1996. The Grammar of Discourse. 2nd ed. New York.
Lopes, R. 2008. “As partículas gregas: gar.” Boletim de Estudos Clássicos (Coímbra) 49:27–33.
López Eire, A. 1996. La Lengua Coloquial de La Comedia Aristofánica. Murcia.
Loraux, N. 1986. The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Cambridge, MA.
Lord, A. B. 1951. “Composition by Theme in Homer and Southslavic Epos.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 82:71–80.
———. 1960. “The Theme.” In The Singer of Tales, 68–98. Cambridge, MA.
———. 1981. “Memory, Fixity, and Genre in Oral Traditional Poetries.” In Oral Traditional Literature: A Festschrift for Albert Bates Lord, ed. J. M. Foley, 451–461. Columbus.
———. 2000. The Singer of Tales. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA.
Lorimer, W. L. 1934. “Magnum de particulis opus.” Classical Review 48:221–223.
———. 1935. “Review of Denniston’s Greek Particles.” Classical Review 49:12–14.
Louden, B. 1993. “Pivotal Contrafactuals in Homer.” Classical Antiquity 12:181–198.
Louviot, E. 2013. “Transitions from Direct Speech to Narration in Old English Poetry.” Neophilologus 97:383–393.
Louwerse, M. M., and H. H. Mitchell. 2003. “Towards a Taxonomy of a Set of Discourse Markers in Dialog: A Theoretical and Computational Linguistic Account.” Discourse Processes 35:199–239.
Lowe, J. C. B. 1973. “Γ᾽ἄρα, γ᾽ἆρα and τἄρα.” Glotta 51:34–64.
Lowth, R. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. With Critical Notes. London.
———. 1999. “Why German ‘schon’ and ‘noch’ Are Still Duals: A Reply to Van der Auwera.” Linguistics and Philosophy 22:45–107.
Lucci, J. 2012. “Sophocles the Comedian: Wordplay, Unequal Status, and Humor in Sophoclean Tragedy.” Presentation at CAMWS 108th Annual Meeting, Baton Rouge, LA, March 28–31.
Ludlow, P. 2011. The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics. Oxford.
Ludwig, T. 1882. De enuntiatorum interrogativorum apud Aristophanem usu. Königsberg.
Lühr, R. 2010. “Partikeln in indogermanischen Sprachen.” Linguistik Online 44:131–157.
Luke, K. K. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam.
Lundon, J. 2011. “Homeric Commentaries.” In Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, ed. S. Matthaios, F. Montanari, and A. Rengakos. Berlin.
Luraghi, S. 2007. “The Discourse Function of gar: Some Reflections.” Presentation at the 6th International Colloquium on Ancient Greek Linguistics, University of Groningen, June 27–29.
Luraghi, S., and G. Celano. 2012. “Connectives and Discourse Structure: Between Foreground and Background.” Presentation at the conference “Discourse Markers in Corpus Languages,” Vitoria-Gasteiz, November 28–30.
Luraghi, S., and E. Sausa. 2015. “Hate and Anger, Love and Desire: The Construal of Emotions in Homeric Greek.” In Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, Norway, 5-9 August 2013, ed. D. T. T. Haug, 233–256. Amsterdam.
Lutoslawski, W. 1897. “The Style of Plato.” In The Origin and Growth of Plato’s Logic, ed. W. Lutoslawski. London.
Lüttel, V. 1981. Kas und kai. Dialektale und chronologische Probleme im Zusammenhang mit Dissimilation und Apokope. Göttingen.
Lutzky, U. 2012. Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam.
Lutzky, U., and J. Demmen. 2013. “Pray in Early Modern English Drama.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14:263–284.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge.
———. 1982. “Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum?” In Speech, Place, and Action, ed. R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein, 101–124. Chichester.
Macan, R. W. 1908. Herodotus: The Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Books. 2 vols. London.
MacDowell, D. M. 1971. Aristophanes. Wasps. Oxford.
Mackay, E. A. 2001. “The Frontal Face and ‘You.’ Narrative Disjunction in Early Greek Poetry and Painting.” Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa 44:5–34.
Mackie, H. S. 2003. Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor, MI.
Magister, T. 1832. Ecloga vocum Atticarum. Ed. F. Ritschl. Halle.
Maidment, K. J. 1953. Minor Attic Orators in Two Volumes. Vol. 1: Antiphon; Andocides. London.
Malicki, C. 1907. De palin particula. Greifswald.
Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1987. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Framework for the Analysis of Texts.” Papers in Pragmatics 1:79–105.
Manutius, A. the Younger. 1566. Orthographiae Ratio. Venice.
Margerie, H. 2010. “On the Rise of (inter)subjective Meaning in the Grammaticalization of kind of/kinda.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, and H. Cuyckens, 315–346. Berlin.
Marincola, J. 1989. “Thucydides 1.22.2.” Classical Philology 84:216–223.
Marincola, J., and A. De Sélincourt. 2003. Herodotus. The Histories. London.
Markantonatos, G. A. 1986. Sophokleous Oidipous Tyrannos. Athens.
Markovic, D. 2006. “Hyperbaton in the Greek Literary Sentence.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 46:127–146.
Marmaridou, S. S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam.
Marold, C. 1881. Über die gotischen Konjunktionen, welche οὖν und γάρ vertreten. Königsberg.
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the “Iliad.” Ithaca.
———. 1997. “Similes and Performance.” In Written Voices, Spoken Signs, ed. A. Kahane and E. J. Bakker, 138–166. Cambridge, MA.
———. 2000. “Wrapping Homer Up: Cohesion, Discourse and Deviation in the Iliad.” In Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations, ed. A. Sharrock and H. Morales, 43–65. Oxford.
Martín López, M. I. 1993. “La función discursiva de la partícula griega de.” Habis 24:219–234.
Martínez Vázquez, R. 2011. “Oὕτως como adverbio conjuntivo e ordenación en la lengua de Tucídides.” Presented at the XL Simposio y III Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, Lingüística XL. “El lingüista ante el siglo XXI,” Madrid, February 7–10.
Martínez Vázquez, R., and E. Ruiz Yamuza. 2011. “Una pproximación escalar al empleo de adverbio como adjunto y conjunto: οὕτως.” Habis 42:315–336.
Martino, F. de, and O. Vox. 1996. Lirica Greca. Vol. 1. Bari. 
Maschler, Y. 1998. “Rotse lishmoa keta? ‘Wanna hear something weird/funny (lit. “a segment”)’? The Discourse Markers Segmenting Isreali Hebrew Talk-in-Interaction.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:13–59. Amsterdam.
———. 2003. “The Discourse Marker nu: Israeli Hebrew Impatience in Interaction.” Text 23:89–128.
———. 2009. Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers. Amsterdam.
Masini, F., and P. Pietrandrea. 2010. “Magari.” Cognitive Linguistics 21:75–121.
Masinyana, A.-M. S. O. 2013. “Ke in Utterances: Uses and Functions of the Xhosa Discourse Marker ke.” MA thesis, University of Cape Town.
Mastromarco, G., and P. Totaro. 2006. Commedie di Aristofane II. Turin.
Mastronarde, D. J. 1979. Contact and Discontinuity: Some Conventions of Speech and Action on the Greek Tragic Stage. Berkeley.
———. 2000. “Euripidean Tragedy and Genre: The Terminology and Its Problems.” In Euripides and Tragic Theatre in the Late Fifth Century, ed. M. J. Cropp, 23–39. Champaign, IL.
———. 2002. Euripides. Medea. Cambridge.
Matsumoto, Y. 2010. “Interactional Frames and Grammatical Descriptions: The Case of Japanese Noun-Modifying Constructions.” Constructions and Frames 2:135–157.
Matthaios, S. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre. Göttingen.
———. 2001. “Das Wortartensystem der Alexandriner: Skizze seiner Entwicklungsgeschichte und Nachwirkung.” Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 5:65–94.
———. 2002. “Neue Perspektiven für die Historiographie der antiken Grammatik: Das Wortartensystem der Alexandriner.” In Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity, ed. P. Swiggers and A. Wouters, 161–220. Leuven.
———. 2003. “Trypho aus Alexandria: Der erste Syntaxtheoretiker vor Apollonios Dyskolos?” In Syntax in Antiquity, ed. P. A. Swiggers and A. Wouters, 97–132. Leuven.
Matthaios, S., F. Montanari, and A. Rengakos, eds. 2011. Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts. Trends in Classics. Supplementary Volumes 8. Berlin.
Matthiae, A. 1825. Ausführliche griechische Grammatik. 2nd ed. Leipzig.
Matthiae, A., K. Matthiae, and B. Matthiae. 1841. Lexicon Euripideum. Leipzig.
Matthiae, K. 1845. Beitrag zur Lehre von den griechischen Partikeln ge, ara, men, de, an. Quedlinburg.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and S. A. Thompson. 1988. “The Structure of Discourse and ‘Subordination.’” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson, 275–329. Amsterdam.
Mazeland, H. 2012. “NOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleuters [NOU as a Discourse Marker in Talk-in-Interaction of Pre-School Children].” In Gesprekken in het onderwijs: Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Berenst, ed. K. de Glopper, M. Gosen, and J. Kruiningen, 39–71. Delft.
Mazeland, H., and M. Huiskes. 2001. “Dutch ‘but’ as a Sequential Conjunction: Its Use as a Resumption Marker.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 141–170. Amsterdam.
Mazeland, H., and L. Plug. 2010. “Doing Confirmation with ja/nee hoor: Sequential and Prosodic Characteristics of a Dutch Discourse Particle.” In Prosody in Interaction, ed. D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, and M. Selting, 161–187. Amsterdam.
McDermott, J. 1990. Punctuation for Now. London.
McDonald, M. 1992. Ancient Sun, Modern Light: Greek Drama on the Modern Stage. New York.
———. 2007. “Rhetoric and Tragedy: Weapons of Mass Persuasion.” In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, ed. I. Worthington, 473–489. Oxford.
McHoul, A. W. 1987. “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Fictional Conversation for Doing Conversation Analysis.” Semiotica 67:83–103.
Meineck, P. 2011. “The Neuroscience of the Tragic Mask.” Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 19:113–158.
———. 2013. “‘The Thorniest Problem and the Greatest Opportunity’: Directors on Directing the Greek Chorus.” In Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy, ed. M. Govers Hopman and R. Gagné, 352–383. Cambridge.
Meisterhans, K. 1900. Grammatik der attischen Inschriften. Berlin.
Menge, H. 1999 [1914]. Repetitorium des griechischen Syntax. Ed. A. Thierfelder and J. Wiesner. 10th ed. Darmstadt.
Menrad, J. 1913. “Homerica. (1) τε im Nachsatz? (2) δέ mit Ellipse des Verbums?” Bayerische Blätter für das Gymnasial-Schulwesen 49:232–235.
Mette, A. 1979. “ἀλλά.” In Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos I, ed. B. Snell and H. J. Mette, 505–535. Göttingen.
Metzger, F. 1880. Pindars Siegeslieder. Leipzig.
Meurman-Solin, A. 2012. “The connectives and, for, but, and only as Clause and Discourse Type Indicators in 16th- and 17th-Century Epistolary Prose.” In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, ed. A. Meurman-Solin, M. J. López-Couso, and B. Los, 164–196. Oxford Studies in the History of English 2. Oxford.
Mey, J. L. 1999. When Voices Clash: A Study in Literary Pragmatics. Berlin.
———. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Malden, MA.
Meyer, H. 1933. Hymnische Stilelemente in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. PhD diss., Cologne.
Meyer, L. 1866. “Über die anlautende Consonantenverbindung Ƒϱ (vr) in der homerischen Sprache.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 15:1–42.
Michaelis, L. A. 1996. “On the Use and Meaning of already.” Linguistics and Philosophy 19:477–502.
———. 2010. “Sign-Based Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 139–158. Oxford.
Miestamo, M. 2009. “Negation.” In Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, ed. F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 208–229. Amsterdam.
Miller, J., and R. Weinert. 1995. “The Function of like in Dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 23:365–393.
Minard, A. 1937. Deux relatifs homériques. Paris.
Minchin, E. 1992. “Scripts and Themes: Cognitive Research and the Homeric Epic.” Classical Antiquity 11:229–241.
———. 2001. Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford.
———. 2007. Homeric Voices: Discourse, Memory, Gender. Oxford.
———. 2008. “Spatial Memory and the Composition of the Iliad.” In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. E. A. Mackay, 9–34. Leiden.
Misener, G. 1904. The Meaning of γάρ. Baltimore.
———. 1908. “The εἰ γάρ Wishes.” Classical Philology 3:137–144.
———. 1937. “Review of Denniston, The Greek Particles.” Classical Philology 32:176–178.
———. 1955. “Review of Denniston, The Greek Particles, 2nd Edition.” Classical Philology 50:51.
Mišković-Luković, M. 2009. “Is there a chance that I might kinda sort of take you out to dinner? The Role of the Pragmatic Particles kind of and sort of in Utterance Interpretation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:602–625.
———. 2010. “Markers of Conceptual Adjustment: Serbian baš and kao.” In South Slavic Discourse Particles, ed. M. N. Dedaić and M. Mišković-Luković, 65–89. Amsterdam.
Mišković-Luković, M., and M. N. Dedaić. 2010. “South Slavic Discourse Particles: Introduction.” In South Slavic Discourse Particles, ed. M. N. Dedaić and M. Mišković-Luković, 1–22. Amsterdam.
———. 2012. “The Discourse Marker odnosno at the ICTY: A Case of Disputed Translation in War Crime Trials.” Journal of Pragmatics 44:1355–1377.
Mithun, M. 1988. “The Grammaticization of Coordination.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson, 333–359. Amsterdam.
Molinelli, P. 2008. “Tra oralità e scrittura: rogo nelle lettere private in Latino.” In Diachronica et synchronica: Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone Ramat, ed. R. Lazzeroni, E. Banfi, G. Bernini, M. Chini, and G. Marotta, 365–378. Pisa.
———. 2010. “From Verbs to Interactional Discourse Markers: The Pragmaticalization of Latin rogo, quaeso.” In Papers on Grammar XI, ed. G. Calboli and P. Cuzzolin, 181–192. Rome.
Molinos Tejada, M. T. 1992. “La Particule modale ka dans la litterature dorienne.” Revue Des Études Grecques 105.502–503:328–348.
Möllering, M. 2001. “Teaching German Modal Particles: A Corpus-Based Approach.” Language Learning & Technology 5:130–151.
Monro, D. B. 1882a. A Grammar of the Homeric Dialect. Oxford.
———. 1882b. “τε in Homer.” Transactions of the Oxford Philological Society 1882:14–15.
Montanari, F. 2005. Vocabolario della lingua greca. 2nd ed. Turin.
Monteil, P. 1963. La phrase relative en grec ancien: Sa formation, son développement, sa structure des origines à la fin du 5. siècle a. C. Paris.
Montes de Oca Vega, M. 2004. “In iqualtica yectica ygratia: los marcadores del discurso como estrategia para evangelizar.” In De historiografía lingüística e historia de las lenguas, ed. I. Guzmán Betancourt, P. Maníes, and A. H. de León-Portilla, 107–123. Mexico City.
Moore, C. 2006. “The Use of videlicet in Early Modern Slander Depositions: A Case of Genre-Specific Grammaticalization.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7:245–263.
Moorhouse, A. C. 1952. “Observations on Epic ἀλλά.” Classical Quarterly 2:100–104.
———. 1959. Studies in the Greek Negatives. Cardiff.
———. 1982. The Syntax of Sophocles. Leiden.
Morpurgo Davies, A. 1997. “Particles in Greek Epigraphical Texts: The Case of Arcadian.” In Rijksbaron 1997:49–73. Amsterdam.
Morpurgo Tagliabue, G. 1980. Demetrio: Dello stile. Rome.
Morrison, J. V. 1994. “A Key Topos in Thucydides: The Comparison of Cities and Individuals.” American Journal of Philology 155:525–541.
———. 2006a. “Interaction of Speech and Narrative in Thucydides.” In Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, ed. A. Rengakos and A. Tsakmakis, 251–277. Leiden.
———. 2006b. Reading Thucydides. Columbus.
Mortillaro, M., M. Mehu, and K. R. Scherer. 2013. “The Evolutionary Origin of Multimodal Synchronization and Emotional Expression.” In The Evolution of Emotional Communication: From Sounds in Nonhuman Mammals to Speech and Music in Man, ed. E. Altenmüller, S. Schmidt, and E. Zimmermann, 3–25. Oxford.
Mosblech, P. W. 1838. “Einiges über die Partikel τε.” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft 5:948–950.
Mossman, J. 2011. Euripides. Medea. Oxford.
Most, G. W. 1993. “Hesiod and the Textualization of Personal Temporality.” In La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realtà e artificio letterario, ed. G. Arrighetti and F. Montanari, 73–92. Pisa.
Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. Göttingen.
Muchnová, D. 1993. “Les propositions causales en epei.” Graecolatina Pragensia 14:89–96.
———. 2000. “Epei en tant que particule dans les phrases autonomes.” Graecolatina Pragensia 18:119–136.
———. 2003. “Epei homérique: sémantique, syntaxe, pragmatique.” Gaia 7:105–116.
———. 2004. “Les emplois paratactiques de hos.” Graecolatina Pragensia 20:121–131.
———. 2006. “Entre conjonction et particule: Le cas de epei.” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on “Greek Syntax and Word Classes” Held in Madrid on 18-21, June 2003, ed. E. Crespo, J. de la Villa, and A. R. Revuelta Puigdollers, 557–570. Louvain-la-Neuve.
———. 2007. “À propos des interprétations pragmatiques de ὅτι causal chez Homère.” Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica – Graecolatina Pragensia 22:85–102.
———. 2009. “Epei Clauses in Narrative Discourse in Ancient Greek.” In Early European Languages in the Eyes of Modern Linguistics, ed. K. Loudová and M. Žáková, 229–240. Brno.
———. 2011. Entre conjonction, connecteur et particule: Le cas de ἐπεί en grec ancien; Étude syntaxique, sémantique et pragmatique. Prague.
Mueller, F. 1910. Quaestiones grammaticae de γάρ particulisque adversativis enuntiata eorumque membra coniungentibus. Göttingen.
Mueller, M. 2011. “The Politics of Gesture in Sophocles’ Antigone.” Classical Quarterly 61:412–425.
———. 2015. Objects as Actors: Props and the Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy. Chicago.
Muellner, L. C. 1990. “The Simile of the Cranes and Pygmies: A Study of Homeric Metaphor.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 93:59–101.
———. 1996. The Anger of Achilles: Mēnis in Greek Epic. Cornell.
Mühll, P. von der. 1946. Homer. Odyssey. Basel.
Müller, D. 1980. Satzbau, Satzgliederung und Satzverbindung in der Prosa Herodots. Meisenheim am Glan.
Müller, F. 1927. Stilistische Untersuchung der Epinomis des Philippos von Opus. Gräfenhainichen.
Müller, W. 1874. De Theophrasti dicendi ratione. Pars prima. Observationes de particularum usu. Göttingen.
Mulligan, B. 2007. “ἄρα Introducing Direct Speech in Herodotus.” Mnemosyne 60:281–284.
Munson, R. V. 2001. “Ananke in Herodotus.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 121:30–50.
———. 2013. Herodotus. 2 vols. Oxford.
Munteanu, D. L. 2011. “Comic Emotions: Shamelessness and Envy (Schadenfreude); Moderate Emotion.” In Emotion, Genre and Gender in Classical Antiquity, ed. D. L. Munteanu, 89–112. London.
———. 2012. Tragic Pathos: Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy. Cambridge.
Murphy, C. T. 1938. “Aristophanes and the Art of Rhetoric.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 49:69–113.
Murray, A. T., and G. E. Dimock. 1995. Homer. Odyssey. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA.
Murray, A. T., and W. F. Wyatt. 1999. Homer. Iliad. 2nd ed., 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Murray, G. 1955 [1937]. Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoediae. Oxford.
Musurillo, H. 1970. “Particles in the Prometheus Bound.” Classical Philology 65:175–177.
Mutzbauer, C. 1884–1886. Der Homerische Gebrauch der Partikel μέν. 2 vols. Cologne.
Mycock, L. 2010. “Prominence in Hungarian: The Prosody–syntax Connection.” Transactions of the Philological Society 108:265–297.
Myhill, J., and J. Hibiya. 1988. “The Discourse Function of Clause-Chaining.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson, 361–398. Amsterdam.
Naber, S. A. 1855. “Homerica.” Mnemosyne 4:193–217.
Nachmansson, E. 1920. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der altgriechischen Volkssprache. Uppsala.
Naeke, A. F. 1842. De ἠδέ et ἰδέ particulis apud Homerum. Bonn.
Nägelsbach, C. F. 1830. Commentatio de particula γε usu Homerico. Nürnberg.
———. 1834. Anmerkungen zur Ilias. Nürnberg.
Nagler, M. N. 1974. Spontaneity and Tradition: A Study in the Oral Art of Homer. Berkeley.
Nagy, G. N. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Ancient Greek Poetry. Baltimore.
———. 1990. Pindar’s Homer. The Lyric Possession of the Epic Past. Baltimore.
———. 1995. “Transformations of Choral Lyric Traditions in the Context of Athenian State Theater.” Arion 3:41–55.
———. 1996. Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge.
———. 1999. “Epic as Genre.” In Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World: The Poetics of Community, ed. M. Beissinger, J. Tylus, and S. Wofford, 21–32. Berkeley.
———. 2006. The Epic Hero. 2nd online ed. Washington, DC.
———. 2009. “Performance and Text in Ancient Greece.” In Performances and Texts: Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies, ed. G. Boys-Stones, B. Graziosi, and P. Vasunia, 417–431. Oxford.
Naiden, F. S. 2012. “Blessèd Are the Parasites.” In Greek and Roman Animal Sacrifice: Ancient Victims, Modern Observers, ed. C. A. Faraone and F. S. Naiden, 55–83. Cambridge.
———. 2013. Smoke Signals for the Gods: Ancient Greek Sacrifice from the Archaic Through Roman Periods. Oxford.
Nauck, A. 1879. “Kritische Bemerkungen.” Bulletin de l'académie impériale des sciences de St.-Petersbourg 25:409–479.
Navarre, O. 1900. Essai sur la rhétorique grecque avant Aristote. Paris.
———. 1904a. “Études sur les particules greques: δῆθεν.” Revue des études anciennes 6:320–328.
———. 1904b. “Études sur les particules greques: ἤδη.” Revue des études anciennes 6:77–98.
———. 1905. “Études sur les particules greques: τοίνυν.” Revue des études anciennes 7:125–30.
———. 1908. “Études sur les particules greques: οὖν.” Revue des études anciennes 10:293–335.
———. 1932. “La particule greque ΔΗ.” Melanges Glotz 2:667–679.
Neil, R. A. 1901. “The Particle γε (Appendix I).” In The Knights of Aristophanes, 185–201. Cambridge.
Neitzel, H. 1975. Homer-Rezeption bei Hesiod. Bonn.
Nenci, G., ed. 1998. Erodoto. Le storie. Libro VI: La battaglia di Maratona. Milan.
Nesselrath, H.-G. 1992. Ungeschehenes Geschehen: "Beinahe-Episoden" im griechischen und römischen Epos von Homer bis zur Spätantike. Stuttgart.
Nicolai, R. 2001. “Thucydides’ Archaeology: Between Epic and Oral Traditions.” In The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, ed. N. Luraghi, 263–285. Oxford.
Nikiforidou, K. 2009. “Constructional Analysis.” In Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, ed. F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren, 16–32. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “Viewpoint and Construction Grammar: The Case of Past + Now.” Language and Literature 19:265–284.
Nimis, S. A. 1987. Narrative Semiotics in the Epic Tradition: The Simile. Bloomington.
Noh, E.-J. 2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance-Theory Approach. Amsterdam.
Nølke, H. 2013. “La Polyphonie Linguistique.” Lalies 33:7–76.
Nordgren, L. 2012. The Greek Interjections: Studies on the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of the Interjections in Fifth-Century Drama. PhD diss., Stockholm University.
———. 2015. Greek Interjections: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics. Berlin.
Norlin, G. 1980–1986. Isocrates. 3 vols. Cambride, MA.
Norrick, N. R. 2000. Conversational Narrative. Amsterdam.
———. 2001. “Discourse Markers in Oral Narrative.” Journal of Pragmatics 33:849–878.
———. 2009a. “Interjections as Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:866–91.
———. 2009b. “Pragmatic Markers: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:863–865.
Nugent, T. 1773. “The Third Part of the Greek Primitives, Which Treats of the Undeclinable Particles.” In The Primitives of the Greek Tongue. Containing a Complete Collection of All the Roots or Primitives Words, Together with the Most Considerable Derivatives of the Greek Language. 312–30. London.
Nünlist, R., and I. J. F. de Jong, eds. 2007. Time in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden.
Nuolijärvi, P., and L. Tiittula. 2011. “Irony in Political Television Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:572–87.
Ochs, E. 1996. “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge.
Ochs, E., E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson, eds. 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge.
Ochs Keenan, E., and B. Schieffelin. 1976. “Foregrounding Referents: A Reconsideration of Left-Dislocation in Discourse.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 2:240–257.
Oeltze, O. 1887. De Particularum μέν et δέ apud Thucydidem Usu. Halle am Saale.
Oguse, A. 1968. “Sur Les Concessives à Principale Négative.” Revue de Philologie, de Littérature et de Histoire Anciennes 42:262–284.
Öhman, A. 2009. “Fear.” In The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences, ed. D. Sander and K.R. Scherer, 182–183. Oxford.
Olson, S. D. 1998. Aristophanes. Peace. Oxford.
———. 2002. Aristophanes. Acharnians. Oxford.
Olsson, C.-J., and L. Nyberg. 2011. “Brain Simulation of Action May Be Grounded in Physical Experience.” Neurocase 17:501–505.
O’Neill, E. 1938. Aristophanes. Women at the Thesmophoria. New York.
Ong, W. J. 1944. “Historical Backgrounds of Elizabethan and Jacobean Punctuation Theory.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 59:349–360.
———. 1984. “Orality, Literacy, and Medieval Textualization.” New Literary History 16:1–12.
Onodera, N. O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam.
———. 2011. “The Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. H. Narrog and B. Heine, 614–624. Oxford.
Ophuijsen, J. M. van. 1993. “Oun, Ara, Dh, Toinun: The Linguistic Articulation of Arguments in Plato’s Phaedo.” In Van Ophuijsen and Sicking 1993:67–164.
Ophuijsen, J. M. van, and C. M. J. Sicking. 1993. Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage: Lysias and Plato. Leiden.
Ophuijsen, J. M. van, and P. Stork. 1999. Linguistics into Interpretation: Speeches of War in Herodotus VII 5 & 8-18. Leiden.
Oranje, H. 1984. Euripides’ Bacchae: The Play and Its Audience. Leiden.
Oreal, E. 1997. “Sur la fonction argumentative de quelques particules Grecques.” Lalies 17:229–249.
Orlandini, A. 1994. “‘Si non eo die, at postridie’: une analyse pragmatique du connecteur Latin at.” Lalies 14:159–175.
———. 1995. “De la connexion: une analyse pragmatique des connecteurs Latins atqui et immo.” Lalies 15:259–269.
———. 1999. “de la connexion: une analyse pragmatique des connecteurs Latins autem et ceterum.” Indogermanische Forschungen 104:142–163.
Orlandini, A., and P. Poccetti. 2007. “Les opérateurs de coordination et les connecteurs en Latin et dans d’autres langues de la Méditerranée ancienne.” In La Coordination. Rivages Linguistiques, ed. A. Rousseau, L. Begioni, and N. Quayle, 189–224. Rennes.
———. 2009. “Corrélation, coordination et comparaison en Latin et dans les langues Italiques.” Langages 174:53–66.
Oropeza-Escobar, M. 2011. Represented Discourse, Resonance and Stance in Joking Interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam.
Ortolá Guixot, A. F. 2001. “The Use of the Modal Particle an in Thucydides’ Speeches.” Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Lingüístics 6:175–196.
Osborne, R. 1993. “Women and Sacrifice in Classical Greece.” The Classical Quarterly 43:392–405.
Östman, J.-O. 1991. “On the Language-Internal Interaction of Prosody and Pragmatic Particles.” In Levels of Linguistic Adaptation, ed. J. Verschueren, 203–221. Amsterdam.
———. 1995. “Pragmatic Particles Twenty Years after.” In Organization in Discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference, ed. B. Wårvik, S.-K. Tanskanen, and R. Hiltunen, 14:95–108. Turku.
———. 1999. “Coherence through Understanding through Discourse Patterns: Focus on News Reports.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse, ed. W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, and E. Ventola, 77–100. Amsterdam.
———. 2005. “Construction Discourse: A Prolegomenon.” In Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, ed. J.-O. Östman and M. Fried, 121–144. Amsterdam.
Östman, J.-O., and M. Fried. 2004. “Historical and Intellectual Background of Construction Grammar.” In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. M. Fried and J.-O. Östman, 1–10. Amsterdam.
Östman, J.-O., and G. Trousdale. 2013. “Dialects, Discourse, and Construction Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale. Oxford.
Östman, J.-O., and T. Virtanen. 1999. “Theme, Comment, and Newness as Figures in Information Structure.” In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, ed. K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik, and L. Noordman, 91–110. Amsterdam.
Ostrowiecki, H. 1994. “Limites du dialogue. Breve étude de la particule oun dans le Menon.” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 68:171–185.
Ostwald, M. 2009. Language and History in Ancient Greek Culture. Philadelphia.
Otterlo, W. A. A. van. 1944. Untersuchungen über Begriff, Anwendung und Entstehung der griechischen Ringkomposition. Amsterdam.
Ottsen, P. G. 1847. De rerum inventione ac dispositione, quae est in Lysiae atque Antiphontis orationibus. Flensburg.
Owren, M. J., M. Philipp, E. Vanman, N. Trivedi, A. Schulman, and J.-A. Bachorowski. 2013. “Understanding Spontaneous Human Laughter: The Role of Voicing in Inducing Positive Emotion.” In The Evolution of Emotional Communication: From Sounds in Nonhuman Mammals to Speech and Music in Man, ed. E. Altenmüller, S. Schmidt, and E. Zimmermann, 175–190. Oxford.
Pace, G. 2002. “Il Termine Periodos Nella Dottrina Metrica E Ritmica Antica.” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 71:25–46.
Pagani, L. 2011. “Pioneers of Grammar: Hellenistic Scholarship and the Study of Language.” In From Scholars to Scholia: Chapters in the History of Ancient Greek Scholarship, ed. F. Montanari and L. Pagani, 17–64. Berlin.
Page, D. L. 1938. Euripides. Medea. Oxford.
———. 1972. Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoedias. Oxford.
Paley, F. A. 1881. A Short Treatise on the Greek Particles and Their Combinations According to Attic Usage. Cambridge.
Palmer, L. R. 1980. The Greek language. London.
Pander Maat, H. L. W. 2001. “Unstressed en/and as a Marker of Joint Relevance.” In Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. T. Sanders and W. Spooren, 197–230. Amsterdam.
Páez Martínez, M. 2012. “Bibliography about Greek Particles (1935-2010).” Syntaktika 42:3–43.
Parkes, M. B. 1992. Pause and Effect. An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Aldershot.
Parry, M. 1936. “On Typical Scenes in Homer.” Classical Philology 31:404–407.
———. 1971. The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Ed. A. Parry. Oxford.
Partee, B. H., and H. L. W. Hendriks. 1997. “Montague Grammar.” In Handbook of Logic and Language, ed. J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, 5–91. Amsterdam.
Partridge, E. 1953. You Have a Point There: A Guide to Punctuation and Its Allies. London.
Pascal, R. 1977. The Dual Voice: Free Indirect Speech and Its Functioning in the Nineteenth-Century European Novel. Manchester.
Passot, F. 2007. “A Because B so A’: Circularity and Discourse Progression in Conversational English.” In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, ed. A. Celle and R. Huart, 117–134. Amsterdam.
Passow, F. 1841–1857. Handwörterbuch der griechischen Sprache. 5th ed. Leipzig.
Patt, S. 2013. Punctuation as a Means of Medium-Dependent Presentation Structure in English: Exploring the Guide Functions of Punctuation. Tübingen.
Patten, G. 2009. Pindar’s Metaphors : A Study in Rhetoric and Meaning. Heidelberg.
Pavlou, M. 2013. “Attributive Discourse in the Speeches in Thucydides.” In Thucydides Between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis and M. Tamiolaki, 409–434. Berlin.
Pawley, A., and F. Hodgetts Syder. 2000. “The One-Clause-at-a-Time Hypothesis.” In Perspectives on Fluency, ed. H. Riggenbach, 163–199. Ann Arbor, MI.
Pearson, A. C. 1917. “Index to the Tragedies and Fragments [of Sophocles].” In The Fragments of Sophocles III, ed. A. C. Pearson. Cambridge.
Pearson, A. C., ed. 1903. The Helena of Euripides. Cambridge.
Pecorella, G. B. 1962. ΤΕΧΝΗ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΚΗ. Testo critico e commento. Bologna.
Pedley, J. Griffiths, ed. 1972. Ancient literary sources on Sardis. Cambridge, MA.
Peile, T. W. 1839. “Note on τε.” In Agamemnon, ed. T. W. Peile, 378–394.
Pekarek Doehler, S. 2011a. “Clause-Combining and the Sequencing of Actions: Projector Constructions in French Talk-in-Interaction.” In Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. R. Laury and R. Suzuki, 103–148. Amsterdam.
———. 2011b. “Emergent Grammar for All Practical Purposes: The on-Line Formating of Dislocated Constructions in French Conversation.” In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. S. Pfänder and P. Auer, 46–88. Berlin.
Pelliccia, H. 1987. “Pindarus Homericus: Pythian 3.1-80.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91:39–63.
———. 1989. “Pindar, Nemean 7.31-36 and the Syntax of Aetiology.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 92:71–101.
———. 1998. “The Transposition of Aeschylus, Agamemnon 1203-1204 and the Uses of môn.” In Mir Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, ed. J. H. Jasanoff, 561–572. Innsbruck.
Pelling, C. 1991. “Thucydides’ Archidamus and Herodotus' Artabanus.” In Georgica: Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell, ed. M. Flower and M. Toher, 120-142. London.
———. 2005. “Tragedy, Rhetoric, and Performance Culture.” In A Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. J. Gregory, 83–102. Oxford.
———. 2006. “Speech and Narrative in the Histories.” In The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, ed. C. Dewald and J. Marincola, 103–121. Cambridge.
———. 2009. “Thucydides’ Speeches.” In Thucydides: Oxford Readings in Classical Texts, ed. J. S. Rusten, 176–187. Oxford.
Pennebaker, J. W. 2011. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say about Us. New York.
Perdicoyianni-Paléologue, H. 2002. “The Interjections in Greek Tragedy.” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 70:49–88.
Pernée, L. 1987. “Deux Exemples Pour Illustrer La Nécessité d’une Traduction élaborée en Grec Ancien.” Les Études Classiques 55:121–135.
Perpillou, J. L. 1978. “Débuts de phrase en Grec méridional archaique.” In Etrennes de septantaine. Travaux de linguistique et de grammaire comparée offerts à Michel Lejeune, 179–181. Paris.
Perria, L. 1991. “L’interpunzione nei manoscritti della ‘collezione filosofica’.” In Paleografia e codicologia greca. Atti del II colloquio internazionale, eds. D. Harlfinger and G. Prato, 199–209. Alessandria.
Person, R. F. 2009. “‘Oh’ in Shakespeare: A Conversation Analytic Approach.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10:84–107.
Persson, P. 1886. Studia Etymologica. Uppsala.
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship. Oxford.
Pfeiffer-Petersen, S. 1996. Konfliktstichomythien bei Sophokles: Funktion und Gestaltung. Wiesbaden.
Pfeijffer, I. L. 1999. Three Aeginetan Odes of Pindar: A Commentary on Nemean V, Nemean III, and Pythian VIII. Leiden.
Pfudel, E. 1871. Beiträge zur Syntax der Causalsätze bei Homer. Liegnitz.
Philippi, J. 2008. Einführung in die generative Grammatik. Göttingen.
Pickering, M. J., and S. Garrod. 2006. “Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication.” Research on Language and Computation 4:203–228.
Pickering, P. E. 1999. Verbal Repetition in Greek Tragedy. London.
———. 2000a. “Repetitions and Their Removal by the Copyists of Greek Tragedy.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 41:123–139.
———. 2000b. “Verbal Repetition in Prometheus and Greek Tragedy Generally.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 44:81–101.
———. 2003. “Did the Greek Ear Detect ‘careless’ Verbal Repetitions?” The Classical Quarterly 53:490–499.
Pickering, P. E., and M. J. Pickering. 2002. “Do Real People Talk Like Electra and Orestes?—Repetition in Dialogue: Tragedy Compared with Natural Speech.” Presentation at the Joint Classical Association and Classical Association of Scotland Annual Conference, Edinburgh, April 4–7.
Piderit, K. W. 1854. “[Review of Classen 1854].” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 70:69–78.
Pinborg, J. 1975. “Classical Antiquity: Greece.” In Current Trends in Linguistics. Vol. 13: Historiography of Linguistics, ed. T.A. Sebeok, 1:69–126. The Hague.
Pinkster, H. 1972. On Latin Adverbs. Amsterdam.
———. 2010. “The Use of Quia and Quoniam in Cicero, Seneca, and Tertullian.” In Studies in Classical Linguistics in Honor of Philip Baldi, ed. B. R. Page and A. D. Rubin, 81–96. Leiden.
Platnauer, M. 1964. Aristophanes: Peace. Oxford.
Platt, A. 1911. “Plato, Republic, 614 B.” The Classical Review 25:13–14.
Pokorny, J. 1959. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern.
Polanyi, L. 1988. “A Formal Model of the Structure of Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 12:601–638.
Polanyi, L., and R. J. H. Scha. 1983. “The Syntax of Discourse.” Text 3:261–270.
Polo Arrondo, J. F. 2007. “De la subordinación al discurso: Un ejemplo en Griego antiguo.” Interlingüística 17:827–836.
———. 2011. “A New Approach to Subordination in Ancient Greek: The Case of πλήν.” Presentation at the Linguistics and Classical Languages Conference, Rome, Febrary 17–19.
Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge.
Pons Bordería, S. 2014. Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages. Amsterdam.
Pons Bordería, S., and M. Estellés Arguedas. 2009. “Expressing Digression Linguistically: Do Digressive Markers Exist?” Journal of Pragmatics 41:921–936.
Pontani, F. M. 1951. Eschilo. I Persiani. Rome.
Poppo, E. F., and J. M. Stahl. 1875–1889. Thucydidis de bello Peloponnesiaco Libri Octo. 3rd ed. Leipzig.
Posner, R. 1980. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language.” In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch, 169–203. Dordrecht.
Pott, A. F. 1836. Etymologische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der indo-germanischen Sprachen. Halle.
Powell, J. E. 1933. “Studies on the Greek Reflexive-Herodotus.” The Classical Quarterly 27:208–221.
———. 1934. “Studies on the Greek Reflexive—Thucydides.” Classical Quarterly 28:159–174.
———. 1938. A Lexicon to Herodotus. Cambridge.
Powers, M. 2014. Athenian Tragedy in Performance: A Guide to Contemporary Studies and Historical Debates. Iowa City.
Praetorius, F. 1873. Der homerische Gebrauch von ē (ēe) in Fragesätzen. Kassel.
Preacher, K.J. 2001. Calculation for the Chi-Square Test: An Interactive Calculation Tool for Chi-Square Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence [computer Software].
Preuss, S. 1892. Index Demosthenicus. Leipzig.
———. 1896. Index Aeschineus. Leipzig.
———. 1904. Index Isocrateus. Leipzig.
Prince, E. F. 1981. “Towards a Taxonomy of given and New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. P. Cole, 223–256. New York.
Prince, G. 1997. “Narratology and Narratological Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7:39–44.
Privitera, G. A. 1982. Pindaro. Le Istmiche. Milan.
Probert, Ph. 2006. Ancient Greek Accentuation: Synchronic Patterns, Frequency Effects, and Prehistory. Oxford.
———. 2015. Early Greek Relative Clauses. Oxford.
Propp, V. Ja., and L. Scott, trans. 1958. Morphology of the Folktale. Bloomington.
Provenza, A. 2013. “Madness and Bestialization in Euripides’ Heracles.” The Classical Quarterly n.s. 63:68–93.
Pucci, P. 2007. “Euripides and Aristophanes: What Does Tragedy Teach?” In Visualizing the Tragic: Drama, Myth, and Ritual in Greek Art and Literature, ed. C. Kraus, S. Goldhill, H. P. Foley, and J. Elsner, 105–126. Oxford.
Purves, A. C. 2010. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge.
Quaglio, P. 2009. Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London.
Race, W. H. 1989. “Elements of Style in Pindaric Break-Offs.” American Journal of Philology 110:189–209.
———. 1997. Pindar. Victory Odes and Fragments. Cambridge, MA.
———. 2000. “Explanatory de-Clauses in the Iliad.” The Classical Journal 95:205–227.
———. 2002. “Framing Hyperbata in Pindar’s Odes.” The Classical Journal 98:21–33.
Räder, H. 1953. Ein Problem in griechischer Syntax. Die Verbindung der Partikel an mit Futurum. Copenhagen.
Radermacher, L. 1902. “Drei Deutungen. III δέ?” Rheinisches Museum 57:480.
———. 1908. “ὡς, ὁμοίως und Verwandtes.” Rheinisches Museum 63:312–313.
———. 1928. “Bemerkungen zur Sprache des Sophokles.” Wiener Studien 46:130–132.
Raeburn, D., and O. R. H. Thomas. 2011. The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. Oxford.
Raible, W. 1992. Junktion. Eine Dimension der Sprache und ihre Realisierungsformen zwischen Aggregation und Integration. Heidelberg.
———. 2001. “Linking Clauses.” In Language Typology and Language Universals, ed. M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher, and W. Raible, 590–617. Berlin.
Ramsay, W. M. 1898. “καί meaning ‘or.’” The Classical Review 12:337–341.
Rassow, J. 1889. “De collocatione particularum τε, καί, οὔτε, οὐδέ in fabulis Euripideis: Analecta Euripidea, Pars II.” In Jahresbericht über das städtische Gymnasium und das mit Demselben verbundene Realprogymnasium zu Greifswald. Greifswald.
Raymond, G. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone ‘so’ in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37:185–218.
Ready, J. L. 2011. Character, Narrator, and Simile in the Iliad. Cambridge.
Redeker, G. 1990. “Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14:367–381.
———. 1991. “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure: Review of Discourse Markers by D. Schiffrin.” Linguistics 29:1139–1172.
———. 2006. “Discourse Markers as Attentional Cues at Discourse Transitions.” In Fischer 2006:339–358.
Redondo, J. 1989. “De nuevo sobre la cuestión de las partículas Griegas.” Actas del VII congreso Español de estudios clásicos I, Madrid, 261–266. Madrid.
Redondo Moyano, E. 1993. “El repertorio de las partículas en Griego antiguo.” Veleia 10:221–226.
———. 1995. Estudio sintáctico de las partículas en el período Helenístico. Amsterdam.
Rehdantz, C. 1866. Index to Demosthenes, Philippics. Leipzig.
Reinhold, H. 1894. “Index.” In Hyperidis orationes sex, cum ceterarum fragmentis, ed. F. Blass. Leipzig.
Reisenzein, R. 1994. “Pleasure-Arousal Theory and the Intensity of Emotions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67:525–539.
Reisig, K. C. 1823. Commentarii in Sophoclis Oedipum Coloneum. Jena.
Renoir, A. 1962. “Point of View and Design for Terror in Beowulf.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 63:154–167.
Repgen, K. 1982. “Über Rankes Diktum von 1824.” Historisches Jahrbuch 102:439–449.
Revelle, W., and K. R. Scherer. 2009. “Personality (and Emotion).” In The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences, ed. D. Sander and K. R. Scherer, 304–305. Oxford.
Revermann, M. 2006a. Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy. Oxford.
———. 2006b. “The Competence of Theatre Audiences in Fifth- and Fourth-Century Athens.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 126:99–124.
Revuelta Puigdollers, A. R. 1996. Estudio de las partículas Griegas αὖ, αὖτε, αὖθις, ἄψ, πάλιν y ὀπίσω en Griego antiguo. Madrid.
———. 1998. “Focusing Particles in Latin. Some Remarks.” In Estudios de lingüística Latina: actas del IX coloquio internacional de lingüística Latina II, ed. B. García-Hernández, 689–704. Madrid.
———. 2000. “Parallel focus particles, especially in Ancient Greek.” In Cien años de investigación semántica: de Michel Bréal a la actualidad: actas del congreso internacional de semántica; Universidad de La Laguna 27–31 de octubre de 1997, ed. M. Martínez Hernández, 1175–1190. Madrid.
———. 2006a. “Los Adverbios en Griego Antiguo. Las Partículas.” In Sintaxis Griega, ed. D. Jiménez López. Liceus E-Excellence. El Portal de las Humanidades.
———. 2006b. “Word Classes, Functions and Syntactic Level: The Case of Palin.” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek: Proceedings of the Conference on “Greek Syntax and Word Classes” held in Madrid on 18-21, June 2003, ed. E. Crespo, J. de la Villa, and A. R. Revuelta Puigdollers, 455–470. Louvain-la-Neuve.
———. 2009a. “Particles and Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, August 30th–September 2nd, 2007, ed. G. K. Giannakis, M. Baltazani, G. I. Xidopoulos, and T. Tsagalidis, 394–405. Ioannina.
———. 2009b. “The Particles Au and Aute in Ancient Greek as Topicalizing Devices.” In Bakker and Wakker 2009:83–109. Leiden.
———. 2010. “Coordinación, parataxis e hipotaxis en Griego antiguo.” In Sintaxis Griega, ed. D. Jiménez López. Liceus E-Excellence. El Portal de las Humanidades.
———. 2013. “Particles (Syntactic Features).” In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, ed. G. K. Giannakis. Brill Online.
Reynen, H. 1958a. “Die Partikel οὖν bei Homer.” Glotta 36:1–47.
———. 1958b. “Die Partikel οὖν bei Homer.” Glotta 37:67–102, 182–204.
Reynolds, D. F. 1995. Heroic Poets, Poetic Heroes: The Ethnography of Performance in an Arabic Oral Epic Tradition. Ithaca, NY.
Rhode, A. M. T. 1867. Über den Gebrauch der Partikel ἄρα bei Homer. Mörs.
Rhodes, P. J. 1988. Thucydides. History II. Warminster.
Ribbeck, W. 1867. Die Ritter des Aristophanes, Griechisch und Deutsch mit kritischen und erklärenden Anmerkungen. Berlin.
Richards, K. L., and P. Seedhouse. 2005. Applying Conversation Analysis. New York.
Richardson, N. M. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary VI. Cambridge.
Richardson, S. D. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville.
Riddell, J. 1867, ed. Plato, Apology. Oxford.
Rieckher, J. 1862. “Review of Bäumlein 1861.” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 85:467–487.
Riemer, F. W. 1823. Griechisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch für Anfänger und Freunde der griechischen Sprache. Jena.
Riemsdijk, H. C. van, and F. Zwarts. 1997. “Left Dislocation in Dutch and the Status of Copying Rules.” In Materials on Left Dislocation, ed. E. Anagnostopoulou, H. C. van Riemsdijk, and F. Zwarts, 13–29. Amsterdam.
Rijksbaron, A. 1976. Temporal and Causal Conjunctions in Ancient Greek with Special Reference to the Use of Epei and Hos in Herodotus. Amsterdam.
———. 1988. “The Discourse Function of the Imperfect.” In In the Footsteps of Raphael Kühner: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in Commemoration of the 150th Anniversary of the Publication of Raphael Kühner’s ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, II. Theil: Syntaxe, ed. A. Rijksbaron, H. A. Mulder, and G. C. Wakker, 237–254. Amsterdam.
———. 1991. Grammatical observations on Euripides’ Bacchae. Studies in Greek Philology 1. Amsterdam.
———, ed. 1997. New Approaches to Greek Particles. Proceedings of the Colloquium Held in Amsterdam, January 4-6, 1996, to Honour C.J. Ruijgh on the Occasion of His Retirement. Amsterdam.
———. 1997a. “Adverb or Connector? The Case of Kaide.” In Rijksbaron 1997:187–208.
———. 1997b. “Introduction.” In Rijksbaron 1997:1–14.
———. 2002 [1984]. The Syntax and Semantics of the Verb in Classical Greek: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Amsterdam.
———. 2007. Plato, Ion, or On the Iliad. Leiden.
———. 2009. “Negatives in Questions (and Answers): The Case of ‘Oukoun (…) Ou’. Or: Does Ancient Greek Have a Word for ‘no’?” In Early European Languages in the Eyes of Modern Linguistics: Proceedings of the Colloquium on the Ancient Indo-European Languages and the Early Stages of the Modern Romance, Germanic and Slavonic Languages, 28 September-1 October 2008, Brno, ed. K. Loudová and M. M. Žáková, 261–270. Brno.
———. 2011. “Introduction.” In The Historical Present in Thucydides: Semantics and Narrative, ed. J. Lallot, A. Rijksbaron, B. Jacquinod, and M. Buijs, 1–17. Leiden.
———. 2012. “The Imperfect as the Tense of Substitutionary Perception.” In Hyperboreans: Essays in Greek and Latin Poetry, Philosophy, Rhetoric and Linguistics, ed. P. da Cunha Corrêa, M. Martinho, J. M. Macedo, and A. Pinheiro Hasegawa, 331–375. São Paolo.
Rijksbaron, A., S. R. Slings, and G. C. Wakker. 2000. Beknopte Syntaxis van Het Klassiek Grieks. Lunteren.
Risch, E. 1969. “Die Verschiedenen Partikeln de im Griechischen.” In Studi Linguistici in Onore Di Vittore Pisani II, 831–843. Brescia.
Risselada, R. 1989. “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals.” In Actes du Ve Colloque de Linguistique Latine, ed. M. Lavency and D. Longrée, 367–378. Louvain-La-Neuve.
———. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam.
———. 1994. “Modo and Sane, or What to Do with Particles in Latin Directives.” In Linguistic Studies on Latin: Selected Papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, ed. J. Herman, 319–343. Amsterdam.
———. 1996. “And Now for Something Completely Different? Temporal Discourse Markers: Latin Nunc and English Now.” In On Latin: Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honour of Harm Pinkster, ed. R. Risselada, J. R. de Jong, and A. M. Bolkestein, 105–125. Amsterdam.
———. 1998a. “The discourse functions of sane: Latin marker of agreement in interaction and concession.” Journal of Pragmatics 30:225–244.
———. 1998b. “Tandem and Postremo: Two of a Kind?” In Latin in Use: Amsterdam Studies in the Pragmatics of Latin, ed. R. Risselada, 85–116. Amsterdam.
———. 2005. “Particles in Questions.” In Latina Lingua! Papers on Grammar IX 2, ed. G. Calboli, 663–679. Rome.
Risselada, R., and W. Spooren. 1998. “Introduction: Discourse Markers and Coherence Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 30:131–133.
Rissman, L. 1983. Love as War: Homeric Allusion in the Poetry of Sappho. Königstein.
Ritter, C. 1888. Untersuchungen über Plato: Die Echtheit und Chronologie der platonischen Schriften. Stuttgart.
———. 1921. “Review of Platonic Literature.” Bursian’s Jahresbericht 187:1–227.
Ritter, F. 1870. Sophokles’ König Oidipus. Leipzig.
Robbins, C. J. 1979. “A Colometric Arrangement of Cicero.” The Classical Journal 75:57–62.
Robertson, J. 1785. An Essay on Punctuation. London.
Robins, R. H. A. 1995. “The Authenticity of the Téchnē: The Status Quaestionis.” In Law and Sluiter 1995:13–26.
Robinson, D. 2006. Introducing Performative Pragmatics. New York.
Romm, J. S. 1998. Herodotus. New Haven.
Romilly, J. de. 1956. The Mind of Thucydides. Ithaca, NY and London.
———. 1974. Eschyle: Les Perses. Paris.
Rood, T. 1998. Thucydides: Narrative and Explanation. Oxford.
———. 2004. “Thucydides.” In Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. I. J. F. de Jong, R. Nünlist, and A. M. Bowie, 115–128. Leiden.
Rosén, H. B. 1987-1989. Herodotus. Historiae. 2 vols. Leipzig.
———. 1989. “On the Use and Function of Sentential Particles in Classical Latin.” In Actes du Ve colloque de linguistique Latine, Louvain-La-Neuve/Borzée 1989, ed. M. Lavency and D. Longrée, 391–402. Louvain-la-Neuve.
———. 1993. “Demum: A Message-Articulating Particle.” In Florilegium historiographiae linguisticae. Études d’historiographie de la linguistique et de grammaire comparée à la mémoire de Maurice Leroy, ed. J. de Clercq and P. Desmet, 173–184. Louvain-la-Neuve.
———. 1999. Latine loqui: Trends and Directions in the Crystallization of Classical Latin. München.
———. 2002. “Complementarity within the Pool of Cohesion Devices?” In Theory and Description in Latin Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XIth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Amsterdam, June 24 - 29, 2001, ed. A. M. Bolkestein, C. H. M. Kroon, H. Pinkster, H. W. Kemmelink, and R. Risselada, 333–346. Amsterdam.
———. 2003. “Immo—Its Atypical Use in Petronius.” In Petroniana. Gedenkschrift Für Hubert Petersmann, ed. J. Herman and H. Rosén, 167–181. Heidelberg.
———. 2007. “On Particles and Otiose Emendations: Epitactic Sed.” In L’ Art de la Philologie: Mélanges en L'honneur de Leena Löfstedt, ed. J. Härmä and M. Ursin, 177–184. Helsinki.
———. 2009. “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-Part Modification—The Contribution of Particles.” In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, ed. P. Baldi and P. Cuzzolin, 317–442. Berlin.
Rosenberg, E. 1874a. “Die Partikel τοίνυν in der attischen Dekas.” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 109 (=Jahrbücher für klassische Philologie 20):109–121.
———. 1874b. “Die Partikel τοίνυν.” Philologus 33:560.
Rosenthal, W. 1894. De Antiphontis in Particularum Usu Proprietate. Berlin.
Rösler, W. 1983. “Über Deixis und einige Aspekte mündlichen und schriftlichen Stils in antiker Lyrik.” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 9:7–28.
Rost, V. C. F., ed. 1836. Novum Lexicon Graecum Ex Christiani Tobiae Dammii Lexico Homerico-Pindarico. Leipzig.
———. 1859. Über Ableitung, Bedeutung und Gebrauch der Partikel οὖν. Gotha.
Rothkopf, E. Z., D. G. Fisher, and M. J. Billington. 1982. “Effects of Spatial Context during Acquisition on the Recall of Attributive Information.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8:126–138.
Rouchota, V. 1998. “Procedural Meaning and Parenthetical Discourse Markers.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:97–126.
Rouchota, V., and A. H. Jucker, eds. 1998. Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam.
Roulet, E. 1981. “Échanges, interventions et actes de langage dans la structure de la conservation.” Études de linguistique appliquée 44:7–39.
———. 1984. “Speech Acts, Discourse Structure, and Pragmatic Connectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 8:31–47.
———. 1995. Geneva School. Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. John Benjamins online.
———. 1997. “A Modular Approach to Discourse Structures.” Pragmatics 7:125–46.
———. 2006. “The Description of Text Relation Markers in the Geneva Model of Discourse Organization.” In Fischer 2006:115–131.
Roulet, E., A. Auchlin, J. Moeschler, C. Rubattel, and M. Schelling. 1985. L’articulation du Discours en Francais Contemporain. Bern.
Roulet, E., L. Fillietaz, and A. Grobet. 2001. Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de l'organisation du discours. Frankfurt am Main.
Roussel, L. 1960. Eschyle. Les Perses. Montpellier.
Rubin, D. C. 1995. Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-out Rhymes. Oxford.
Ruffell, I. 2008. “Audience and Emotion in the Reception of Greek Drama.” In Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin, ed. M. Revermann and P. Wilson, 37–58. Oxford.
Rühlemann, C. 2013. Narrative in English Conversation. Cambridge.
Ruijgh, C. J. 1957. L’élément Achéen Dans La Langue épique. Assen.
———. 1967. Études Sur La Grammaire et Le Vocabulaire Du Grec Mycénien. Amsterdam.
———. 1971. Autour de “TE Epique”: Études Sur La Syntaxe Grecque. Amsterdam.
———. 1981. “L’emploi de HTOI Chez Homere et Hesiode.” Mnemosyne 34:272–287.
———. 1985a. “Le Mycénien et Homère.” In Proceedings of the Mycenaean Colloquium of the VIIIth Congress of the International Federations of the Societies of Classical Studies (Dublin, 27. August-1st September 1984), ed. A. Morpurgo Davies and Y. Duhoux, 143–190. Louvain-la-Neuve.
———. 1985b. “L’emploi ‘Inceptif’ du Thème du Présent du Verbe Grec.” Mnemosyne 38:1–61.
———. 1990. “La Place des Enclitiques dans L’orde des Mots chez Homère après la Loi de Wackernagel.” In Sprachwissenschaft und Philologie. Jacob Wackernagel und die Indogermanistik heute, ed. E. Eichner and H. Rix, 213–233. Wiesbaden.
———. 1992. “L’emploi le plus ancien et les emplois plus récents de la particule κε/ἄν.” In La langue et les textes en Grec ancien: actes du colloque Pierre Chantraine (Grenoble, 5-8 Septembre 1989), ed. F. Létoublon, 75–84. Amsterdam.
———. 1995. “D’Homère aux origines proto-mycéniennes de la tradition épique.” In Homeric Questions, ed. J. P. Crielaard, 1–96. Amsterdam.
———. 2006. “The Use of the Demonstratives ὅδε, οὗτος and (ἐ)κεῖνος in Sophocles.” In Sophocles and the Greek Language: Aspects of Diction, Syntax and Pragmatics, ed. I. J. F. de Jong and A. Rijksbaron, 151–162. Leiden.
Ruiz Yamuza, E. 2000. “Objective and Subjective Modality Satellites in Ancient Greek: Tacha and Isoos.” Glotta 76:237–248.
———. 2012. “Los Matices de la Consecuencia: Ejemplificación con οὕτως.” In Lingüística XL. El lingüista del siglo XXI, ed. A. Cabedo Nebot and P. Infante Ríos, 225–232. Madrid.
Rumpel, J. 1883. Lexicon Pindaricum. Leipzig.
Runge, S. E. 2007. “Teaching Them What NOT to Do: The Nuances of Negation in the Greek New Testament.” Presentation at the Evangelical Theological Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, November 13–16.
Ruppenhofer, J., and L. A. Michaelis. 2010. “A Constructional Account of Genre-Based Argument Omissions.” Constructions and Frames 2:158–184.
Russell, J. A. 1980. “A Circumplex Model of Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:1161–1178.
Rusten, J. S. 1989. Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War, Book II. Cambridge.
———. 2015. “Kinesis in Thucydides’ Preface.” In Kinesis: Essays for Donald Lateiner on the Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion, ed. C. Clark, E. Foster, and J. P. Hallett. Ann Arbor.
Rutherford, R. B. 2010. “The Greek of Athenian Tragedy.” In Bakker 2010:441–454.
———. 2012. Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation. Cambridge.
Ryan, M.-L. 1980. “Fiction, Non-Factuals, and the Principle of Minimal Departure.” Poetics 9:403–422.
———. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington.
———. 2003. “Cognitive Maps and the Construction of Narrative Space.” In Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, ed. D. Herman, 214–242. Stanford.
———. 2007. “Toward a Definition of Narrative.” In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, ed. D. Herman, 22–35. Cambridge.
Saayman, F. 1990. “Conjunctions in Classical Greek Syntax.” Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa 33:91–102.
Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford.
Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50:696–735.
Saenger, P. H. 1997. Space between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford.
Saeve, H. 1864. Quaestiones de dicendi usu Thucydidis. I. De vi et usu particulae γάρ. Uppsala.
Sagawe, K. 1893. δέ Im Nachsatz bei Herodot. Breslau.
Saïd, S. 2002. “Herodotus and Tragedy.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. E. J. Bakker, I. J. F. de Jong, and H. van Wees. Leiden.
Sakita, T. 2006. “Parallelism in Conversation: Resonance, Schematization, and Extension from the Perspective of Dialogic Syntax and Cognitive Linguistics.” Pragmatics & Cognition 14:467–500.
Salmon, W. 2010. “Double Subjects and Verbal Demonstrations.” Journal of Pragmatics 42:3431–3443.
Sambre, P. 2010. “Framing from Grammar to Application.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24:1–15.
Sampson, J. 1997. “‘Genre,’ ‘style’ and ‘register’. Sources of Confusion?” Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire 73:699–708.
Sanders, E. 2013. “Sexual Jealousy and Eros in Euripides’ Medea.” In Sanders et al. 2013:41–58.
———. 2014. Envy and Jealousy in Classical Athens: A Socio-Psychological Approach. Oxford.
Sanders, E., C. Thumiger, C. Carey, and N. J. Lowe, eds. 2013. Erôs in Ancient Greece. Oxford.
Sanford, A. J., and C. Emmott. 2012. Mind, Brain and Narrative. Cambridge.
Sanford, A. J., and S.C. Garrod. 1998. “The Role of Scenario Mapping in Text Comprehension.” Discourse Processes 26:159–190.
Sanmartí Boncompte, F. 1951. La particula modal ἄν-κε. Barcelona.
Sansone, D. 1990. “The Computer and the Historia Augusta: A Note on Marriot.” Journal of Roman Studies 80:174–177.
Savino, M., M. Griceb, B. Gili Fivelac, and G. Marottad. 2006. “Intonational Cues to Discourse Structure in Bari and Pisa Italian: Perceptual Evidence.” In Atti Del convegno internazionale speech prosody 2006, 144–147. Dresden.
Sbisà, M. 1999. “Presuppositions, Implicature and Context in Text Understanding.” In Modeling and Using Context. Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference Context ’99, ed. P. Bouquet, L. Serafini, P. Brézillon, M. Benerecetti, and F. Castellani, 324–338. Trento.
Scardino, C. 2007. Gestaltung und Funktion der Reden bei Herodot und Thukydides/the Composition and Function of Speeches in Herodotus and Thucydides. Berlin.
———. 2012. “Indirect Discourse in Herodotus and Thucydides.” In Herodotus and Thucydides, ed. D. Lateiner and E. Foster, 67–96. Oxford.
Schadewaldt, W. 1938. Iliasstudien. Abhandlungen der philologisoh-historisohen Klasse der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 43. Nr. 6. Leipzig.
Schäfer, H. 1877. De Nonnullarum Particularum apud Antiphontem Usu. Göttingen.
Schank, R. C. 1995. Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence. Evanston.
Schank, R. C., and R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale.
Schegloff, E. A. 1967. The First Five Seconds: The Order of Conversational Openings. Berkeley.
———. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70:1075–1095.
———. 1984. “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 266–298. Cambridge.
———. 1987. “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-Taking Organization.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. G. Button and J. R. E. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon.
———. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Ochs et al. 1996:52–133. Cambridge.
———. 2001. “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. E. Hamilton, 229–249. Malden, MA.
———. 2006. “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in Which Culture Is Enacted.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson, 70–96. Oxford.
———. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge.
Schegloff, E. A., E. Ochs, and S. A. Thompson. 1996. “Introduction.” In Ochs et al. 1996:1-51.
Schein, S. L. 2013. Sophocles. Philoctetes. Cambridge.
Schellenberg, R. S. 2009. “‘They Spoke the Truest of Words’: Irony in the Speeches of Herodotus’s Histories.” Arethusa 42:131–150.
Schenkeveld, D. M. 1964. Studies in Demetrius On Style. Amsterdam.
———. 1982. “Studies in the History of Ancient Linguistics I: ΣΥΝΔΕΣΜΟΙ ΥΠΟΘΕΤΙΚΟΙ AND Ο ΕΑΝ ΕΠΙΖΕΥΚΤΙΚΟΣ.” Mnemosyne 35:248–268.
———. 1983. “Linguistic Theories in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.” Glotta 61:67–94.
———. 1988. “From Particula to Particle—The Genesis of a Class of Words.” In L’héritage des Grammairiens Latins de l'Antiquité Aux Lumières: Actes Du Colloque de Chantilly 2-4 Septembre 1987, ed. I. Rosier-Catach, 81–93. Paris.
———. 1994. “Scholarship and Grammar.” In La philologie Grecque à l’époque Hellénistique et Romaine, ed. F. Montanari, 263–301. Geneva.
———. 1995. “The Linguistic Contents of Dionysius’ Παραγγέλματα.” In Law and Sluiter 1995:41–53.
Schepe, K. 1878. De transitionis formulis quibus oratores Attici praeter Isocratem, Aeschinem, Demosthenemque utuntur. Bückeburg.
Scheppers, F. 2011. The Colon Hypothesis: Word Order, Discourse Segmentation and Discourse Coherence in Ancient Greek. Brussels.
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge.
———. 1990. “Between Text and Context: Deixis, Anaphora, and the Meaning of Then.” Text 10:245–270.
———. 1992. “Anaphoric Then: Aspectual Textual, and Epistemic Meaning.” Linguistics 30:753–792.
———. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford.
———. 2006. “Discourse Marker Research and Theory: Revisiting and.” In Fischer 2006:315–338. Amsterdam.
Schiffrin, D., A. De Fina, and A. Nylund, eds. 2010. Telling Stories. Washington, DC.
Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, and H. E. Hamilton. 2008. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA.
Schironi, F. 2010. “Technical Languages: Science and Medicine.” In Bakker 2010:338–353.
Schleppegrell, M. 1990. “Paratactic ‘Because.’” Journal of Pragmatics 16:291–306.
Schmerling, S. F. 1975. “Asymmetric Conjunction and Rules of Conversation.” In Cole and Morgan 1975:211–231.
Schmid, C. 1905. Homerische Studien I. Landau
Schmidt, Κ. Τ. Η. L. 1891. De usu part. τε earumque quae cum τοι compositae sunt apud oratores Atticos. Rostock.
Schmidt, K. E. A. 1859. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Grammatik des Griechischen und des Lateinischen. Halle.
Schneider, E. 1885. Quaestionum Hippocratearum specimen. Bonn.
Schneider, K. P., and A. Barron, eds. 2008. Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam.
Schneider, R., and M. Hartner. 2012. Blending and the Study of Narrative: Approaches and Applications. Narratologia 34. Berlin.
Schneidewin, F. W., and A. Nauck. 1861. Sophocles. König Oedipus. Berlin.
Schnyder, B. 1995. Angst in Szene gesetzt: zur Darstellung der Emotionen auf der Bühne des Aischylos. Tübingen.
Scholes, B. J, and R. J. Willis. 1990. “Prosodic and Syntactic Functions of Punctuation: A Contribution to the Study of Orality and Literacy.” Interchange 21:13–20.
Schömann, G. F. 1831. Isaei Orationes XI. Grieswald.
———. 1862. Die Lehre von den Redetheilen nach den Alten. Berlin.
Schonack, W. 1908. Curae Hippocrateae. Berlin.
Schöner, W. 1989. Aristophanes. Die elf erhaltenen Komödien. Vienna.
———. 1862. Die Lehre von den Redetheilen nach den alten dargestellt und beurtheilt. Berlin.
Schourup, L. 1982. Common Discourse Particles in English: ‘like’, ‘well’, ‘y’know’. New York.
———. 1999. “Discourse Markers.” Lingua 107:227–265.
———. 2011. “The Discourse Marker Now: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics 43:2110–2129.
Schraut, J. 1847. Die Griechischen Partikeln im Zusammenhange mit den ältesten Stämmen der Sprache. Bd. 1: μέν und δέ. Neuss.
———. 1848. Die Griechischen Partikeln im Zusammenhange mit den ältesten Stämmen der Sprache. Bd. 2: ἄν und κέν. Neuss.
———. 1849. Die Griechischen Partikeln im Zusammenhange mit den ältesten Stämmen der Sprache. Bd. 3: γέ, ἄρα, γάρ. Neuss.
———. 1857. Über die Bedeutung der Partikel γάρ in den scheinbar vorgeschobenen Sätzen. Rastatt.
Schrickx, J. G. 2009. “Namque als Variante von Nam?” Mnemosyne 62:250–271.
———. 2010. “Die Partikel Nempe Diskurspragmatisch Neu Betrachtet.” In Latin Linguistics Today. Akten des 15. internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik Innsbruck, 4.–9. April 2009, ed. P. Anreiter and M. Kienpointner, 613–624. Innsbruck.
———. 2011. Lateinische Epistemische Partikeln: Nempe, Quippe, Scilicet, Videlicet Und Nimirum. Leiden.
———. 2014. “Latin Commitment-Markers: Scilicet and Videlicet.” In Certainty—Uncertainty—and the Attitudinal Space in between, ed. S. Cantarini, W. Abraham, and E. Leiss 285–296. Studies in Language Companion Series 165. Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
Schröder, O. 1927. Aristophanes. Die Vögel. Erklärt von Theodor Kock. Neue Bearbeitung. 4th ed. Berlin.
Schuren, L. 2015. Shared Storytelling in Euripidean Stichomythia. Leiden.
Schütz, Christian G. 1806 [1782]. Henrici Hoogeveen Doctrina particularum Graecarum. Recensuit breviavit et auxit C. G. Schütz. 2nd ed. Leipzig.
Schwarz-Friesel, M. 2013. Sprache und Emotion. 2nd ed. Tübingen.
Schweighaeuser, J. 1824. Lexicon Herodoteum. Strasbourg. [1840 edition available at:]
Schwyzer, E., and A. Debrunner. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Bd. 2: Syntax. Munich.
Scodel, R. 2000. “Verbal Performance and Euripidean Rhetoric.” In Euripides and Tragic Theatre in the Late Fifth Century, ed. M. J. Cropp, 129–144. Champaign.
———. 2012. “ἦ and Theory of Mind in the Iliad.” In Homer, gedeutet durch ein großes Lexikon: Akten des Hamburger Kolloquiums vom 6.-8. Oktober 2010 zum Abschluss des Lexikons des Frühgriechischen Epos, ed. M. Meier-Brügger, 319–334. Berlin.
Scott, M., and C. Tribble. 2006. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam.
Scott, W. C. 1974. The Oral Nature of the Homeric Simile. Leiden.
———. 2005. “The Patterning of the Similes in Book 2 of the Iliad.” In Approaches to Homer: Ancient and Modern., ed. R. J. Rabel, 21–54. Swansea.
———. 2009. The Artistry of the Homeric Simile. Hanover, NH.
Seaford, R. 1996. Euripides. Bacchae. Warminster.
Seager, J. 1829. Hoogeveen’s Greek Particles. Abridged and Translated into English. London.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge.
———. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Cole and Morgan 1975:59–82.
———. 1979. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, 1–29. Cambridge.
Segal, C. 1986. Pindar’s Mythmaking: The Fourth Pythian Ode. Princeton.
Segal, E. M., J. F. Duchan, and P. J. Scott. 1991. “The Role of Interclausal Connectives in Narrative Structuring: Evidence From Adults’ Interpretations of Simple Stories.” Discourse Processes 14:27–54.
Seiler, H. 1950. Die Primären Griechischen Steigerungsformen. Hamburg.
Seiler, J. 1908. “Wie ‘gewinnen wir Homer die Art ab’?” Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 62:161–181.
Sekali, M. 2007. “‘He’s a Cop but He Isn’t a Bastard'. An Enunciative Approach to Some Pragmatic Effects of the Coordinator but.” In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks, ed. A. Celle and E. Huart, 155–175. Amsterdam.
Selkirk, E. O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA.
Selting, M. 1994. “Emphatic Speech Style—with Special Focus on the Prosodic Signalling of Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 22:375–408.
———. 1996. “On the Interplay of Syntax and Prosody in the Constitution of Turn-Constructional Units and Turns in Conversation.” Pragmatics 6:357–388.
Selting, M., and E. Couper-Kuhlen, eds. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam.
Sens, A. 2000. “The Particle Htoi in Apollonian Narrative.” In Apollonius Rhodius, ed. M. A. Harder, R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker, 173–193. Leuven.
Sernatinger, B. 1874. De particula γάρ, partes I et II. Rastatt.
Shalev, D. 2001. “Illocutionary Clauses Accompanying Questions in Greek Drama and Platonic Dialogue.” Mnemosyne 54:531–561.
Shapiro, S. O. 1996. “Herodotus and Solon.” Classical Antiquity 15:348–364.
———. 2000. “Proverbial Wisdom in Herodotus.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 130:89–118.
Sherzer, J. 1982. “Poetic Structuring of Kuna Discourse: The Line.” Language in Society 11:371–390.
Shipp, G. P. 1972. Studies in the Language of Homer. 2nd ed. Cambridge.
Shoaps, R. A. 2002. “‘Pray Earnestly’: The Textual Reconstruction of Personal Involvement in Pentecostal Prayer and Song.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12:34–71.
Shorey, P. 1907. “The Force of καίτοι.” The Classical Journal 3:27–30.
———. 1919. “On δέ γε in Retort.” Classical Philology 14:165–174.
———. 1926. “Statistics of Style in the Seventh Platonic Epistle (δ᾽ οὖν).” Classical Philology 21:258.
———. 1928. “The Pathos and Humor of Au.” Classical Philology 23:285–287.
———. 1933. “On the Erotikos of Lysias in Plato’s Phaedrus.” Classical Philology 28:131–132.
Sicking, C. M. J. 1986. “Griekse Partikels: Definitie en Classificatie.” Lampas 19:125–141.
———. 1991. “The Distribution of Aorist and Present Tense Stem Forms in Greek, Especially in the Imperative.” Glotta 69:14–43, 154–170.
———. 1993. “Devices for Text Articulation in Lysias I and XII.” In Van Ophuijsen and Sicking 1993:1–66.
———. 1996a. “Aspect Choice: Time Reference or Discourse Function?” In Two Studies in the Semantics of the Verb in Classical Greek, ed. C. M. J. Sicking and P. Stork, 1–118. Leiden.
———. 1996b. “Partikels in Vragen bij Plato.” Lampas 29:446–463.
———. 1997. “Particles in Questions in Plato.” In Rijksbaron 1997:157–174.
Sideras, A. 1971. Aeschylus Homericus: Untersuchungen zu den Homerismen der aischyleischen Sprache. Göttingen.
Sidnell, J. 2007. “Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36:229–244.
———. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Malden, MA.
Sidnell, J., and N. J. Enfield. 2012. “Language Diversity and Social Action: A Third Locus of Linguistic Relativity.” Current Anthropology 53:302–333.
Siebenborn, E. 1976. Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien: Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik. Amsterdam.
Sier, K. 1988. Die lyrischen Partien des Choephoren des Aischylos. Stuttgart.
Silk, M. S. 1998. “Style, Voice and Authority in the Choruses of Greek Drama.” Der Chor im antiken und modernen Drama, ed. P. Riemer and B. Zimmermann, 1–26. Stuttgart.
———. 2010. “The Language of Greek Lyric Poetry.” In Bakker 2010:424–440.
Sinclair, J. M., and R. M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London.
Skelton, R. 1949. Modern English Punctuation. London.
Sköries, U. 1998. “Features of a Blame Type Using and: An Analysis of an Example.” Journal of Pragmatics 30:49–58.
———. 1999. Bedeutung und Funktion von and Als Dialogische Instruktion. Frankfurt am Main.
Slater, N. W. 2002. Spectator Politics: Metatheatre and Performance in Aristophanes. Philadelphia.
Slater, W. J. 1969. Lexicon to Pindar. Berlin.
———. 1983. “Lyric Narrative: Structure and Principle.” Classical Antiquity 2:117–132.
Slings, S. R. 1980. “KAI Adversativum: Some Thoughts on the Semantics of Coordination.” In Linguistic Studies Offered to Berthe Siertsema, ed. D. J. van Alkemade et al., 101–125. Amsterdam.
———. 1992a. “Review of Bakker 1988, Linguistics and Formulas in Homer: Scalarity and the Description of the Particle per.” Mnemosyne 45:400–403.
———. 1992b. “Written and Spoken Language: An Exercise in the Pragmatics of the Greek Language.” Classical Philology 87:95–109.
———. 1997a. “Adversative Relators between PUSH and POP.” Rijksbaron 1997:101–29. Amsterdam.
———. 1997b. “Figures of Speech and Their Lookalikes: Two Further Exercises in the Pragmatics of the Greek Sentence.” In Grammar as Interpretation: Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, ed. E. J. Bakker, 169–214. Leiden.
———. 1998. “Δέ or δή in a « Defixio » from Olbia ?” Mnemosyne 51:84–85.
———. 2002. “Figures of Speech in Aristophanes.” In The Language of Greek Comedy, ed. A. Willi, 99–109. Oxford.
Sluiter, I. 1997. “Parapleromatic Lucubrations.” In Rijksbaron 1997:233–246.
Smith, C. F. 1900. “Traces of Epic Usage in Thucydides.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 31:69–81.
Smith, C. S. 2003. Modes of Discourse: The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge.
Smith, W., W. Wayte, and G. E. Marindin. 1890. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. London.
Smyth, H. W. 1956. Greek Grammar. Edition revised by G. M. Messing. Cambridge, MA.
———. 1963. Aeschylus. Suppliant Maidens, Persians, Prometheus, Seven against Thebes. London and Cambridge.
Snell, B., and H. Maehler. 1971. Pindari carmina cum fragmentis. Leipzig.
Snell, B., U. Fleischer, and H. J. Mette. 1955–2010. Lexikon des frühgriechischen Epos (LfgrE). 4 vols. Göttingen.
Solmsen, F. 1974. Two Crucial Decisions in Herodotus. Amsterdam.
———. 1982. “Two Crucial Decisions in Herodotus.” In Kleine Schriften III, 78–109. Hildesheim.
Solmsen, F., and R. Merkelbach, eds. 1970. Hesiodi Theogonia, Opera et dies, Scutum. Oxford.
Solmsen, L. 1943. “Speeches in Herodotus’ Account of the Ionic Revolt.” American Journal of Philology 64:194–207.
———. 1944. “Speeches in Herodotus’ Account of the Battle of Plataea.” Classical Philology 39:241–253.
Sommerstein, A. H. 1987. Aristophanes. Birds. Warminster.
———. 1989. Aeschylus. Eumenides. Cambridge.
———. 1990. Aristophanes. Lysistrata. Warminster.
———. 1991. Clouds by Aristophanes. 3rd ed. Warminster.
———. 2008a. Aeschylus. Oresteia. London.
———. 2008b. Aeschylus. Persians, Seven against Thebes, Suppliants, Prometheus Bound. London.
———. 2010. Aeschylean Tragedy. Bristol.
Sorjonen, M.-L. 2001. Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam.
Spencer-Datey, H. 2000. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. London.
Spengel, L. 1862. “τε in Antiphon.” Rheinisches Museum 17:166–169.
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1995 [1986]. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford.
Spitzner, F. 1832. Homeri Ilias. Göttingen.
Sobolewski, S. 1893 “οὐδέ and καὶ οὐ.” Russische Philologische Rundschau 2:48.
Squartini, M. 2013. “From TAM to Discourse: The Role of Information Status in North-Western Italian Già ‘already.’” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. L. Degand, B. Cornillie, and P. Pietrandrea, 163–190. Amsterdam.
Stadter, P. A., ed. 1973. The Speeches in Thucydides. Chapel Hill.
Stahl, H.-P. 1973. “Speeches and Course of Events in Book Six and Seven of Thucydides.” In Stadter 1973:60-77.
———. 2012. “Herodotus and Thucydides on Blind Decisions Preceding Military Action.” In Thucydides and Herodotus, ed. E. Foster and D. Lateiner. Oxford.
Stahl, J. M. 1902. “Über Eine Besondere Bedeutung von γάρ.” Rheinisches Museum 52:1–7.
———. 1907. Kritisch-Historische Syntax des griechischen Verbums der klassischen Zeit. Heidelberg.
Stainton, R. J. 1994. “Using Non-Sentences: An Application of Relevance Theory.” Pragmatics & Cognition 2:269–284.
Stalnaker, R. C. 1974. “Pragmatic Presupposition.” In Semantics and Philosophy, ed. M. K. Muniz and P. K. Unger, 197–213. New York.
Stanford, W. B. 1958. Aristophanes. The Frogs. London.
———. 1963. Sophocles. Ajax. London.
———. 1983. Greek Tragedy and the Emotions. London.
Starkie, W. J. M. 1911. Aristophanes. The Clouds. London.
Steen, G. 2005. “Basic Discourse Acts: Toward a Psychological Theory of Discourse Segmentation.” In Cognitive Linguistics. Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, ed. F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. S. Peña Cervel, 283–312. Berlin.
Steen, G. A. H. van. 2000. Venom in Verse: Aristophanes in Modern Greece. Princeton.
Stein, H. 1884. Herodoti Historiae. Bern.
Steiner, D. 2010. Homer, Odyssey Books XVII-XVIII. Cambridge.
Steinthal, H. 1863. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern: Mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. Cambridge.
Stenström, A.-B. 1994. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London.
———. 1998. “From Sentence to Discourse: Cos (because) in Teenage Talk.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:127–146.
Stephens, E. 1837. A Treatise on the Greek Expletive Particles. Oxford.
Stevens, P. T. 1971. Euripides. Andromache. Oxford.
———. 1976. Colloquial Expressions in Euripides. Wiesbaden.
Stinton, T. C. W. 1977. “Pause and Period in the Lyrics of Greek Tragedy.” The Classical Quarterly 27:27–66.
Stivers, T., N. J. Enfield, and S. C. Levinson. 2007. “Person Reference in Interaction.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. N. J. Enfield and T. Stivers, 1–20. Cambridge.
Stoddard, K. 2004. The Narrative Voice in the Theogony of Hesiod. Leiden.
Strassler, R. B. 1996. The Landmark Thucydides. With the translation of R. Crawley. New York.
Strauss Clay, J. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton.
———. 2011. Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the IIiad. Cambridge.
Streeck, J. 1995. “On Projection.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence, ed. E. N. Goody, 87–110. Cambridge.
———. 2009. “Forward-Gesturing.” Discourse Processes 46:161–179.
Streeck, J., and J. S. Jordan. 2009. “Projection and Anticipation: The Forward-Looking Nature of Embodied Communication.” Discourse Processes 46:93–102.
Stroud, R. S. 1987. “‘Wie es eigentlich gewesen’ and Thucydides 2.48. 3.” Hermes 115:379–382.
———. 1994. “Thucydides and Corinth.” Chiron 24:267–304.
Sturm, J. 1882. Geschichtliche Entwickelung der Constructionen mit ΠΡΙΝ. Würzburg.
Sturz, F. W. 1801–1804. Lexicon Xenophonteum. 4 vols. Leipzig. Vol. 1: Vol. 3:
Stürmer, F. 1912. “Über die Partikel δή bei Homer.” Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 32:1844–1845.
Stvan, L. S. 2006. “Diachronic Change in the Discourse Markers Why and Say in American English.” In Corpus Linguistics, ed. A. M. Hornero Corsico, M. J. Luzón, and S. Murillo Ornat, 61–76. Bern.
Sudhoff, S. 2012. “Fokuspartikelinventare des Niederländischen und Deutschen.” In Nicht-flektierende Wortarten, ed. B. Rothstein, 203–223. Berlin.
Svartvik, J. 1980. “Well in Conversation.” In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, ed. Greenbaum S., G. N. Leech, and J. Svartvik, 167–177. London.
Swan, T. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation. Oslo.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge.
Swift, L. A. 2010. The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Tragic Lyric. Oxford.
Swiggers, P., and A. Wouters, eds. 2002. Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity. Leuven.
———, eds. 2003. Syntax in Antiquity. Leuven.
Tabachovitz, D. 1943. Études sur le Grec de la basse époque. Uppsala.
———. 1951. Homerische εἰ-Sätze: eine sprachpsychologische Studie. Lund.
Taboada, M. 2004. Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam.
———. 2006. “Discourse Markers as Signals (or Not) of Rhetorical Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 38:567–592.
Takahara, P. O. 1998. “Pragmatic Functions of the English Discourse Marker Anyway and Its Corresponding Contrastive Japanese Discourse Markers.” In Jucker and Ziv 1998:327–351.
Takanashi, H. 2011. “Complementary Stylistic Resonance in Japanese Play Framing.” Pragmatics 21:231–264.
Talmy, L. 1995. “Narrative Structure in a Cognitive Framework.” In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, ed. J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, and L. E. Hewitt, 421–460. Hillsdale, NJ.
Tannen, D. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood.
Tannen, D., and C. Kakava. 1992. “Power and Solidarity in Modern Greek Conversation: Disagreeing to Agree.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10:11–34.
Tanskanen, S. K. 2006. Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam.
Taplin, O. 1977. “Did Greek Dramatists Write Stage Instructions?” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23:121–132.
———. 1978. Greek Tragedy in Action. London.
———. 1986. “Fifth-Century Tragedy and Comedy: A Synkrisis.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 106:163–174.
———. 1989. The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy. Oxford.
Tarriño Ruiz, E. 2009. “Adverbios Y Partículas.” In Sintaxis Del Latín Clásico, ed. J. M. Baños, 349–374. Madrid.
Tate, J. 1956. “Review: Greek Particles.” The Classical Review n.s. 6:125–126.
Taylor, A. 1994. “The Change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek.” Language Variation and Change 6:1–37.
———. 1996. “A Prosodic Account of Clitic Position in Ancient Greek.” In Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena, ed. A. L. Halpern and A. M. Zwicky, 477–503. Stanford.
Taylor, D. J. 1987. “Rethinking the History of Language Science in Classical Antiquity.” In The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period, ed. D. J. Taylor, 1–16. Amsterdam.
———, ed. 1987. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period. Amsterdam.
Terry, R. B. 1995. A Discourse Analysis of First Corinthians. Dallas.
Teuffel, W. S., and N. Wecklein. 1901. Aeschylos’ Perser. Leipzig.
Theodoropoulou, M. 2012. “The Emotion Seeks to Be Expressed: Thoughts from a Linguist’s Point of View.” In Chaniotis 2012:433–468. Stuttgart.
Thesleff, H. 1954. Studies on Intensification in Early and Classical Greek. Leipzig.
Thiel, H. van. 1996. Homeri Ilias. Hildesheim.
Thiemann, C. 1881. “Über den Gebrauch der Partikel δή und ihre Bedeutung bei Homer.” Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen 35:530–534.
Thiersch, F. 1826. Griechische Grammatik vorzüglich des homerischen Dialektes. 3rd ed. Leipzig.
———. 1852. “Disquisitiones de analogiae Graecae capitibus minus cognitis I.” Abhandlungen der Philosophisch-Philologischen Classe der königlich bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 6:377–454.
———. 1855. “Disquisitiones analogiae Graecae capitibus minus cognitis II.” Abhandlungen der Philosophisch-Philologischen Classe der königlich bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 7:309–388.
Thomas, F. W. 1894. “ἤδη and δή in Homer.” Journal of Philology 23:81–115.
Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction. London.
Thompson, S. A. 1983. “Grammar and Discourse: The English Detached Participial Clause.” In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, ed. F. Klein-Andreu, 43–65. New York.
Thompson, S. A., and W. C. Mann. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8:243–281.
Thorndyke, P. W. 1977. “Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse.” Cognitive Psychology 9:77–110.
Thrall, M. E. 1962. Greek Particles in the New Testament: Linguistic and Exegetical Studies. Leiden.
Thumb, A., and E. Kieckers. 1932. Handbuch der griechischen Dialekte. 2nd ed. Heidelberg.
Thumiger, C. 2013. “Mad Eros and Eroticized Madness in Tragedy.” In Sanders et al. 2013:27–40.
Thummer, E. 1969. Pindar. Die Isthmischen Gedichte. Heidelberg.
Thyresson, I. L. 1977. The Particles in Epicurus. Lund.
Tichy, E. 2015. “Ilias Diachronica Eta–Ilias Diachronica Pi (Iliad 7 to 16).” FreiDok—University of Freiburg.
Titrud, K. 1991. “The Overlooked Καί in the Greek New Testament.” Notes on Translation 5:1–28.
Todd, O. J. 1932. Index Aristophaneus. Cambridge, MA.
Todorov, T., W. Empson, J. Cohen, F. Rigolot, and G. Genette. 1979. Sémantique de La Poésie. Paris.
Tofilski, L. 2002. “Modality in Pindar’s Odes: Study of Pragmatic-Systematic Functions of ἄν/κε(ν) Particle with the Optative in the Main Clause in Greek.” Eos 89:353–360.
Tomlin, R. S. 1997. “Mapping Conceptual Representations into Linguistic Representations: The Role of Attention in Grammar.” In Language and Conceptualization, ed. E. Pederson and J. Nuyts, 162–189. Cambridge.
Tompkins, D. P. 1972. “Stylistic Characterization in Thucydides: Nicias and Alcibiades.” Yale Classical Studies 22:181–214.
———. 2013. “The Language of Pericles.” In Thucydides Between History and Literature, ed. A. Tsakmakis and M. Tamiolaki, 447–464. Berlin.
Torck, D. M. F. 1996. Aspects de la Causalité Discursive en Français Oral Contemporain. PhD diss., VU University Amsterdam.
Tournier, E. 1833. “Sur la signification de quelques particules Grecques.” Revue de Philologie 7:33–44, 133–139.
Traglia, A., ed. 1974. Marcus Terentius Varro. Opere. Turin.
Traugott, E. Closs. 1986. “On the Origins of ‘AND’ and ‘BUT’ Connectives in English.” Studies in Language 10:137–150.
———. 2007. “Discussion Article: Discourse Markers, Modal Particles, and Contrastive Analysis, Synchronic and Diachronic.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6:139–157.
Traugott, E. Closs., and R. B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge.
Traugott, E. Closs., and G. Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford.
Trenkner, S. 1960. Le Style καί dans le Récit Attique Oral. Assen.
Truckenbrodt, H. 2004. “Zur Strukturbedeutung von Interrogativsätzen.” Linguistische Berichte 199:313–350.
Truss, L. 2003. Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. London.
Tsagalis, C. 2010. “The Dynamic Hypertext: Lists and Catalogues in the Homeric Epics.” Trends in Classics 2:323–347.
———. 2012. From Listeners to Viewers: Space in the Iliad. Cambridge, MA.
Tsakmakis, A. 2010. “On the Meaning and Uses of γε in Comic Conversation.” In Παραχορήγημα II, ed. G. M. Sifakis and S. Tsitsiridis, 345–359.
Tucker, T. G. 1906. The Frogs of Aristophanes. London.
———. 1908. Aeschylus. The Seven against Thebes. Cambridge.
Turner, F., and E. Pöppel. 1983. “The Neural Lyre: Poetic Meter, the Brain, and Time.” Poetry 142:277–307.
Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York.
Txurruka, I. G. 2003. “The natural language conjunction and”. Linguistics and Philosophy 26:255–285.
Urgelles-Coll, M. 2010. The Syntax and Semantics of Discourse Markers. London.
Usener, H. 1878. “Grammatische Bemerkungen. VII δὴ ἄν.” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 48:66–67.
Uthoff, H. 1884. Quaestiones Hippocrateae. Marburg.
Vahlen, J. 1885. “Appositional γάρ.” In Aristotelis de Arte Poetica Liber: tertiis curis recognovit et adnotatione critica auxit, ed. J. Vahlen, 99–102. 3rd ed. Leipzig.
Valdmets, A. 2013. “Modal Particles, Discourse Markers, and Adverbs with Lt-Suffix in Estonian.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. L. Degand, B. Cornillie, and P. Pietrandrea, 107–132. Amsterdam.
Vandelanotte, L. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin.
Vandeweghe, W. 1992. Perspektivische evaluatie in het Nederlands. De partikels van de AL/NOG/PAS-groep. Ghent.
Vannicelli, P. Forthcoming. Erodoto. Le Storie. Libro VII. Milan.
Vara, J. 1974. “Huella de H Procedente de S en la Iliada, y el Origen de la Épica.” Emerita: boletín de linguística y filología clásica 42:287–304.
Vatri, A. 2012. “The Physiology of Ancient Greek Reading.” The Classical Quarterly 62:633–647.
Venneman, T. 1975. “Topic, Sentence Accent, and Ellipsis: A Proposal for Their Formal Treatment.” In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, ed. E.L. Keenan, 313–328. Cambridge.
Verdenius, W. J. 1947. “Notes on the Presocratics.” Mnemosyne, ser. 3, 13:271–289.
———. 1955. “Notes on Hippocrates ‘Airs Waters Places.’” Mnemosyne, ser. 4, 8:14–18.
———. 1956. “Review of Denniston 1954.” Mnemosyne 9:248–252.
———. 1974. “Inceptive δέ again.” Mnemosyne 27:173–174.
———. 1975. “Adversative καί Again.” Mnemosyne 28:188–190.
———. 1982. “Pindar’s Second Isthmian Ode: A Commentary.” Mnemosyne 35:1–37.
Verdenius, W. J., and J. H. Waszink. 1946. Aristotle on coming-to-be and passing-away: Some comments. Leiden.
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford.
Vermeule, E. 1979. Aspects of Death in Early Greek Art and Poetry. Berkeley.
Vernant, J.-P., and P. E. Vidal-Naquet. 1986. Mythe et Tragédie en Grèce Ancienne. Paris.
Verrall, A. W. 1881. The Medea of Euripides. London.
Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London.
Vidal-Naquet, P. E., and A. Szegedy-Maszak. 1986. “Land and Sacrifice in the Odyssey: A Study of Religious and Mythical Meanings.” In The Black Hunter: Forms of Thought and Forms of Society in the Greek World, 15–38. Baltimore.
Viger, F. 1752 [1627]. De Praecipuis Graecae Dictionis Idiotismis Liber. Leiden.
———. 1834. De Praecipuis Graecae Dictionis Idiotismis Liber cum Animadversionibus H. Hoogevenii, et I.c. Zeunii. Ed. et Annotationes Addidit G. Hermannus. 4th ed. Leipzig.
Viljamaa, T. 2003. “Colon and Comma. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on the Sentence Structure.” Swiggers and Wouters 2003:163–178.
Villa, J. de la. 2000. “La subordinación en griego antiguo: análisis y perspectivas.” In Actas del X Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos I, ed. E. Crespo and M. J. Barrios, 117–165. Madrid.
Visconti, J. 2009. “From ‘textual’ to ‘interpersonal’: On the Diachrony of the Italian Particle Mica.” Journal of Pragmatics 41:937–950.
Visser, E. 1987. Homerische Versifikationstechnik: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt.
Visvardi, E. 2015. Emotion in Action: Thucydides and the Tragic Chorus. Leiden.
Viti, C. 2006. “And in the Early Indo-European Languages.” Archivio Glottologico Italiano 91:129–165.
———. 2008. “The Meanings of Coordination in the Early Indo-European Languages.” Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 24:35–64.
Voloshinov, V. N. 1973 [1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York.
Voutilainen, L., P. Henttonen, M. Kahri, M. Kivioja, N. Ravaja, and M. Sams. 2014. “Affective Stance, Ambivalence, and Psychophysiological Responses during Conversational Storytelling.” Journal of Pragmatics 68:1–24.
Waanders, F. M. J. 1983. The History of Telos and Teleō in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam.
———. 1997. “Particulars of Some Proto-Indo-European Particles.” In Rijksbaron 1997:269–274.
Wace, A. J. B., and F. H. H. Stubbings. 1962. A Companion to Homer. London.
Wackernagel, J. 1892. “Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung.” Indogermanische Forschungen 1:333–436.
———. 1893. Beiträge zur Lehre vom griechischen Akzent. Basel.
———. 1895. “Miszellen zur griechischen Grammatik.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 33:1-62.
———. 1916. “Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Homer.” Glotta 7:161–319.
———. 1920. Vorlesungen über Syntax: Mit besonderer berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Basel.
Wähdel, H. 1869. Über Bedeutung und Gebrauch der Partikel οὖν beim Aristophanes. Stralsund.
Wakker, G. C. 1994. Conditions and Conditionals: An Investigation of Ancient Greek. Amsterdam.
———. 1995. “‘Welaan dan dus nu.’ Partikels in Sophocles.” Lampas 28:250–270.
———. 1996. “The Discourse Function of Particles. Some Observations on the Use of man/mhn in Theocritus.” In Hellenistica Groningana. Bd. 2: Theocritus, ed. M.A. Harder, R.F. Regtuit, and G.C. Wakker, 247–63. Groningen.
———. 1997a. “Emphasis and Affirmation: Some Aspects of μην in Tragedy.” In Rijksbaron 1997:209–231.
———. 1997b. “Modal Particles and Different Points of View in Herodotus and Thucydides.” In Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, ed. E. J. Bakker, 215–250. Leiden.
———. 2001. “Le problème d’ἔτι μέν avec Aoriste.” Syntaktika 22:1–14.
———. 2002. “Une première description de ἤδη chez Xénophon.” Syntaktika 23:1-14.
———. 2009a. Daarom dan dus. Kleine woorden, grote effecten. Groningen.
———. 2009b. “‘Well I Will Now Present My Arguments.’ Discourse Cohesion Marked by Oun and Toinun in Lysias.” In Bakker and Wakker 2009:63–81.
Wälchli, B. 2005. Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford.
Walker, A. D. 1993. “Enargeia and the Spectator in Greek Historiography.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 123:353–377.
Walrod, M. 2006. “The marker is the message: the influence of discourse markers and particles on textual meaning.” Presented at the Tenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (10­ICAL). Palawan, January 17–20.
Walsh, T. R. 2005. Fighting Words and Feuding Words: Anger and the Homeric Poems. Lanham, MD.
Waring, H. Z. 2003. “‘Also’ as a Discourse Marker: Its Use in Disjunctive and Disaffiliative Environments.” Discourse Studies 5:415–436.
Waters, K. H. 1966. “The Purpose of Dramatisation in Herodotos.” Historia 15:157–171.
Wathelet, P. 1964. “Mycénien et grec d’Homère, 2: La particule καί.” L’antiquité Classique 33:10–44.
———. 1997. “Les particules ke(n) et an dans les formules de l’épopée Homérique.” In Rijksbaron 1997:247–268.
Watkins, C. 1977. “À propos de ΜΗΝΙΣ.” Bulletin de la société de linguistique de Paris 72:187–209.
Watts, R. J. 1989. “Taking the Pitcher to the Well.” Journal of Pragmatics 18:203–231.
Weber, H. 1864. Die dorische Partikel Ka: Ein Beitrag zu der Lehre von den griechischen Dialekten. Halle.
———. 1884. “γάρ.” Philologische Rundschau 4:1078.
Wecklein, N. 1885. Ausgewählte Tragödien des Euripides. Bd. 4: Hippolytos. Leipzig.
———. 1902. Aeschylus. Die Schutzflehenden. Leipzig.
———. 1903. Euripides. Bakchen. 2nd ed. Leipzig.
Wehr, J. 1869. Quaestiones Aristophaneae. Pars I, De Particularum Nonnullarum Usu. Göttingen.
Wells, J. B. 2009. Pindar’s Verbal Art: An Ethnographic Study of Epinician Style. Washington, DC.
Wennerstrom, A. K. 2001. The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford.
Wentzel, E. 1847. Über den Gebrauch der Partikel τε bei Homer. Glogau.
Werkhofer, K. T. 1992. “Traditional and Modern Views: The Social Constitution and the Power of Politeness.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, ed. R. J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich, 155–199. Berlin.
Werres, J. 1936. Die Beteuerungsformeln in der attischen Komödie. Bonn.
West, M. L. 1966. Hesiod. Theogony. Oxford.
———. 1990. “Colloquialisms and Naïve Style in Aeschylus.” In Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, ed. E. M. Craik, 3–12. Oxford.
———. 1999. Homeri Ilias. 2 vols. Berlin.
Westlake, H. D. 1941. “Nicias in Thucydides.” Classical Quarterly 35:58–65.
———. 1968. Individuals in Thucydides. Cambridge.
Wetzell, C. 1879. Beiträge zu dem Gebrauche einiger Partikeln bei Antiphon. Frankfurt am Main.
Weydt, H. 1969. Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg.
———. 1979. Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache. Berlin.
———. 1983. Partikeln und Interaktion. Tübingen.
———, ed. 1989. Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin.
Weydt, H., and K.-H. Ehlers. 1987. Partikel-Bibliographie Internationale Sprachenforschung zu Partikeln und Interjektionen. Frankfurt.
Widdowson, H. G. 1979. “Rules and Procedures in Discourse Analysis.” In The Development of Conversation and Discourse, ed. T. Myers, 61–71. Edinburgh.
———. 1995. “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4:157–172.
Wierzbicka, A. 1986a. “A Semantic Metalanguage for the Description and Comparison of Illocutionary Meanings.” Journal of Pragmatics 10:67–107.
———. 1986b. “Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 10:519–534.
———. 1992. “The Semantics of Interjection.” Journal of Pragmatics 18:159–192.
———. 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge.
———. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford.
———. 2010. Experience, Evidence, and Sense: The Hidden Cultural Legacy of English. Oxford.
Wiesner, J. 1999. “Appendix: ausführliche Darstellung der koordinierenden und nuancierenden Partikeln.” In Repetitorium des griechischen Syntax, ed. H. Menge, 247–364. 10th ed. Darmstadt.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1895. Euripides. Herakles. 2nd ed. Berlin.
———. 1927. Aristophanes. Lysistrate. Berlin.
Wiles, D. 2007. Mask and Performance in Greek Tragedy: From Ancient Festival to Modern Experimentation. Cambridge.
———. 2008. “The Poetics of the Mask in Old Comedy.” In Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin, ed. M. Revermann and P. Wilson, 374–392. Oxford.
Wilkins, J. 1993. Euripides, Heraclidae. Oxford.
Willi, A. 2003. “Sophistic Innovations.” In The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek, 118–156. Oxford.
———. 2010a. “Register Variation.” In Bakker 2010:297–310.
———. 2010b. “The Language of Old Comedy.” In Brill’s Companion to the Study of Greek Comedy, ed. G. W. Dobrov, 471–510. Leiden.
———. 2017. “Register variation and tense/aspect/mood categories in Ancient Greek: problems and perspectives.” In Variation and Change in Ancient Greek Tense, Aspect and Modality, ed. K. Bentein, M. Janse, and J. Soltic, 261–286. Leiden.
Willmott, J. C. 2007. The Moods of Homeric Greek. Cambridge.
———. 2009. “Modality of English Conditional Sentences: The Evidence of Ancient Greek.” In Studies on English Modality, ed. R. Facchinetti and A. Tsangalidis, 209–228.
———. 2011. “Outis and What He Can Tell Us About Negation in Homeric Greek.” In Ratio et Res Ipsa: Classical Essays Presented by Former Pupils to James Diggle on His Retirement, ed. P. Millett, S. P. Oakley, and R. J. E. Thompson, 63–80. Cambridge.
Willms, L. 2014. Transgression, Tragik und Metatheater: Versuch einer Neuinterpretation des antiken Dramas. Tübingen.
Wills, J. 1993. “Homeric Particle Order.” Historische Sprachforschung 106:61–81.
Wilson, J. C. 1909. “On the Use of ἀλλ᾽ ἤ in Aristotle.” Classical Quarterly 3:121–124.
Wilson, D., and D. Sperber. 1992. “On verbal irony.” Lingua 87:53–76.
———. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. G. Ward and L. R. Horn, 607–632. Oxford.
———. 2012a. “Linguistic form and relevance.” In Meaning and relevance, 149–168. Cambridge.
———. 2012b. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge.
Wilson, N. G. 2007. Aristophanes. Fabulae. Oxford.
———. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge.
Winer, G. B. 1867. Grammatik des neutestamentischen Sprachidioms. 7th ed. Leipzig.
Wingo, E. O. 1972. Latin Punctuation in the Classical Age. The Hague.
Winograd, E., and V. E. Church. 1988. “Role of Spatial Location in Learning Face-Name Associations.” Memory & Cognition 16:1–7.
Winter, K. 2014. Artificia mali. Das Böse als Kunstwerk in Senecas Rachetragödien. Heidelberg.
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosofische Untersuchungen. Oxford.
Wolferen, A. J. van. 2003. “Vertelde en gespeelde wereld: taalkundige notities bij de openingen van Euripides’ tragedies.” PhD diss., VU University Amsterdam.
Worman, N. 1999. “The Ties That Bind: Transformations of Costume and Connection in Euripides’ Heracles.” Ramus: Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature 28:89–107.
———. 2012. “Oedipus Abuser: Ge and Insult in the Exchange with Teiresias (OT 316-462).” Presentation at Word Play: Ancient Greek Drama and the Role of Particles, Heidelberg, November 16–18.
———. n.d. “Deixis and the Demarcation of Violent Characters in Greek Tragedy.”
Wouden, T. van der, and A. Foolen. 2015. “Dutch Particles in the Right Periphery.” Final Particles, ed. S. Hancil, A. Haselow, and M. Post, 221–247. Berlin. Published online in 2011 at
Wouk, F. 2001. “Solidarity in Indonesian Conversation: The Discourse Marker Ya.” Journal of Pragmatics 33:171–191.
Wouters, A. 1979. The Grammatical Papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the Study of the “Ars Grammatica” in Antiquity. Brussels.
———. 1995. “The Grammatical Papyri and the Techne Grammatike of Dionysius Thrax.” In Law and Sluiter 1995:95–109.
Wray, A., and M. Perkins. 2000. “The Functions of Formulaic Language: An Integrated Model.” Language & Communication 20:1–28.
Wright, M. 2013. “Tragedy and quotation: between performance and textuality.” Paper presented at the Classical Association Annual Meeting, Department of Classics, University of Reading, 3–6 April 2013.
Xanthou, M. 2007. “Το ασύνδετο στους επινίκους του Πινδάρου και του Βακχυλίδη: η διερεύνηση της λειτουργίας του ως ρητορικού και αφηγηματικού τρόπου.” PhD diss., Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Yaginuma, S. 1995. “Did Thucydides Write for Readers or Hearers?” In The Passionate Intellect, ed. L. Ayres, 131–142. London.
Yang, L. C. 2006. “Integrating Prosodic and Contextual Cues in the Interpretation of Discourse Markers.” In Fischer 2006:265–298.
Yilmaz, E. 2004. A Pragmatic Analysis of Turkish Discourse Particles: YANİ, İŞTE, and ŞEY. Ankara.
Young, D. 1974. Aeschylus. The Oresteia. Norman.
Yus, F. 2010. “Relevance Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 679–701. Oxford.
Zakowski, S. 2014. “Inference and metarepresentation: Ancient Greek ἦ πoυ as a constraint on higher-level explicatures.” Journal of Pragmatics 74:109–128.
———. 2017. From coherence to procedures: a relevance-theoretic approach to the discourse markers δέ, γάρ and οὖν in Basil the Great’s Hexaemeron, Gregory of Nazianzus’s Invectives Against Julian and Heliodorus’s Aethiopica. PhD diss., Ghent University.
Zanetto, G., and D. Del Corno. 1987. Aristofane. Gli Uccelli [text and commentary by Zanetto, Italian translation by Del Corno]. Milan.
Zeevat, H., and K. Jasinskaja. 2007. “‘And’ as an Additive Particle.” In Language, Representation and Reasoning: Memorial Volume to Isabel Gómez Txurruka, ed. M. Aurnague, K. Korta, and J. M. Larrazabal, 315–340. Vitoria-Gasteiz.
Zima, E., G. Brône, K. Feyaerts, and P. Sambre. 2008. “Resonance Activation in Interactional Parliamentary Discourse.” In Linearisation and Segmentation in Discourse: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse 2008 (MAD 08), Feb 20-23 2008, Lysebu, Oslo, ed. W. Ramm and C. Fabricius-Hansen, 137–147. Oslo.
Zimmermann, E. 2005. Focalization in Thucydides’ Sicilian Expedition. PhD diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Zoran, G. 1984. “Towards a Theory of Space in Narrative.” Poetics Today 5:309–335.
Zwicky, A. M. 1985. “Clitics and Particles.” Language 61:283–305.
Zycha, J. 1885. “Der Gebrauch von ἐπεί, ἐπείπερ, ἐπειδή, ἐπειδἠπερ.” Wiener Studien 7:82–115.